---
title: "Is stake-stone.pages.dev Safe? Risk Report, Score 36/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "stake-stone.pages.dev"
verdict: "Low Trust"
title: "Is stake-stone.pages.dev Safe? Warning Signs, Score 36/100"
trust_score: 36
classification_confidence: 70
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/stake-stone.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-10-29
---

# Is stake-stone.pages.dev safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 36/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Low Trust, trust score 36/100.** stake-stone.pages.dev is low-trust and potentially risky.

Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-29 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 70%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 3 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 2.5 years old (Registered history) | Clear |
| Web archive | Archived since 2024 (10 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the stake-stone.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/stake-stone.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What stake-stone.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-29. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2024.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Overview

The website is a single-page web property titled "StakeStone – Staking But More", published on a free shared subdomain of a developer hosting platform rather than on a standalone branded domain. From its title and framing, it presents itself as a cryptocurrency staking offering, apparently inviting visitors to put digital assets into a staking product. The only business model the available evidence supports is that of a digital-asset staking service.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

This is the decisive area of concern. Multiple independent threat-intelligence sources currently flag the site as malicious or suspicious, and it is **blacklisted** by external reputation sources. The detection is corroborated across sources and is not a lone outlier. A historical phishing association is also recorded against the domain. That fits a staking-branded page on a disposable subdomain, a pattern commonly used for short-lived credential or asset-harvesting campaigns. The site borrows the familiar vocabulary of the DeFi staking sector, yet it is not recognised as a listed protocol in any DeFi protocol directory. Nothing in the evidence connects it to an established staking platform of similar name. No conflicting legal entities were found, because no identity pages revealed competing operator names. The risk therefore rests on the blacklisting and the phishing association, not on identity inconsistency. Sandbox behaviour was mixed. No wallet-connection prompts, wallet-drainer routines, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms, credential posts to external hosts, or content cloaking were observed in the three runs. The page nonetheless generated a heavy volume of third-party traffic: dozens of external requests, including a large number of external POST submissions and a few calls to endpoints outside any recognised-service list. It also produced repeated client-side script errors. This does not prove malicious intent, but it means the page's data flows are not self-contained. Combined with the external detections, the absence of observed drainer behaviour does not offset the reputational finding. Evidence:

- Homepage and domain reputation: several independent security engines rate the domain malicious or suspicious, and the domain is listed on external blacklists.
- Homepage behaviour: the sandbox recorded 22 external XHR/fetch calls, 13 external POST requests, 3 calls to non-whitelisted endpoints, and 8 console errors across 3 runs, with no wallet-drainer, clipboard-hijack, hidden-form or cloaking activity.
- Domain provenance: the domain is about 2.5 years old, and the web archive holds 10 snapshots spanning 2024–2025 (2 years tracked), with a phishing association recorded.
- DeFi recognition: the site has no listing in a DeFi protocol directory, so no TVL can be attributed to it.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The evidence does not connect the site to any regulated financial entity. No licensing authority, registry entry or third-party broker record matched it, and its identity could not be independently tied to a real-world brand or operator. This is a verification gap, not a verdict of wrongdoing. It matters more here because a service inviting asset deposits would ordinarily be expected to name a legal operator and its authorisation. The site's identity claims should not be treated as established. The domain's registration details are incomplete, which is an administrative limitation. The technical posture is unremarkable: a valid certificate is in place, and the hosting network is well established. Those basics are available to any site, including malicious ones, and they do not offset the external detections. Evidence:

- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US), registry ARIN.
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (domain-validated, DV), valid to 2026-12-09.
- Third-party registries: no broker or regulatory-registry match was found for the site's name.

### What to Verify Next

Do not rely on this domain to confirm the operator's identity. The legitimacy of any "StakeStone" offering should be checked by reaching the product through channels independent of this site. That means looking up the project's official domain and social accounts through established DeFi directories and the relevant financial regulator's register, and not through links on this page. Any claimed licence or registration should be confirmed directly with the issuing registry. Anyone who has already visited or interacted with the site should check wallet token approvals for unfamiliar contracts and revoke any they do not recognise. Reuse of passwords entered here should be treated as a risk. Official support and contact channels should be confirmed through an independent route. Evidence:

- Homepage: the staking-branded presentation sits on a shared hosting subdomain, so ownership of the brand cannot be inferred from the address.
- Reputation findings: the external detections remain current and should be re-checked against live threat-intelligence sources before any decision to engage.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is high-risk and clearly cautionary. Corroborated external threat detections and the associated phishing history outweigh the site's technically orderly baseline. The real-world operator remains unidentified, so no positive conclusion about legitimacy can be drawn.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and all observed addresses are edge servers, so the origin host was not observable. The edge-only view limits independent hosting verification and can mask rapid content changes. The protection is a mild mitigating factor only. It is a mainstream platform available to any publisher, and it cannot offset the reputation risk.


### Closing Assessment

Limit any interaction to passive, read-only viewing. Do not log in, enter credentials, connect a wallet, approve transactions, or transfer funds until independent confirmation of the operator's legitimacy exists.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-29 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- A large share of what the page loaded came from other domains. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_MODERATE`)
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)
- The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`)
- The page sent data to other domains many times while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_POSTS_HEAVY`)

### 03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of stake-stone.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on stake-stone.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2024-05-01. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2f9c |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-09 |
| Domain age | 2.49 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2024-05-01 |
| Archive snapshots | 10 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 3 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about stake-stone.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [virtual-votings-com.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/virtual-votings-com.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 35/100)
- [kangamoon.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/kangamoon.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 50/100)
- [xcommunityrewards.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/xcommunityrewards.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 31/100)
- [ribbitsol.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ribbitsol.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 41/100)
- [stfx-5wq.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/stfx-5wq.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 41/100)
- [giza-net.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/giza-net.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 30/100)
- [fattypresale.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fattypresale.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 35/100)
- [launch-peaqnetwork.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/launch-peaqnetwork.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 38/100)
- [tg-hermesworlds-com.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/tg-hermesworlds-com.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 38/100)
- [solution-interfaces.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/solution-interfaces.xyz), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 30/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23)
- [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/stake-stone.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/stake-stone.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-29.*