--- title: "Is veno.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "veno.pages.dev" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is veno.pages.dev a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/veno.pages.dev assessed: 2026-10-29 --- # Is veno.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** veno.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-29 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 11 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 2.6 years old (Registered history) | Clear | | Web archive | Archived since 2024 (18 snapshots) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the veno.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/veno.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png) _What veno.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-29. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2024. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. This website is a single-page promotional site hosted on a free subdomain of a developer web-hosting platform. It presents itself under the title "Venom Blockchain Testnet Campaign" and appears to market a cryptocurrency testnet participation or incentive campaign. Its apparent purpose is to draw visitors into a blockchain-themed campaign. The page carries roughly four thousand characters of text, but the operator is not identified. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Material contradictory signals are present, and the site is **blacklisted** by external reputation sources. A substantial number of independent security engines currently flag the domain as malicious, including two top-tier vendors, and a smaller number mark it suspicious. That volume of detections exceeds the level at which the assessment is capped at its lowest band regardless of other factors. Behavioural testing adds a second, independent warning. After scripted interaction, the page's visible layout and its text content both changed almost completely, which is a **strong cloaking pattern**. A visitor who clicks may be shown something materially different from what a scanner or a first-time viewer sees. The page also produced a very large number of DOM mutations after interaction and a high rate of script errors. Most of its network traffic went to external hosts, though no uninvited external form posts, hidden forms, clipboard manipulation or wallet-drainer behaviour were observed in the test runs. The blockchain-testnet-campaign framing is a recognised lure for crypto-asset phishing and airdrop-style credential or seed-phrase harvesting. The site's affiliation with any real blockchain project is unconfirmed, and no formal brand-impersonation or conflicting-identity finding was recorded. The combination of third-party detections and cloaking nonetheless places the site firmly in a high-risk posture. Evidence: - Homepage: multiple security engines flag the domain as malicious, including two top-tier vendors, and the external blacklist condition is confirmed. - Homepage behaviour: after interaction, the semantic and visual content differed by essentially 100%, indicating strong cloaking across all three test runs. - Homepage behaviour: 55 external requests (about 94% external at peak), 16 console errors and 4,182 DOM mutations after interaction. - Domain provenance: about 2.6 years old, with 18 archive snapshots spanning 2024–2025 (2 years tracked), which is a short history for a site flagged this heavily. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The site gives no evidence of regulatory standing. No financial-services registration, licence or supervisory authority is associated with it, and its real-world operator is not independently verified. Registration details are incomplete, so the operator behind a crypto-themed campaign is **opaque**. That is an ownership-opacity condition, not an identity contradiction, and the elevated risk rests on the detections and cloaking above. Because the site invites participation in a token-related programme, the absence of any verifiable corporate or regulatory anchor is significant. No third-party broker or regulatory-database match was found, so there is no external reputational signal that offsets the security findings. Evidence: - Homepage: the page presents a blockchain testnet campaign but names no legal entity, registered company or regulator. - Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US); the origin host cannot be tied to any named operator. - Transport: the TLS certificate is issued by WE1, domain-validated (DV) only, valid to 2026-11-30. DV validates domain control, not organisational identity. ### What to Verify Next Any approach should start from the official channels of the blockchain project the page claims to represent. Its project name, campaign announcement and official domain should be confirmed through that project's independently known website, verified social accounts or documentation, reached by a route that does not pass through this site. Any claim of a testnet campaign, reward or token distribution should be treated as unconfirmed until the project itself confirms it. Any contact channel the page offers should be confirmed through an independent route before use. Operator identity and any licensing should be checked with the relevant public registries, because the page offers neither. Evidence: - Homepage: the campaign claim is the central call to action and has no on-page corroboration from a named project or entity. - Hosting: the site sits on a shared, free subdomain of a developer hosting platform, so the domain gives no organisational identity. - Reputation: current detections by several major security vendors mean any later re-check should confirm whether the listings have been cleared. ### Summary Verdict The overall posture is high risk. Independent threat-detection consensus and strong evidence of content that changes after interaction outweigh every mitigating technical factor, and the site's identity remains unverified. Its valid encryption and mainstream hosting do not establish that it is trustworthy. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site is delivered through Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and all observed addresses are CDN edge servers, so the true origin host is not observable. The CDN is reputable, shared infrastructure with clean abuse-report history, and the TLS certificate is valid and issued by a known authority. These are **mitigating factors only**. They show the traffic is well-run infrastructure, not that the content or operator is legitimate, and they cannot offset the external detections. Edge-only visibility also makes it harder to verify hosting independently and easier to swap content quickly. ### Closing Assessment The site should not be used for logging in, entering credentials, connecting a crypto wallet, sharing recovery phrases, or sending funds or financial details. If a visit is unavoidable, it should be read-only, from an isolated or disposable environment, with no downloads. Anyone who has already interacted with it should review wallet permissions and change any reused passwords. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-29 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 2 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox - Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`) - The page replaced a large part of its own content after loading. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_CHANGE_HIGH`) - The page rewrote itself after it was interacted with, so what a visitor first sees is not what they end up on. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_DIFF_AFTER_INTERACTION`) - The structure of the page changed sharply while it was loading. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_DENSITY_SPIKE`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of veno.pages.dev. - The request stayed on veno.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2024-03-28. (Clear) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2ef4 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 12 | | Edge IP addresses | 12 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WE1 | | SSL expiry | 2026-11-30 | | Domain age | 2.58 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | 2024-03-28 | | Archive snapshots | 18 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 11 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about veno.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [site-8652333466-fiatify-app.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/site-8652333466-fiatify-app.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [ronin-devrpc.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ronin-devrpc.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [nearnear-bdb.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/nearnear-bdb.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [isync.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/isync.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [solciety-io.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/solciety-io.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 25/100) - [naruflix.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/naruflix.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [apeterminal-reg-web3.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/apeterminal-reg-web3.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [claim-stargrace.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/claim-stargrace.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [flockerztokenclaim.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/flockerztokenclaim.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [pumpfunsol.live](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pumpfunsol.live), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27) - [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/veno.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/veno.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-29.*