--- title: "Is tronscanerc.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 5/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "tronscanerc.pages.dev" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is tronscanerc.pages.dev a Scam? Risk Report, Score 5/100" trust_score: 5 classification_confidence: 55 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/tronscanerc.pages.dev assessed: 2026-10-27 --- # Is tronscanerc.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 5/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 5/100.** tronscanerc.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-27 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 4 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted | | Hosted by | CLOUDFLARENET (Server in US) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the tronscanerc.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/tronscanerc.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png) _What tronscanerc.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-27. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. The website is a single-page landing site on a free subdomain of a developer-hosting platform. The page title reads "Transfer Trust Wallet" and carries only a few lines of text. The domain name evokes a blockchain-explorer and token-standard brand. Its apparent purpose is to prompt visitors toward a cryptocurrency wallet transfer flow. It shows no named operator, product description, or corporate context. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Contradictory signals are present, and they are decisive. Several independent threat-intelligence engines currently flag the site as malicious, and one tier-one security vendor is among them. Further suspicious classifications and an external blacklist listing back this up, so the site is **blacklisted** on reputation grounds. The page itself offers little to counter this. It is a thin landing page whose title and domain wording suggest a wallet-transfer action, a pattern typical of crypto-drainer and credential-harvesting lures. The domain's construction is lookalike-style, and there is no legitimate brand context to explain it. The sandbox did observe benign behavior: no outbound requests to third parties, no wallet-connection attempts, no clipboard manipulation, no hidden forms, and no cloaking. This shows only that the captured page was passive during testing. It does not offset the external detections, because a minimal page can be swapped for a malicious one with little effort. No conflicting legal identities were observed, since the site names no entity at all. Evidence: - Homepage: titled "Transfer Trust Wallet" with only a few lines of visible text and no description of services, operator, or terms. - Reputation: multiple threat-intelligence engines, including a tier-one vendor, flag the domain as malicious or suspicious. An external blacklist also lists it. - Behavioral testing: three successful sessions showed no third-party traffic, wallet-connection prompts, or clipboard writes. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The site presents no legal pages, company name, license, registration number, or contact point, and registration details are incomplete. A site that invites asset transfers while disclosing nothing about who operates it, or under what authority, cannot be placed in any regulatory frame. Third-party broker databases hold no record of the site, and that absence is not a regulatory finding either way. The valid transport encryption is a baseline hygiene item. It is a domain-validated certificate that proves only control of the hostname, not the identity or good faith of the operator. Evidence: - Homepage: no company name, license reference, terms, privacy policy, or contact details. - Served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US). - TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV), valid to 2026-12-01, which is 35 days remaining. - Broker-reputation databases return no match for the domain. ### What to Verify Next No verification step is needed to justify caution, since the external detections already settle that. Anyone with a legitimate reason to assess the site, such as a security analyst or an affected user, should do the following. First, obtain the service or wallet brand that directed the visitor here from its official, independently sourced channels, and confirm whether it ever uses this hostname. Second, establish who referred the link, since lures of this kind typically arrive through messages, social posts, or advertisements. Third, confirm official support channels through an offline or independently known route. Finally, report the address to the relevant platform abuse desk, and to the wallet provider if the link claimed to represent one. Evidence: - Homepage: the only action cue is the wallet-transfer title, with no stated provider to check against. - The hostname sits on a shared hosting platform's subdomain space, so no standalone corporate domain can confirm affiliation. ### Summary Verdict The overall posture is high-risk. The decisive factor is a current, multi-source adverse reputation, which outweighs the page's clean technical hygiene. Identity cannot be tied to any real-world operator. Legitimacy is not supported by the available evidence. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site is fronted by a major CDN and web application firewall, and all four observed edge addresses belong to that provider. The origin server is not observable, so hosting cannot be independently verified, and content can be swapped behind the edge without detection. This protective layer is a mitigating factor only. It does not offset the reputation risk and says nothing about the operator's intent. ### Closing Assessment The site should not be used for login, wallet connection, asset transfers, or any payment. No credentials, seed phrases, or approvals should be entered, and nothing should be downloaded from it. Anyone who has already interacted with it should immediately revoke any token approvals, move assets to a fresh wallet, and change affected passwords. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, registration and ownership. ### 01 Governance - A threat feed lists this domain as malicious, and that caps the score whatever the other checks found. (Governance `rule:GOV_CRITICAL_BLACKLIST`) ### 02 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 03 Registration and ownership - The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of tronscanerc.pages.dev. - The request stayed on tronscanerc.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2f15 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WE1 | | SSL expiry | 2026-12-01 | | Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | Not available | | Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 4 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about tronscanerc.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [sentioai.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/sentioai.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [nervos-mainnet.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/nervos-mainnet.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [waytosecureyo-xpxtoksvpemil.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/waytosecureyo-xpxtoksvpemil.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [custodial-dextradingclaims.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/custodial-dextradingclaims.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [x-validator-gateway-hub.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/x-validator-gateway-hub.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [stacknodes.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/stacknodes.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [stargazezone.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/stargazezone.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 17/100) - [x-validator-credentials-check.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/x-validator-credentials-check.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [061kp.cc](https://trustsniffer.com/report/061kp.cc), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [322285.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/322285.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites) - [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/tronscanerc.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/tronscanerc.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-27.*