---
title: "Is starknet-plum.vercel.app a Scam? Trust Score 5/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "starknet-plum.vercel.app"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is starknet-plum.vercel.app a Scam? Risk Report, Score 5/100"
trust_score: 5
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/starknet-plum.vercel.app
assessed: 2026-10-26
---

# Is starknet-plum.vercel.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 5/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 5/100.** starknet-plum.vercel.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-26 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 14 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 107 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WR1) | Noted |
| Hosted by | AMAZON-02 (Server in US) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the starknet-plum.vercel.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/starknet-plum.vercel.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What starknet-plum.vercel.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-26. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This is a single-page website titled "Starknet", served from a project subdomain of a general-purpose application-hosting platform rather than from a dedicated, independently branded domain. The captured homepage returned a normal response with a modest amount of text. The available analysis did not establish a specific product, business model, or operator behind the page, so its apparent purpose is limited to presenting itself under the name of a well-known blockchain ecosystem.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

The site shows **confirmed contradictory signals**. It is **blacklisted** by external threat intelligence. A large share of the security engines that scanned it classed it as malicious, including several tier-one vendors. That level of detection independently triggered the most severe reputational cap available. No phishing page, brand-impersonation artifact, or conflicting legal identity was observed on the page itself. The risk therefore rests on the external detections, and the specific threat category behind them was not itemised. The presentation under a prominent ecosystem name, on a free project subdomain of a hosting platform, is the pattern that typically accompanies lookalike or lure pages. That is a risk consideration and not a finding of impersonation. Browser-behaviour testing was comparatively benign. Three sessions completed with no external data submissions, no wallet-connection prompts, no clipboard manipulation, no hidden forms, and no content cloaking. This lowers the likelihood of drive-by credential or wallet theft during passive viewing. It does not offset the detections, because malicious behaviour can be gated behind specific visitors, referrers, or later content changes. A large volume of abuse reports exists against one of the shared hosting addresses. Those reports belong to the platform's shared address space and are not attributable to this site, so they are discounted and carry no weight in this assessment. No contact-channel anomaly was identified. Evidence:

- Homepage and external reputation: 14 security engines flagged the site as malicious and 2 as suspicious, including three tier-one vendors, which triggered the maximum-severity reputational cap.
- Browser-behaviour testing: 3 of 3 runs completed with 0 external requests, no wallet-provider interaction, no clipboard writes, no hidden forms, and no cloaking.
- Shared hosting address: 107 abuse reports apply to a shared platform address, with zero abuse confidence, and are discounted as non-attributable.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The captured page does not tie the site to a named legal entity, licence, or registered operator, and its on-site disclosure position remains unclear. The real-world operator is not independently verified, so the site's use of the "Starknet" name cannot be treated as evidence of affiliation with any project of that name. No third-party broker or regulator-style reputational record matched the site. The absence of such a record is neutral and does not support or undermine legitimacy. The site's valid, mainstream-issued transport encryption confirms only that traffic is encrypted. It says nothing about who runs the site or whether it is safe. Evidence:

- Homepage: titled "Starknet", with no identifiable operator, company name, or licensing statement in the captured content.
- Hosting infrastructure: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US), registry ARIN.
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WR1 (domain-validated only), valid to 2026-11-27 with 32 days remaining.
- Third-party broker dataset: no match for this site.

### What to Verify Next

The priority is to establish whether this deployment is operated by, or authorised by, the organisation whose name it carries. That check should use the official website, documentation, and social channels reached independently of this site, not links on it. The listing status should be rechecked against current threat-intelligence sources before any further interaction, since a clean re-evaluation would change the picture and continued detection would confirm it. Any app, wallet, or download prompt encountered here should be treated as unverified until the operator is confirmed through those independent routes. Official support and contact channels should be confirmed only through the verified project's own publications. Evidence:

- Homepage: the page title is the only identity claim the captured content offers, and no corroborating operator information accompanies it.
- External reputation: current detections remain active, so a recheck should compare against the 14 malicious and 2 suspicious classifications recorded in this assessment.
- Hosting: the page sits on a project subdomain of a shared platform, so domain ownership cannot be inferred from the address.

### Summary Verdict

The site is assessed at an elevated risk level and should be regarded as unsafe for sensitive interaction. Confirmed external threat detections are decisive, and the benign browser behaviour and the valid encryption are insufficient to outweigh them. Apparent legitimacy is not supported, and the operator's identity remains unestablished.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is hosted on Amazon-backed address space (AS16509) and is fronted by the Vercel platform's CDN/WAF layer. All six observed addresses are edge servers, and no origin server was visible. This is a mitigating factor for availability and basic network hygiene. The edge-only visibility also prevents independent verification of the underlying host and can mask rapid content swaps. Protective infrastructure cannot offset the reputational risk and is not evidence of legitimacy.


### Closing Assessment

The site should be limited to passive, read-only viewing, if it is visited at all. No login, credential entry, wallet connection, download, or financial transaction should take place on it unless the operator is independently confirmed and the external detections have cleared.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-26 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, registration and ownership.

### 01 Governance
- A threat feed lists this domain as malicious, and that caps the score whatever the other checks found. (Governance `rule:GOV_CRITICAL_BLACKLIST`)

### 02 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 107 reports on hosting IP 216.198.79.195 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of starknet-plum.vercel.app.

- The request stayed on starknet-plum.vercel.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 216.198.79.195 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected |
| Resolved IP addresses | 6 |
| Edge IP addresses | 6 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WR1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-11-27 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 14 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 107 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about starknet-plum.vercel.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [mintest-phi.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mintest-phi.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 4/100)
- [claim-noderzz-s1.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/claim-noderzz-s1.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 21/100)
- [send-secure-trustwallet-usdt-bip20.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/send-secure-trustwallet-usdt-bip20.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [mmmm-sepia-nine.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mmmm-sepia-nine.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [u-lovat-six.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/u-lovat-six.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [stusdt-swap.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/stusdt-swap.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [dappz-uxlinks.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dappz-uxlinks.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 22/100)
- [japan-usdt.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/japan-usdt.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 21/100)
- [hyperliquidpc.live](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hyperliquidpc.live), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [almal-capital.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/almal-capital.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 2/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance)
- [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 24, 2026: 15 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-24)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/starknet-plum.vercel.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/starknet-plum.vercel.app · assessed 2026-10-26.*