--- title: "Is stonk-epoch.com a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "stonk-epoch.com" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is stonk-epoch.com a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 55 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/stonk-epoch.com assessed: 2026-10-22 --- # Is stonk-epoch.com a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** stonk-epoch.com shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-22 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 4 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 1 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YE1) | Noted | | Hosted by | CLOUDFLARENET (Server in US) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the stonk-epoch.com homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/stonk-epoch.com/screenshots/first.png) _What stonk-epoch.com served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-22. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Overview The website at the stonk-epoch.com domain presents itself as "STONK | Community Airdrop Claim" on the Solana network. It invites visitors to claim a community token distribution. Its apparent purpose is a crypto-asset claim funnel, a format often used to move visitors toward wallet interactions or token-related transactions. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Confirmed contradictions are present. Several independent threat-intelligence engines flag the domain as malicious, and it is **blacklisted** by external reputation sources. This is decisive. An "airdrop claim" lure on a newly created domain is a well-known pattern in crypto-asset fraud, where visitors are induced to connect wallets or approve transactions. The sandbox did not observe a wallet-connection prompt, a wallet-draining routine, clipboard tampering, or hidden or credential-harvesting forms in the runs performed. These negative findings do not offset the blacklisting, because a claim flow can be gated behind interaction paths the automated runs did not reach. The sandbox also saw unusually heavy third-party network activity relative to first-party requests, including numerous cross-origin data submissions. The page raised repeated script errors, which is atypical of a carefully maintained site. No brand impersonation or conflicting legal identities were observed. The risk here comes from reputation and the nature of the offer rather than from identity inconsistency. Evidence: - The domain was registered on 2026-09-11 (~0.11 years old, about 40 days), which is consistent with a recently stood-up campaign domain. - Homepage title and content present a "Community Airdrop Claim" on Solana. - Sandbox: 27 external XHR/fetch calls and 9 external POSTs, with about 98% of observed activity directed off-site, and 12 console errors across 3 successful runs. - Several threat-intelligence engines returned malicious verdicts (4 malicious, 1 suspicious), and an external blacklist hit was confirmed. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The real-world operator behind the site has not been independently established. The captured homepage content gives no basis for linking the airdrop to a recognizable project, company, or regulated entity. The page was gated by a bot challenge at capture, so legal and identity pages could not be reviewed in full. No third-party regulatory or broker-reputation match exists for the domain. The domain is registered through a mainstream registrar with a privacy proxy. That is an administrative detail and not a contradiction in itself. A token distribution of this kind would normally be tied to a named issuer and published terms, and none could be confirmed here. Evidence: - Domain registered via NameSilo, LLC, with the registrant shielded by a privacy service. - Homepage: no named operator, issuer, or registration reference was identifiable in the captured content. - Transport encryption: a Domain Validated (DV) TLS certificate issued by YE1, valid to 2026-12-10. DV validation confirms control of the domain only, not the operator's identity. - No matching third-party broker or regulatory record was found. ### What to Verify Next Any link between this site and a genuine STONK token or community should be tested against the project's official channels, reached independently of this site and not through links it provides. The claimed airdrop should be checked for an announcement on those official channels, and the claim contract or token address should be compared with the official one. Any wallet approval request should be treated as unsafe until that provenance is confirmed. The official support and contact channels should also be confirmed through an offline or independent route. Evidence: - Homepage: the "Community Airdrop Claim" framing is the main claim to validate against an official issuer announcement. - Hosting and registration records show a domain created weeks ago, so no long-standing brand history supports the claim. - Runs found no wallet provider and no wallet-connect prompt, so any claim mechanics would appear only after deeper interaction. ### Summary Verdict The assessment is critical and clearly cautionary. Confirmed external threat detections combine with a very recently created domain and an airdrop-claim proposition of the type commonly used in crypto fraud. No identity could be independently established for the operator. Technical hygiene such as valid encryption does not offset this reputational evidence, and the site cannot be treated as trustworthy. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site is served through Cloudflare's CDN/WAF, and every observed address is a Cloudflare edge address, so the true origin server is not visible. The TLS certificate is valid, and the site's bot-protection layer was also observed. These are mitigating factors only and say nothing about the operator's intent. Edge-only visibility prevents independent hosting verification and can mask rapid content swaps. The sparse subdomain footprint on a young domain is an unconfirmed heuristic. It is consistent with, but not proof of, a short-lived campaign. Evidence: - Hosting on AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US), with four edge IP addresses observed and no origin candidates. - Sandbox reported bot protection from Cloudflare with stable HTTP 200 responses across all runs. ### Closing Assessment Treat the site as read-only at most. No wallet should be connected, no transaction or approval signed, and no login details, seed phrases, or payments entered. Any wallet that has already interacted with it should be reviewed for token approvals and revoked where necessary. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Hosting and network - The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`) - The domain is young and has almost nothing else set up around it. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_SPARSE_YOUNG_DOMAIN`) ### 03 Behaviour in a sandbox - Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`) ### 04 Registration and ownership - The registration record withholds contact details for the operator. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_HIDDEN`) - Registration details are held behind a privacy service, so no operator is named publicly. This is common and legal, and it also means there is nobody to check. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_PRIVATE`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 15% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of stonk-epoch.com. - The request stayed on stonk-epoch.com. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - Registration is published under NameSilo, LLC. (Clear) - DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted) - The registration is paid up to 2027-09-11. (Noted) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | NameSilo, LLC | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:3032::6815:4e2d | | Name servers | ANNA.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM, SONNY.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | YE1 | | SSL expiry | 2026-12-10 | | Domain age | 0.11 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | 2027-09-11 | | Archive first seen | Not available | | Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 4 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about stonk-epoch.com at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [digital-arcnetwork.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/digital-arcnetwork.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [anchomrcn.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/anchomrcn.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [jupiter-desktop.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/jupiter-desktop.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [stonk-campaign.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/stonk-campaign.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [clawnch-bot.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/clawnch-bot.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [alchyra.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/alchyra.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 21/100) - [deltaofrh.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/deltaofrh.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 7/100) - [claim-pharos.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/claim-pharos.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [xcloudmultixpro.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/xcloudmultixpro.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [crestpointsmarket.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crestpointsmarket.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23) - [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/stonk-epoch.com) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/stonk-epoch.com · assessed 2026-10-22.*