--- title: "Is vote-spectrafinance.app a Scam? Trust Score 5/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "vote-spectrafinance.app" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is vote-spectrafinance.app a Scam? Risk Report, Score 5/100" trust_score: 5 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/vote-spectrafinance.app assessed: 2026-10-25 --- # Is vote-spectrafinance.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 5/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 5/100.** vote-spectrafinance.app shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-25 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 10 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 4 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the vote-spectrafinance.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/vote-spectrafinance.app/screenshots/first.png) _What vote-spectrafinance.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-25. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2026. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. This website, presented under a domain that combines a "vote" prefix with the name of a decentralized-finance brand, shows a single landing page titled as an open interest-rate derivatives protocol. The captured page carries only a short block of text, which is consistent with a minimal front end for a crypto-finance product. Its apparent purpose is to draw visitors into a DeFi-style protocol experience, the kind of site that normally asks for wallet connections or governance participation. No product mechanics, yield figures or leverage terms were captured in the visible content. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk The site carries a **confirmed blacklist listing**. Multiple independent security sources flag the domain as malicious, including several major security vendors, and an external blacklist condition is active. This is decisive. The domain also pairs a "vote" prefix with a protocol-style brand name and was registered only a few months ago. That pattern is common in lookalike lures aimed at holders of crypto assets. These facts do not by themselves prove brand impersonation. The page does not show conflicting legal identities, and no phishing form was captured. The listing alone is enough to treat the domain as hostile for any sensitive action. The site's browser behaviour was unremarkable. It made no external network calls, hidden forms, clipboard manipulation or wallet-drainer routines in the observed sessions. This does not offset the reputation findings, because a harmless-looking front end can be switched to malicious content quickly. The page also logged a high volume of script errors, which suggests a hastily assembled or unstable build. No contact-channel anomaly or published contact artifact was captured. Evidence: - Homepage and domain reputation: the domain is listed as malicious by multiple independent security sources, and the external blacklist condition is active. - Domain provenance: registered 2026-06-22 (~0.34 years old) through NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED, with expiry set for 2027-06-22. - Web-archive history: 1 archive snapshot, captured 2026-07-04 (1 year tracked), so there is no prior history behind the domain. - Homepage behaviour: 0 external requests and 24 console errors across 3 successful sandbox runs. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The captured page discloses no operating company, licence, registration number or governance information, and the on-page disclosure state is unclear. That absence is a verification gap and is not itself evidence of fraud. Ownership of the domain is not clearly attributable to a named party. This is ownership opacity, not an identity contradiction, because no conflicting legal-entity names appear. Real-world identity could not be independently connected to any known brand or person. The site must therefore not be assumed to be the official presence of any existing protocol. No third-party broker or regulator database matched the site, so there is no regulatory signal in either direction. The site also has no recognition in DeFi protocol directories. Evidence: - Homepage: the captured text is short and names no legal entity, licence or registry number. - Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US). - Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV), valid to 2027-01-17. A domain-validated certificate confirms only control of the domain, not the identity of its operator. - DeFi directory check: the domain is not listed in the DeFiLlama protocol directory, so there is no TVL to corroborate. ### What to Verify Next The relationship, if any, between this domain and the protocol it names should be checked through the protocol's officially published channels. These include its documentation, verified social accounts and the domain links shown on independent protocol aggregators, all reached by typing or bookmarking them directly. The link to this site must not be followed from it or from the message that delivered it. Where a governance vote is being solicited, the user should confirm through the protocol's official community forum or governance portal that such a vote exists. Any advertising or messaging that referred the user here should be reported to the platform it came from. If an unauthorised wallet approval or signature has already occurred, the user should review and revoke token permissions with an independent wallet-security tool. Contact and support channels should be confirmed only through official sources, not through anything this site displays. Evidence: - Domain naming: the "vote" prefix and protocol-style name suggest a governance or voting lure, which makes confirmation of the official domain the primary check. - Homepage: it presents the protocol title but offers no verifiable cross-link or corporate attribution. - Domain history: the domain is only months old and has a single archive capture. ### Summary Verdict The overall posture is high risk and clearly cautionary. Independent threat-intelligence listings decide the assessment and override the otherwise technically tidy profile of valid encryption and quiet sandbox behaviour. Real-world operator identity remains unverified. The site should be regarded as a probable threat vector, not as an established or legitimate protocol presence. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site is delivered through Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and every observed address belongs to its edge network. No origin server address was observable. This is a mitigating factor only, since it reflects commodity protective infrastructure available to any registrant and says nothing about the operator's legitimacy. It also prevents independent hosting verification and can mask rapid content swaps, which limits how far a clean sandbox result can be relied on. ### Closing Assessment Passive viewing, if any, is the only low-exposure use. The site should not be used for any wallet connection, signature, approval, credential entry, voting or financial transaction. Links to it should not be shared, and any prior interaction should be treated as a potential compromise to be reviewed promptly. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-25 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 6 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, history in the web archive, hosting and network, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership. ### 01 Governance - A threat feed lists this domain as malicious, and that caps the score whatever the other checks found. (Governance `rule:GOV_CRITICAL_BLACKLIST`) ### 02 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 03 History in the web archive - The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`) ### 04 Hosting and network - The domain was registered between three and six months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_YOUNG_6M`) ### 05 Behaviour in a sandbox - A large share of what the page loaded came from other domains. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_MODERATE`) ### 06 Registration and ownership - The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of vote-spectrafinance.app. - The request stayed on vote-spectrafinance.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - Registration is published under NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED. (Clear) - DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted) - The registration is paid up to 2027-06-22. (Noted) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-07-04. (Clear) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:3035::ac43:b22e | | Name servers | janet.ns.cloudflare.com, kenneth.ns.cloudflare.com | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WE1 | | SSL expiry | 2027-01-17 | | Domain age | 0.34 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | 2027-06-22 | | Archive first seen | 2026-07-04 | | Archive snapshots | 1 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 10 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about vote-spectrafinance.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [stabble-dex.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/stabble-dex.vercel.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 18/100) - [drainer-web-2.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/drainer-web-2.vercel.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [emebercurve.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/emebercurve.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [embercurve.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/embercurve.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [airdrop-embercurve.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/airdrop-embercurve.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [trustwalletindia.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/trustwalletindia.vercel.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [firelight-voting.web.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/firelight-voting.web.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [asterdex-trading.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/asterdex-trading.vercel.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [hyperfoundation-holder.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hyperfoundation-holder.xyz), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [getbackevm.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/getbackevm.netlify.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 20/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26) - [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/vote-spectrafinance.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/vote-spectrafinance.app · assessed 2026-10-25.*