---
title: "Is vote-okxpolls-176.pages.dev Safe? Trust Score 51/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "vote-okxpolls-176.pages.dev"
verdict: "Moderate Trust"
title: "Is vote-okxpolls-176.pages.dev Safe? Trust Review, 51/100"
trust_score: 51
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/vote-okxpolls-176.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-10-22
---

# Is vote-okxpolls-176.pages.dev safe? TrustSniffer's moderate-trust assessment: 51/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Moderate Trust, trust score 51/100.** vote-okxpolls-176.pages.dev is moderately trusted.

Most signals looked ordinary, and some evidence was missing. Read the checks below before you pay or hand over personal details.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-22 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 1 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YE2) | Noted |
| Hosted by | CLOUDFLARENET (Server in US) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the vote-okxpolls-176.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/vote-okxpolls-176.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What vote-okxpolls-176.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-22. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Overview

This is a minimal-footprint web property hosted as a subdomain on a shared static-page hosting platform. Its hostname combines the name of a major crypto exchange with the words "vote" and "polls" and a numeric suffix. At capture, the homepage returned a not-found response with no readable content, so it showed no visible products, forms or operator branding. The name suggests a campaign or voting landing page aimed at users of that exchange, a format often used to draw visitors into account or wallet interactions.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

A **confirmed external blacklist hit** is the decisive contradiction on this site. At least one major reputation engine rates the hostname as malicious and another as suspicious, and the aggregated external reputation view is flagged. No identity contradiction was found, because no legal-entity names are published to conflict. No content-level phishing or impersonation was confirmed on the captured page. The hostname still invokes a well-known exchange brand paired with a "vote/polls" theme, a construction commonly used for lure pages. Combined with the blacklist hit, this pattern warrants treating the site as a potential brand-themed lure until proven otherwise. In the behavioral sandbox, three runs produced no external network requests, no wallet-connect prompts, no hidden or externally posting password forms, no clipboard manipulation and no cloaking. This is mitigating, but it covers only the empty page that was served. Content swapped in later would not be covered. A published contact address was not available to assess. Evidence:

- Homepage: returned a not-found response with no substantive content at capture, so no product claims could be assessed.
- Hostname: pairs a major exchange's brand name with "vote" and "polls" on a free shared-hosting subdomain.
- External reputation: one engine reports the hostname as malicious and one as suspicious, and the aggregated blacklist flag is active.
- Sandbox: 3 of 3 runs completed with zero external requests and no wallet, clipboard or hidden-form activity.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The captured site has no legal, terms, privacy, about or contact pages, so no operator name, registered entity, licence or registration number is published. Operator identity therefore cannot be linked to any real-world brand or person, and ownership is opaque. This is a verification gap rather than proof of wrongdoing, but here it sits alongside a confirmed external blacklist hit. No third-party broker or regulatory-database match was found, so no external reputational context exists either way. Transport security is present and technically sound. This shows that the connection is encrypted, not who operates the site or whether it is legitimate. Evidence:

- Homepage: no identity, licensing or legal-disclosure content was retrievable.
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by YE2 (DV, domain validation only, no organization identity), valid to 2027-01-14.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- Third-party broker dataset: no match for this hostname.

### What to Verify Next

Before any interaction, confirm through the exchange's official website or verified social channels, reached independently and not through this site, whether any poll, vote or campaign exists. Treat any invitation to this hostname as unverified until the exchange confirms it. Establish who operates the site through an independent route and do not rely on anything the page claims. Re-check the site's external reputation status before any later reassessment, because a clean result would be needed to change this posture. Confirm the official contact and support channels of any organization the site claims to represent through an independent, offline route. Evidence:

- Hostname: the exchange-themed "vote/polls" naming is the claim that needs independent confirmation.
- Homepage: no operator, campaign sponsor or contact details are published to test.
- External reputation: the active blacklist flag is the baseline against which any re-check should be compared.

### Summary Verdict

The site carries an elevated risk posture. Its technical hygiene is adequate: encrypted transport and quiet sandbox behavior. However, the confirmed external reputation hit is decisive and protective measures cannot offset it. No operator has been identified, and no legitimate function has been demonstrated. The evidence supports caution rather than a finding of confirmed fraud.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site runs behind Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and all four observed addresses are edge servers, so the origin host is not visible. This is a mitigating factor. It shows mainstream, well-run infrastructure, but it does not show legitimacy, and it limits independent hosting verification. It also makes rapid content changes harder to detect, which matters for a page that is currently empty. The platform's shared, free subdomain model means the hosting provider vouches for nothing about the site's operator.


### Closing Assessment

Use should be limited to read-only viewing at most. No login, credentials, wallet connection or financial interaction should take place through this site. Anyone who arrived via a message, advertisement or social post should treat that source as unverified and report it to the exchange it appears to reference.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

2 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- A small number of malware engines flagged this domain. On its own this is a weak signal. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_MEDIUM`)

### 02 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of vote-okxpolls-176.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on vote-okxpolls-176.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2f5c |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | YE2 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-01-14 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about vote-okxpolls-176.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [slerfwth.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/slerfwth.pages.dev), a similar name (Moderate Trust, 62/100)
- [calirsprvveb3toksscliam01x.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/calirsprvveb3toksscliam01x.pages.dev), a similar name (Moderate Trust, 64/100)
- [cryptoman-whitebit-pay.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/cryptoman-whitebit-pay.pages.dev), a similar name (Moderate Trust, 60/100)
- [scarquest-whitelist.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/scarquest-whitelist.pages.dev), a similar name (Moderate Trust, 60/100)
- [tor-bgc.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/tor-bgc.pages.dev), a similar name (Moderate Trust, 50/100)
- [pepepenny.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pepepenny.pages.dev), a similar name (Moderate Trust, 54/100)
- [crudoprotocol-dashboard.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crudoprotocol-dashboard.pages.dev), a similar name (Moderate Trust, 52/100)
- [roostwtf.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/roostwtf.pages.dev), a similar name (Moderate Trust, 52/100)
- [premiumevents.ge](https://trustsniffer.com/report/premiumevents.ge), another site assessed as moderate-trust (Moderate Trust, 65/100)
- [myheartcode.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/myheartcode.com), another site assessed as moderate-trust (Moderate Trust, 65/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as legitimate](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/verified-legit), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27)
- [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/vote-okxpolls-176.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/vote-okxpolls-176.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-22.*