---
title: "Is stakestone-stake.vercel.app Safe? Risk Report, Score 29/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "stakestone-stake.vercel.app"
verdict: "Low Trust"
title: "Is stakestone-stake.vercel.app Safe? Trust Review, 29/100"
trust_score: 29
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/stakestone-stake.vercel.app
assessed: 2026-10-26
---

# Is stakestone-stake.vercel.app safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 29/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Low Trust, trust score 29/100.** stakestone-stake.vercel.app is low-trust and potentially risky.

Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-26 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 2 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 84 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WR1) | Noted |
| Hosted by | AMAZON-02 (Server in US) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the stakestone-stake.vercel.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/stakestone-stake.vercel.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What stakestone-stake.vercel.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-26. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Overview

This website is a single-page staking front end, titled "StakeStone Staking — Omnichain Liquid Staking for ETH, BTC & Stablecoins". It is served from a free subdomain on a general-purpose application-hosting platform rather than from a dedicated brand domain. The homepage carries a substantial amount of text promoting liquid staking across several asset classes. Its apparent purpose is to attract visitors to stake or deposit crypto-assets through a decentralized-finance style interface.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

The decisive adverse signal is a confirmed external reputation problem. Multiple independent threat-intelligence engines currently flag the site as malicious or suspicious, and it is **blacklisted** by external reputation sources. A site that presents a staking product, asks visitors to commit digital assets, and carries these detections warrants a clearly cautionary posture. No impersonation of a named brand was confirmed, and no conflicting legal identities were found. The risk therefore rests on the blacklisting, not on identity contradictions. The page title borrows the vocabulary of an established staking protocol, but the site is not linked to any verified real-world operator. A free platform subdomain gives no assurance that the page is the protocol's official interface, which makes it a convenient vehicle for look-alike staking pages. A separate set of abuse reports exists, but it attaches to a shared platform IP address, not to this site specifically. It is treated as background noise from shared infrastructure and discounted. In sandbox testing the page made no external requests, triggered no wallet-connection prompts, and showed no clipboard manipulation, hidden forms, or cloaking. This lowers the likelihood of an automated drainer on the landing page, but it does not offset the blacklisting. A staking front end that behaves cleanly on a first visit can be altered later, and no behavioral test can rule that out.


Evidence:
- Homepage: promotes omnichain liquid staking for ETH, BTC and stablecoins, a product category in which fund-diverting clones are common.
- Threat-intelligence reputation: two engines rate the site malicious and one rates it suspicious, and external blacklist status is confirmed.
- Homepage sandbox runs (3 of 3 successful): zero external requests, zero wallet-connect events, zero console errors, no cloaking.
- Hosting IP reports: 84 abuse reports against a shared platform IP (216.198.79.67), discounted as shared-infrastructure noise.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The site presents no verifiable licensing, registration, or regulatory standing, and no regulatory source links it to a supervised entity. Third-party broker-reputation data shows no match, which is neutral here and neither supports nor contradicts the site. Staking and yield products that accept customer assets are regulated activities in many jurisdictions. The absence of any identifiable operator is therefore material to anyone considering a deposit. Page analysis could not independently tie the site to a real-world brand or person. Claims of affiliation with an established protocol must be treated as unconfirmed until verified outside the site.


Evidence:
- Homepage: no regulator, license, or registered-entity disclosure was established for the operator, and identity could not be independently verified.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US), registry ARIN, on a shared platform subdomain.
- Transport encryption: the TLS certificate is issued by WR1 (DV, domain-validated only) and valid to 2026-11-27. DV confirms control of the domain, not the identity of the operator.
- Broker-reputation lookup: no match found, so no third-party signal is available either way.

### What to Verify Next

Before any interaction beyond viewing, the claimed protocol affiliation should be tested against the official channels. Those are the protocol's documentation, its verified social accounts, and its canonical domain, reached independently and not through links on this page. The prospective user should confirm that the official project actually operates a staking interface at this address. Any supervisory registry in the relevant jurisdiction should be searched for the operator, and the contract addresses shown on the page should be compared with those published by the official project. Official support channels should be confirmed through an offline or independently sourced route.


Evidence:
- Homepage: the staking product is presented without an operator name that can be checked against a registry.
- Hosting: the page lives on a platform-assigned subdomain, so domain ownership gives no link to the protocol.
- External reputation: current malicious and suspicious detections should be re-checked at decision time, because listings change.

### Summary Verdict

The site carries an elevated risk posture. Confirmed adverse reputation from external detection sources outweighs the benign technical behavior observed. The legitimacy of the operator is unestablished, and the available evidence does not support treating the site as the official interface of the protocol it names.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is delivered through a trusted CDN and edge platform running on Amazon-operated address space (AS16509). All eight observed addresses are edge servers, and no origin server is visible. This protective layer, together with a valid and correctly formed TLS certificate, is a mitigating factor for transport security and availability. It says nothing about the intent or identity of the operator. Edge-only visibility also prevents independent verification of where the content is hosted and can mask rapid content changes.


### Closing Assessment

The site should be limited to read-only viewing. No wallet should be connected, no credentials entered, no assets deposited, and no transaction signed, until the operator and the official status of the interface are independently confirmed.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-26 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- A large share of what the page loaded came from other domains. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_MODERATE`)

### 03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 84 reports on hosting IP 216.198.79.67 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of stakestone-stake.vercel.app.

- The request stayed on stakestone-stake.vercel.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 216.198.79.67 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected |
| Resolved IP addresses | 8 |
| Edge IP addresses | 8 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WR1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-11-27 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 2 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 84 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about stakestone-stake.vercel.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [ndq-hunt.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ndq-hunt.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 41/100)
- [jumper-dex.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/jumper-dex.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 29/100)
- [jupiter-lite-gamma.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/jupiter-lite-gamma.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 45/100)
- [app-web-5605-dj7lzt3so-carmonamarc2-3645s-projects.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/app-web-5605-dj7lzt3so-carmonamarc2-3645s-projects.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 31/100)
- [ondo-finances.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ondo-finances.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 49/100)
- [erc-trust-wallet.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/erc-trust-wallet.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 26/100)
- [web-node-7931-oye24wry1-deployment-access1.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/web-node-7931-oye24wry1-deployment-access1.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [bscscan-uxmq.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bscscan-uxmq.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 35/100)
- [3rdstreetsville.ca](https://trustsniffer.com/report/3rdstreetsville.ca), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 40/100)
- [firesidelodge.net](https://trustsniffer.com/report/firesidelodge.net), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26)
- [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/stakestone-stake.vercel.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/stakestone-stake.vercel.app · assessed 2026-10-26.*