---
title: "Is stake-pendlefinance.pages.dev Safe? Risk Report, Score 40/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "stake-pendlefinance.pages.dev"
verdict: "Low Trust"
title: "Is stake-pendlefinance.pages.dev Safe? Trust Review, 40/100"
trust_score: 40
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/stake-pendlefinance.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-10-26
---

# Is stake-pendlefinance.pages.dev safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 40/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Low Trust, trust score 40/100.** stake-pendlefinance.pages.dev is low-trust and potentially risky.

Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-26 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 3 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 2.4 years old (Registered history) | Clear |
| Web archive | Archived since 2024 (15 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the stake-pendlefinance.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/stake-pendlefinance.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What stake-pendlefinance.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-26. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2024.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This is a hostname-only website on a shared developer hosting platform, and its name combines "stake" with "pendle finance". That wording points to a crypto staking or decentralized-finance themed storefront. In the automated capture, the only content a visitor received was a short hosting-provider interstitial headed "Suspected Phishing", returned with an access-denied response. The apparent purpose is therefore a staking or finance front-end that sits on a free subdomain rather than on an independently registered brand domain. Its real business model could not be established from what was served.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Active contradictions are present, and the posture is cautionary. The domain is **blacklisted**: several independent security engines flag it as malicious or suspicious, including at least one well-established network-security vendor, and a separate external blacklist confirms the listing. The hosting platform's own protective interstitial labels the page as suspected phishing. The hostname pairs a generic staking term with a recognizable DeFi protocol name on a free, shared subdomain. That is a recognized lookalike pattern for credential-harvesting and wallet-drain campaigns, even though no brand impersonation or conflicting legal identities were directly confirmed. Behavioral testing showed an unusually high share of traffic going to third-party hosts, with dozens of background requests and several outbound POST submissions. All of it went to recognized destinations, and no wallet-connection prompts, clipboard tampering, hidden forms or external password forms were observed. The page also changed heavily after interaction, and the console logged repeated script errors. These are secondary points. They do not offset the reputation findings, which are decisive.


Evidence:
- Homepage capture: a hosting-provider challenge page titled "Suspected Phishing" was returned with an HTTP 403 status and only a short block of text.
- Reputation: three engines rated the domain malicious and one rated it suspicious, and an external blacklist also lists it.
- Domain provenance: about 2.4 years old, a young domain on a shared platform subdomain; 15 archive snapshots span May 2024 to March 2025 (2 years tracked).
- Behavior: 48 external background requests and 5 external POSTs across 3 sandbox runs, with up to 96.7% of activity directed externally, 10 console errors and 1,508 DOM mutations after interaction.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

No legal, terms, privacy or about pages could be examined, because the only content captured was the platform's interstitial. No operator name, licence, registration number or regulator reference is therefore available, and the site's operator cannot be tied to any real-world entity. Staking, yield or trading-style services would normally require such disclosures. Nothing here amounts to regulatory standing, and no third-party broker or regulator record matched this site. The domain is also absent from DeFi protocol directories, so any link to a recognized protocol is unsupported.


Evidence:
- Homepage capture: no identity, licensing or jurisdiction information was served.
- Technical telemetry: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- Transport security: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV, domain-validated only), valid to 2027-01-21 with about 87 days remaining. This confirms encryption but says nothing about operator identity.
- DeFi recognition: the domain is not listed in DeFi protocol directories, so no TVL can be attributed to it.

### What to Verify Next

Any claimed link to a real staking or DeFi protocol must be checked against that protocol's official channels. The first step is to find the protocol's canonical domain through its verified social or documentation links, not through this hostname. The operator of this site should then be asked for a registered company name and licence reference, and those should be checked with the relevant financial regulator's public register. If the site was reached through a message, advertisement or social post, the sender should be contacted through an independent route to confirm the link's origin. Official support channels should likewise be confirmed independently.


Evidence:
- Homepage capture: the interstitial references suspected phishing, so the protocol claim must be validated externally.
- Hostname: it blends a generic staking term with a protocol-style name on a shared platform subdomain, which warrants comparison with the protocol's genuine domain.
- Third-party reputation: multiple engines and an external blacklist list the domain, so any link to it should be treated as unverified until the listings are resolved.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is high-risk and clearly cautionary. Confirmed reputation findings from several independent sources outweigh the site's basic technical hygiene. The site's identity and purpose cannot be established, and it should be treated as a probable phishing or fraud vector pending independent clearance.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is served entirely through Cloudflare's CDN/WAF, and all observed addresses are Cloudflare edge servers in the US. The origin host was not observable, so the true hosting location cannot be independently verified. The edge-only visibility also means content can be swapped quickly without any change in the visible network footprint. The valid certificate and the established infrastructure provider are mitigating factors only. They do not offset the reputation findings or establish legitimacy.


### Closing Assessment

No logins, wallet connections, credential entry, deposits or other financial interactions should be attempted with this site. At most, passive viewing from an isolated environment is acceptable. Anyone who has already interacted with it should revoke any wallet approvals and change any reused passwords.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-26 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)
- The structure of the page changed sharply while it was loading. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_DENSITY_SPIKE`)
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)
- The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`)

### 03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of stake-pendlefinance.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on stake-pendlefinance.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2024-05-20. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2d08 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-01-21 |
| Domain age | 2.43 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2024-05-20 |
| Archive snapshots | 15 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 3 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about stake-pendlefinance.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [giza-net.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/giza-net.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 30/100)
- [fattypresale.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fattypresale.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 35/100)
- [launch-peaqnetwork.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/launch-peaqnetwork.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 38/100)
- [earntit.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/earntit.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 48/100)
- [dapps-sync.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dapps-sync.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 32/100)
- [participate-peaqnetwork.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/participate-peaqnetwork.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 32/100)
- [buttcoinmoney.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/buttcoinmoney.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 35/100)
- [trumpmaga-dic.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/trumpmaga-dic.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 48/100)
- [asterdx.events](https://trustsniffer.com/report/asterdx.events), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 26/100)
- [beriomol.best](https://trustsniffer.com/report/beriomol.best), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 48/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26)
- [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/stake-pendlefinance.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/stake-pendlefinance.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-26.*