---
title: "Is votes-okxpolls-105.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "votes-okxpolls-105.pages.dev"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is votes-okxpolls-105.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Review, 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 45
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/votes-okxpolls-105.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-10-19
---

# Is votes-okxpolls-105.pages.dev a scam? 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** votes-okxpolls-105.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk

Assessed 2026-10-19 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 45%.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| What this site appears to be | Cloudflare-hosted interstitial page reporting the destination site as 'Suspected Phishing'. Advises enabling cookies and informs the visitor the site has been reported for potential phishing. Do not enter credentials or sensitive data on the underlying site. |

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 2 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the votes-okxpolls-105.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/votes-okxpolls-105.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What votes-okxpolls-105.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-19. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
- The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

The assessed address is a free-hosting subdomain on the pages.dev platform. Its hostname combines the words "votes", "okx" and "polls" with a numeric suffix, which reads like a crypto-themed voting or polling page. When analysed, it returned only a security interstitial headed "Suspected Phishing". The page states that the site has been reported for potential phishing, and it carries no products, forms, navigation, legal pages or business content of its own. Its apparent purpose is therefore not demonstrable from the page. The surrounding signals are consistent with a short-lived lure of the kind used to harvest credentials or wallet access.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present and weigh heavily. Multiple independent threat-intelligence engines classify the address as malicious or suspicious, including one tier-one security vendor. External blacklisting is confirmed, and the hosting platform's own protective layer has put the site behind a phishing warning. The hostname is also built to look like a polling or voting page connected to a well-known crypto exchange brand, hosted on a disposable subdomain rather than any brand-controlled domain. That is a common pattern in lures that ask visitors to "vote" or "claim" something by connecting a wallet or signing in. No explicit brand impersonation was confirmed in the page content, and no conflicting legal identities were observed, because the page presents no identity at all. The page-level analysis rates the content as high risk. It also flags a mismatch between what the site is presented as and what the evidence shows. Behavioural testing recorded heavy third-party request activity, a very large DOM change after interaction, repeated console errors, and a final destination that differed from the requested one. It classified the access gating as bot protection rather than deliberate cloaking. The behavioural tests found no wallet-connection attempts, clipboard hijacking, hidden forms or external password forms, but these were run against the interstitial, not the content it blocks. The site's real content therefore remains unassessed, and the absence of those behaviours cannot be read as reassurance. Evidence:

- Homepage: the only content retrieved is a "Suspected Phishing" warning stating the site "has been reported for potential phishing", with no site content behind it.
- Reputation: several independent threat-intelligence engines flag the address, and external blacklisting is confirmed.
- Hostname: a free-hosting subdomain embedding a crypto exchange keyword and a "polls" theme.
- Behavioural sandbox (3 runs): about 97% of requests were external, 1,508 DOM mutations followed interaction, there were 10 console errors, and the final destination did not match the requested one.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The page presents no legal, terms, privacy, about or contact pages, no company name, and no licence or registration claim. Because only a block page could be retrieved, no on-site disclosure can be evaluated, and the operator's real-world identity remains unverified. Ownership and governance are opaque. This is an opacity condition, not an identity contradiction, and it matters here only because it coincides with confirmed external threat detections. No third-party broker or regulatory-registry match was found for the site. This absence is neutral and does not constitute a regulatory finding. The site offers no financial service that could be matched against a licensing authority. Evidence:

- Homepage: no company name, legal entity, licence number or regulator reference is shown.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- Transport security: a domain-validated TLS certificate issued by YE2, valid to 2027-01-08. This confirms only an encrypted connection, not who operates the site.
- Broker intelligence: no match in the reputational dataset.

### What to Verify Next

Any message, advertisement or social post that directed a visitor to this address should be traced to its origin. The address should be compared with the official domain and verified social channels of the exchange brand it alludes to, using routes the visitor already trusts and not links supplied in the message. Any official poll, vote or reward programme should be confirmed on the brand's own website or app. If credentials, seed phrases or wallet approvals have already been submitted here, the affected accounts should be secured and wallet permissions revoked. The address should also be reported to the hosting platform and the relevant anti-phishing channels. Official support or contact channels should be confirmed independently, not through anything on this site. Evidence:

- Homepage: the platform warning advises against entering credentials or sensitive data on the underlying site.
- Hostname: the brand-style keywords sit on a generic hosting subdomain, not a domain controlled by the brand.
- Registry check: no licensing or registration claim exists to confirm, so verification must rest on the brand's official channels.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is high risk. Confirmed external threat detections, a platform-issued phishing warning, and adverse page and behavioural signals converge on a clearly adverse assessment. This outcome is driven by reputation and content evidence, and no sign of legitimacy offsets it. The operator's identity is unverified, and nothing available supports treating the site as a genuine voting or polling service.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, a mainstream and reputable provider, with many edge addresses and a couple of possible origin candidates observed. This shows only that the site is served through a well-run platform. It is a minor mitigating factor, and it does not establish legitimacy or offset the confirmed threat detections.


### Closing Assessment

The site should not be used for login, credential entry, wallet connection or any financial interaction. Passive viewing should be limited to the warning page, and nothing should be downloaded or approved. Anyone who has already interacted with the site should treat related accounts and wallets as potentially exposed and act on that immediately.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-19 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, page content, several checks together.

### 01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`)

### 02 Page content
- The review of the page content rated it high risk. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RISK_HIGH`)
- The page shows few of the signs expected from a trustworthy operator. (Page content `rule:PAGE_TRUST_QUALITY_LOW`)
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`)
- The page content shows at least one warning sign that deceptive sites commonly use. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RED_FLAGS_SOME`)

### 03 Several checks together
- Several independent checks pointed to risk at the same time. (Several checks together `rule:HYB_MULTIPLE_MODULES_HIGH_RISK`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |

- No on-site identity signals detected

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of votes-okxpolls-105.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on votes-okxpolls-105.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | Not available |
| Country | Not available |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2f6d |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Lookup incomplete |
| SSL issuer | YE2 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-01-08 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not available |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 2 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about votes-okxpolls-105.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [hibachiclaim.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hibachiclaim.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 17/100)
- [midenclaim.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/midenclaim.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 21/100)
- [boaclaim.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/boaclaim.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 18/100)
- [apes-verification.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/apes-verification.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 19/100)
- [giveaway-piggycoincom.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/giveaway-piggycoincom.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [uniswap-launchpads.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/uniswap-launchpads.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [etfswappresales.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/etfswappresales.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 4/100)
- [pimeru.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pimeru.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [evm-1006.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/evm-1006.vercel.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [crestag.site](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crestag.site), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 24, 2026: 15 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-24)
- [Fake Airdrop Sites Show a Number, Not a Transfer](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/fake-airdrop-sites-show-a-number-not-a-transfer)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/votes-okxpolls-105.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/votes-okxpolls-105.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-19.*