--- title: "Is trongaming.net a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "trongaming.net" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is trongaming.net a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/trongaming.net assessed: 2026-10-22 --- # Is trongaming.net a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** trongaming.net shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk Assessed 2026-10-22 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 11 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 11% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 6 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 3 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2019 (14 snapshots) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YR2) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the trongaming.net homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/trongaming.net/screenshots/first.png) _What trongaming.net served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-22. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2019. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. TRONGaming is a Web3 gaming website on the trongaming.net domain. Its homepage is titled as a "Play & Earn on TRON" destination offering web3 games, NFTs, tournaments and rewards. It appears to be a crypto-gaming portal that monetises through token and NFT-based gameplay, with reward incentives for participants. The homepage carries a substantial amount of promotional text, but the real-world operator behind it has not been independently established. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk The evidence shows **confirmed contradictions** and supports a clearly cautionary assessment. Multiple established security vendors currently flag the domain as malicious, and the total exceeds ten detections, including several tier-one engines. Together with a corroborating external blacklist listing, this is a confirmed blacklist hit. No brand impersonation, conflicting legal identities or confirmed phishing page were identified, so the risk rests on the blacklist and detection convergence. The homepage's "play & earn" and "rewards" framing is a common lure in token-reward schemes, since it invites visitors to expect financial returns from participation. The site's hosting address also carries a modest number of abuse complaints, and these apply to a shared hosting provider address. They are therefore weaker evidence than the blacklist, but they are not discounted. Browser behaviour testing was mixed. Three of three runs completed with stable responses, and no wallet-draining, clipboard-hijacking, hidden-form or cloaking behaviour was seen. However, a large share of the homepage's network traffic goes to third-party destinations, including several non-whitelisted POST requests, which fits the cautionary picture. Evidence: - Homepage: more than ten security engines flag the domain as malicious, and one more marks it suspicious. An external blacklist listing corroborates this. - Domain registration: registered 2026-07-31 through the registrar Atak Domain (~0.23 years old, about 83 days). Its 14 archive snapshots span 2019–2026 (8 years tracked), so the name was captured on the web well before this registration. - Homepage behaviour: up to 81.2% of observed requests went to external destinations, with 12 external POST requests, 3 of them to non-whitelisted hosts. - Hosting address: 6 abuse reports from 3 distinct reporters, categories including those relevant to web abuse. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The available evidence identifies no licence, regulator listing or corporate registration for the operator. The third-party broker reputation dataset returned no match for the site. That is an absence of reputational context, not a clean or negative verdict. Because the site invites participation in token- and NFT-based gaming with reward promises, the operator's legal identity and any applicable virtual-asset or gaming authorisation matter. The domain's registrant details are generic and name no accountable business, so the site cannot currently be tied to a real-world company or person. Whether a licence exists cannot be established from the evidence supplied. This note concerns verification only. The scam risk assessment above rests on the confirmed security detections, not on missing licensing information. Evidence: - Homepage: the page carries no regulator reference or legal-entity disclosure in the captured evidence, and the on-page disclosure position is unclear. - Registration record: the registrant appears only as "Domain Administrator" and as the registrant of the domain itself, with no business name. - Hosting: served from AS59692 (IQWEB - IQWeb FZ-LLC, AE). - Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by YR2 at domain-validation (DV) level, valid to 2027-01-20. This confirms encryption only, not the operator's identity. ### What to Verify Next Until the blacklist status is resolved, the site should be treated as unfit for any sensitive interaction. If an evaluation is still required, the operator's identity should be established through independent routes before any engagement. That means searching the relevant company, virtual-asset and gaming registries for a named legal entity and licence number. Any reward, tournament or token claims should be checked against independent coverage or an on-chain explorer, not the site's own pages. Official contact and support channels should be confirmed through an independent route, not through links on the site. If the site's owner is a legitimate operator, the security vendor flags should be re-checked later, after the owner has cleaned and re-submitted the domain. Evidence: - Registration record: no business name is given, so any named entity must come from an independent source. - Homepage: the "play & earn", NFT, tournament and rewards claims are made by the site itself and are not independently corroborated. - Security detections: these are current. Their resolution can be re-tested after the owner requests review. ### Summary Verdict The site carries an elevated, critical-level risk posture. Current security detections and a blacklist listing converge with a very young registration and an unverified operator identity. The positive technical signals present, a valid certificate and a stable, responsive page, are routine and do not offset the reputational findings. The evidence supports only a cautionary reading, not a conclusion that the operator is legitimate. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site resolves to a single address at the hosting provider IQWeb FZ-LLC, based in the United Arab Emirates. No content-delivery network or web application firewall was detected, so the origin server is directly reachable and no protective layer mitigates exposure. An unconfirmed heuristic notes a mismatch between the address's geographic location and its regional registry. The same heuristic notes a sparse subdomain footprint for a young domain. Neither is treated as a confirmed risk. ### Closing Assessment The site should be limited to read-only viewing, if viewed at all. Account login, credential entry, wallet connection and any payment or token transaction should be avoided until the detections are cleared and the operator is independently verified. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, behaviour in a sandbox. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Hosting and network - The hosting and network setup shows a moderate level of risk indicators. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_RISK_MED`) - The domain is young and has almost nothing else set up around it. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_SPARSE_YOUNG_DOMAIN`) - The domain is young and has a very small footprint on the network. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_LOW_FOOTPRINT_YOUNG_DOMAIN`) - Several separate hosting and network checks came back negative. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_MULTIPLE_NEGATIVE_SIGNALS`) ### 03 Behaviour in a sandbox - Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`) ### Signals weighed against the site - AbuseIPDB: 6 reports on hosting IP 186.2.175.35 (IQWeb FZ-LLC, Data Center/Web Hosting/Transit), 11% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website. ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of trongaming.net. - The request stayed on trongaming.net. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - Registration is published under Atak Domain. (Clear) - DNS for this domain is served by trustname.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted) - The registration is paid up to 2027-07-31. (Noted) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2019-09-25. (Clear) - It is hosted on IQWEB, from a server in AE. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Atak Domain | | Hosting | IQWEB - IQWeb FZ-LLC, AE | | Country | AE | | Server IP | 186.2.175.35 | | Name servers | ARES.TRUSTNAME.COM, ZEUS.TRUSTNAME.COM | | CDN / edge network | Not detected | | Resolved IP addresses | 1 | | Edge IP addresses | 0 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 1 | | SSL issuer | YR2 | | SSL expiry | 2027-01-20 | | Domain age | 0.23 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | 2027-07-31 | | Archive first seen | 2019-09-25 | | Archive snapshots | 14 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 11 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 11% confidence, 6 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about trongaming.net at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [primexbtf.net](https://trustsniffer.com/report/primexbtf.net), another .net site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [railsx-dex.net](https://trustsniffer.com/report/railsx-dex.net), another .net site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [lefou.net](https://trustsniffer.com/report/lefou.net), another .net site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [metadao-dex.net](https://trustsniffer.com/report/metadao-dex.net), another .net site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [phantom-alerts.net](https://trustsniffer.com/report/phantom-alerts.net), another .net site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [runelight.net](https://trustsniffer.com/report/runelight.net), another .net site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [finance-community.net](https://trustsniffer.com/report/finance-community.net), another .net site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [alloxai.net](https://trustsniffer.com/report/alloxai.net), another .net site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [crypto-inq.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-inq.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 1/100) - [listup.blog](https://trustsniffer.com/report/listup.blog), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites) - [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/trongaming.net) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/trongaming.net · assessed 2026-10-22.*