--- title: "Is uniswap-views.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "uniswap-views.pages.dev" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is uniswap-views.pages.dev a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/uniswap-views.pages.dev assessed: 2026-10-25 --- # Is uniswap-views.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** uniswap-views.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-25 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 10 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Listed as unsafe (Google) | Risk | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 2 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the uniswap-views.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/uniswap-views.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png) _What uniswap-views.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-25. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2026. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet, Google, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. The address in question is a very recently created hostname on a free, shared web-publishing subdomain, and its name incorporates the brand term of a well-known decentralized exchange. Automated visits did not reach a normal site. They received a 403 interstitial headed "Suspected Phishing", and only a few hundred characters of text were captured. The site presents no verifiable product, company or business model, and its apparent purpose cannot be established from the captured content. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Active contradictions are present, and they are decisive. A major browser-safety service currently flags the address under its social-engineering category, which covers phishing and deceptive-site behavior. Ten security engines also rate it malicious and one more rates it suspicious. The engines include several top-tier vendors. Together these produce a confirmed blacklist condition, and the browser-safety listing alone is enough to trigger a protective block. The hostname pairs a recognizable exchange brand term with a disposable, free-hosting parent domain. That is the typical construction of a lookalike lure aimed at crypto-wallet users. No conflicting legal identities were found, because no identity pages were captured. The case for risk therefore rests on external detections and the structure of the hostname. In the sandbox, no wallet-connection prompts, clipboard tampering, hidden forms, or credential posts to external destinations were observed. That result is limited, because the main page was blocked at capture and the real content may never have been exercised. It does not offset the detections. Brand-lookalike pages of this kind commonly show wallet-connection or signing prompts to targeted visitors while appearing blocked or empty to automated scanners. Evidence: - Homepage: the captured response was a 403 interstitial titled "Suspected Phishing", with 381 characters of text and no usable site content. - Domain provenance: registered 2026, about 48 days old (~0.13 years); web archive holds 1 snapshot dated 2026-09-06, spanning a single year, so there is no meaningful history. - Reputation: a browser-safety service flags the domain as social engineering, 10 engines rate it malicious and 1 suspicious, and an external blacklist condition is active. - Behavior: 88 external XHR requests were made, with about 97% of activity going to external hosts. Sandbox runs logged 12 console errors and a large DOM mutation burst after interaction (1,508 changes). ### Regulatory Verification Notes No legal, identity, terms, privacy or licensing pages could be captured, so no entity name, jurisdiction, registration number or regulator reference is available. No third-party regulatory source or broker-database entry matches the site. Any financial or trading functionality associated with the exchange brand in the hostname therefore has no regulatory standing that can be tied to this address. Ownership and governance are opaque, and domain registration details are incomplete. This is secondary to the external detections and is not the basis of the verdict. The transport-layer facts are clean but carry no weight as proof of legitimacy. Free domain-validated certificates are routinely issued to phishing pages and give no assurance about the operator. Evidence: - Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US), registry ARIN. - Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WE1, domain-validated (DV) only, valid to 2026-11-28 with 33 days remaining. - Protocol directory: the domain is not recognized in any decentralized-finance protocol directory, so no TVL or protocol listing supports a link to the brand. - Legal pages: none captured, so no operator, license or registration disclosure exists to assess. ### What to Verify Next The authenticity of the exchange's own channels should be confirmed only from sources already known to be genuine. These include the official application, a bookmarked address, and the project's verified social accounts. The hostname should not be treated as an official property unless the brand owner confirms it through an independent route. Any inbound message, advertisement or social post that directed a user to this address should be treated as a likely lure. It should be reported to the platform where it appeared. If wallet-connection or token-approval prompts were already accepted on this site, the wallet's approvals list should be reviewed and any unfamiliar allowances revoked. Security teams should check whether the hostname appears in email, chat, or proxy logs, and should block it at the network and mail layers. Evidence: - Homepage: the interstitial warning and the absence of any captured content mean nothing on the page can be taken as proof of origin. - Hostname: it embeds a recognized exchange brand term on a free, shared parent domain, so legitimacy would need confirmation from the brand owner. - Reputation: the active blacklist condition means the address should be treated as hostile until delisting is shown. ### Summary Verdict The overall posture is critical. Confirmed external threat detections, a lookalike-style hostname, and a domain only weeks old with no history converge on a deceptive, high-risk site. The site has no verifiable operator identity to counterbalance them. The sandbox shows no active exploit behavior, but that observation is incomplete and does not change the conclusion. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and all four observed IP addresses (IPv4 and IPv6) are edge servers, so the origin host cannot be independently identified. The infrastructure itself is mainstream and shows no technical anomaly. Shared edge hosting of this kind is also available to phishing operators, and it makes the hosting hard to verify and content swaps easy to hide. The infrastructure is a mitigating factor only. It cannot offset the reputational findings, and it says nothing about who operates the site. ### Closing Assessment Credentials, seed phrases, wallet connections, signing requests and payments should not be submitted to this address. The site should be neither visited nor interacted with beyond passive inspection in an isolated environment, and no file or prompt it serves should be accepted. Organizations should add it to blocklists and report it to the relevant brand-protection channels. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-25 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Hosting and network - The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`) ### 03 History in the web archive - The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`) ### 04 Behaviour in a sandbox - Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`) - The structure of the page changed sharply while it was loading. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_DENSITY_SPIKE`) ### 05 Registration and ownership - The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of uniswap-views.pages.dev. - The request stayed on uniswap-views.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-06. (Clear) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2cc4 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WE1 | | SSL expiry | 2026-11-28 | | Domain age | 0.13 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | 2026-09-06 | | Archive snapshots | 1 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 10 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 1 match | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about uniswap-views.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [vote-polls954.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/vote-polls954.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [kuroro-xyz.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/kuroro-xyz.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 2/100) - [coincomms.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/coincomms.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 4/100) - [fpxy.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fpxy.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 22/100) - [h1-34c.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/h1-34c.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [rmwproperty-smartcontract.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/rmwproperty-smartcontract.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [polyperps.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/polyperps.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [blockguildmiddleware.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/blockguildmiddleware.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [omengineers.net](https://trustsniffer.com/report/omengineers.net), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [alankaraa.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/alankaraa.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance) - [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 24, 2026: 15 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-24) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/uniswap-views.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/uniswap-views.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-25.*