---
title: "Is solciety-io.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 25/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "solciety-io.pages.dev"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is solciety-io.pages.dev a Scam? Risk Report, Score 25/100"
trust_score: 25
classification_confidence: 70
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/solciety-io.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-10-27
---

# Is solciety-io.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 25/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 25/100.** solciety-io.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-27 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 70%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 2 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 2.2 years old (Registered history) | Clear |
| Web archive | Archived since 2024 (7 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the solciety-io.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/solciety-io.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What solciety-io.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-27. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2024.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Overview

Solciety presents itself, through its page title, as "The Political Party of the Degen". It is a single-page, crypto-culture-themed web property that borrows political-party branding and speculative-trader slang. It is served from a free shared-platform subdomain rather than a dedicated branded domain. The captured homepage carries roughly five thousand characters of text but no verifiable corporate identity, so its purpose is best read as a community or token-promotion venture whose operator is not identified.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

This site carries an **elevated risk of abuse**. Several independent threat-intelligence sources currently flag it as malicious or suspicious, and the site is **blacklisted** by external reputation feeds. Those listings are the decisive negative evidence. No conflicting legal identities and no brand impersonation were observed, and the behavioural analysis found no wallet-drainer routines, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms, credential forms posting off-site, or content cloaking. Even so, a blacklisted site sold through crypto-speculation branding is a recognised profile for token promotion, wallet-connection lures and rapid content swaps, so the absence of observed drainer behaviour does not offset the listings. The homepage also generated heavy third-party network traffic in the sandbox, including at least one data submission to a destination outside the expected set of known services, together with a very high volume of client-side script errors. This points to a poorly maintained or hastily assembled front end that communicates with outside endpoints. Evidence:

- Homepage: external reputation sources currently list the site as malicious or suspicious, and the blacklist condition is confirmed.
- Homepage behaviour: repeated sandbox runs recorded 26 external fetch requests and 26 external posts, one of them to a non-whitelisted destination, alongside 398 console errors.
- Homepage behaviour: no wallet-connection prompts, clipboard writes or cloaking were triggered in 3 of 3 successful runs.
- Archive provenance: 7 snapshots spanning 2024–2025 (2 years tracked), with a domain registration continuity of about 2.2 years.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The site is a subdomain on a shared hosting platform, so the operator's identity is **opaque**. No legal entity, company registration, licence number or regulator-backed status is stated or otherwise attached to it. The captured homepage gives no terms, ownership statement or governance disclosure that would let a reader tie it to an accountable party. This is a transparency gap rather than evidence of a scam, but it removes any recourse that a regulated counterparty would normally provide. No third-party broker record matched the site, so there is no reputational signal in either direction from that source. The site's transport encryption is valid, but it is a basic domain-validated certificate. That shows an encrypted channel, not who is behind the site. Evidence:

- Homepage and domain structure: operates on a shared-platform subdomain with no independent branded domain or named operator.
- Transport layer: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV), valid to 2026-12-27, with 61 days remaining.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (CLOUDFLARENET, US).
- Broker reputation: no matching record was found, so the site is neither endorsed nor condemned by that source.

### What to Verify Next

Before any interaction beyond viewing, the operator should be confirmed through channels independent of the site itself, such as official social accounts or announcements that predate the current page and link back to it. Any claim of a registered entity or licence should be checked directly with the relevant registry, not through links on the page. Any contract address, token, wallet or payment destination mentioned on the site should be matched against sources outside the site before value is sent. The official support and contact channels should also be confirmed offline. Current threat listings should be re-checked later, since a delisting after remediation would change the picture. Evidence:

- Homepage: no named operator, registered entity or licence reference appears in the captured content.
- Reputation: the current external listings are the main open question and should be reviewed again after remediation.
- Behaviour: the non-whitelisted outbound submission should be identified before any form or wallet interaction.

### Summary Verdict

The site's posture is **cautionary and high-risk**. Confirmed external threat listings outweigh its technical hygiene and limited behavioural stability, and the operator's identity is unestablished. The evidence does not support treating it as a legitimate counterparty for sensitive or financial purposes.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind a mainstream CDN and WAF, and all observed addresses are edge nodes. The origin server is not exposed, which limits direct attack surface but also prevents independent verification of where the content is actually hosted and allows content to be swapped quickly. This protective layer is a mitigating factor only. It has no bearing on the operator's legitimacy and cannot offset the threat listings.


### Closing Assessment

Interaction should be limited to passive, read-only viewing. Accounts, credentials, wallet connections and payments should be avoided until the threat listings are cleared and the operator is independently identified.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS`)
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)
- The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`)
- The page sent data to other domains many times while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_POSTS_HEAVY`)

### 03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of solciety-io.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on solciety-io.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2024-08-22. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2c4c |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-27 |
| Domain age | 2.18 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2024-08-22 |
| Archive snapshots | 7 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 2 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about solciety-io.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [votings-virtual.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/votings-virtual.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [vote-tokensworks-net.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/vote-tokensworks-net.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 2/100)
- [vote-mefai.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/vote-mefai.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 23/100)
- [virtuals-votings.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/virtuals-votings.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [cryptifyaiconfig.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/cryptifyaiconfig.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [claim-bitcoin-hyper.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/claim-bitcoin-hyper.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [blockdagtoken.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/blockdagtoken.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [telcoins-bank-net.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/telcoins-bank-net.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [orbitrelaydata.cfd](https://trustsniffer.com/report/orbitrelaydata.cfd), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [tron-wallet-scan.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/tron-wallet-scan.vercel.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27)
- [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites)
- [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/solciety-io.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/solciety-io.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-27.*