--- title: "Is voted-xaman.org a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "voted-xaman.org" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is voted-xaman.org a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/voted-xaman.org assessed: 2026-10-29 --- # Is voted-xaman.org a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** voted-xaman.org shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-29 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 19 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Listed as unsafe (Google) | Risk | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 4 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the voted-xaman.org homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/voted-xaman.org/screenshots/first.png) _What voted-xaman.org served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-29. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2026. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. The website voted-xaman.org is a single-page crypto-community landing site titled "Xaman – XRP Community Day | Vote & Claim Your Allocation". It uses the name of a well-known XRP wallet brand and invites visitors to take part in a community vote and claim a token allocation. Its apparent purpose is to draw visitors into a claim-style interaction. The page content was only partly captured, because an automated-access challenge stood in front of the page. The title and the page's behavior are therefore the main observable content. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk This assessment carries an explicitly cautionary posture because confirmed contradictions are present. Major security vendors and a browser-protection service currently flag the domain as malicious, and the browser-protection classification is social engineering. That is the category used for phishing and deceptive-lure sites. Together with an external blacklist finding, this makes the site **blacklisted** across several independent sources. The homepage combines a recognised wallet brand name with a "vote and claim your allocation" call to action. This lure pattern is common in crypto-claim campaigns that aim to push visitors toward wallet connection or credential disclosure. The site's identity could not be independently tied to the brand it evokes. The brand-linked wording therefore cannot be treated as evidence of any real association. In the behavioral sandbox, the page did not trigger wallet-connection prompts, drainer behavior, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms or cloaking. These absences do not offset the external threat findings. The page did issue several outbound data submissions to third-party destinations that are not on any recognised-service list, and it logged repeated script errors. A page this young that sends data to unrecognised external endpoints warrants treatment as a data-collection risk. No contradictory legal-entity names were observed, so the concern comes from threat detections and the nature of the lure, not from conflicting corporate identities. Evidence: - Homepage: the title offers a vote and an allocation claim under a recognised wallet brand name. - Domain provenance: registered 2026-07-07 (about 0.31 years, roughly four months old), with only 1 archive snapshot, dated 2026-08-07, and 1 year tracked. - Homepage behavior: 3 outbound POST requests to non-whitelisted external destinations out of 6 external XHR/fetch calls, plus 6 console errors across 3 sandbox runs. - Reputation: 19 security engines rated the domain malicious and 2 suspicious, including three leading vendors, and a browser-protection verdict of social engineering. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The captured page content did not allow any licensing, registration or legal-entity disclosure to be assessed. No regulated-entity status could be corroborated, and no third-party broker record matches the site. The site therefore has no recognised standing to which a claim of authority could be tied, and any financial or token-distribution activity it offers is unsupported by an observable regulatory basis. The domain is registered through a corporate registrar, Key-Systems GmbH. This is an administrative fact and does not offset the threat findings. The transport certificate is domain-validated only, so it proves control of the domain and says nothing about the identity of whoever operates it. Evidence: - Registration: registered 2026-07-07 through Key-Systems GmbH, with expiry 2027-07-07. - Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV), valid to 2026-12-03, with 35 days remaining. - Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US). - Third-party broker intelligence: no matching record. ### What to Verify Next Any claim of an XRP community vote or token allocation should be checked through the wallet brand's own announcements, reached by independently typed addresses or official social channels, never through links from this site. The site's contact channels should be confirmed through a separate, independent route. If a visitor already interacted with the site, wallet approvals should be reviewed and any suspicious permissions revoked. Credentials entered should be rotated, and wallet security teams or the relevant brand's support should be told. The domain can also be reported to the hosting provider and to browser-protection services, which helps takedown. Evidence: - Homepage: the allocation-claim framing is the lure that needs independent confirmation from the brand's official channels. - Behavior record: outbound submissions to unrecognised destinations mean any data entered may have left the page. - Reputation record: multiple independent flags justify reporting the domain to the hosting provider and to browser-protection services. ### Summary Verdict The site presents an elevated, high-risk posture. Independent threat intelligence confirms malicious classification, and this is reinforced by the domain's very recent creation, a minimal history and a lure typical of crypto-claim campaigns. Technical hygiene such as a valid certificate does not change that conclusion. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN/WAF and is served from AS13335. All observed addresses are edge servers, and the origin host was not observable. This protective layer is a mitigating factor only. It prevents independent confirmation of where the content is hosted, and it cannot offset the external threat detections. A valid DV certificate from WE1 confirms encrypted transport, not trustworthiness. ### Closing Assessment Treat the site as unsafe for any interaction involving wallets, logins, seed phrases, credentials or payments. Do not connect a wallet, sign a transaction or enter personal data. If the site was already visited, apply the remediation steps above promptly. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-29 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, registration and ownership, behaviour in a sandbox. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Hosting and network - The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`) ### 03 History in the web archive - The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`) ### 04 Registration and ownership - The registration record withholds contact details for the operator. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_HIDDEN`) ### 05 Behaviour in a sandbox - A large share of what the page loaded came from other domains. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_MODERATE`) - The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 15% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of voted-xaman.org. - The request stayed on voted-xaman.org. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - Registration is published under Key-Systems GmbH. (Clear) - DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted) - The registration is paid up to 2027-07-07. (Noted) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-08-07. (Clear) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Key-Systems GmbH | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:3033::ac43:c9f9 | | Name servers | brett.ns.cloudflare.com, raina.ns.cloudflare.com | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WE1 | | SSL expiry | 2026-12-03 | | Domain age | 0.31 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | 2027-07-07 | | Archive first seen | 2026-08-07 | | Archive snapshots | 1 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 19 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 1 match | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about voted-xaman.org at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [dcnvda.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dcnvda.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 19/100) - [bangabandhuonline.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bangabandhuonline.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [coffeecatcafe.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/coffeecatcafe.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [qualityexpressllc.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/qualityexpressllc.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [tptkn.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/tptkn.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [gninepal.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/gninepal.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [sriramkrishnasaradacollegeofeducation.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/sriramkrishnasaradacollegeofeducation.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [246bdb.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/246bdb.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [send-bep-usdt-bsc.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/send-bep-usdt-bsc.vercel.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 1/100) - [stabble-dex.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/stabble-dex.vercel.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 18/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26) - [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/voted-xaman.org) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/voted-xaman.org · assessed 2026-10-29.*