--- title: "Is votes-okxpolls-62.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "votes-okxpolls-62.pages.dev" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is votes-okxpolls-62.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Review, 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 55 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/votes-okxpolls-62.pages.dev assessed: 2026-10-20 --- # Is votes-okxpolls-62.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** votes-okxpolls-62.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-20 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%. | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | What this site appears to be | Cloudflare security interstitial stating that the requested website has been reported for potential phishing. It displays no service content, forms, or sensitive actions of the underlying site, and the destination cannot be independently verified from this capture. | ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 5 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YE1) | Noted | | Hosted by | CLOUDFLARENET (Server in US) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the votes-okxpolls-62.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/votes-okxpolls-62.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png) _What votes-okxpolls-62.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-20. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. - The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. This website is a subdomain on a free application-hosting platform whose name pairs "okx" with "votes" and "polls". Its only captured content is a Cloudflare "Suspected Phishing" interstitial stating that the requested site has been reported for potential phishing. The capture shows no products, forms, legal pages or contact details, so the operator's purpose and business model cannot be determined. The naming pattern, a well-known exchange brand paired with a voting or poll theme, is typical of campaigns that lure visitors into wallet or credential interactions. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Contradictory signals are present and serious. The domain is **blacklisted** by multiple independent threat-intelligence sources, and a major internet-security provider has placed a phishing warning in front of it. The domain label combines a recognised crypto-exchange brand name with a "votes/polls" theme on a free, shared hosting namespace, so the naming resembles brand-bait. The analysis did not confirm an impersonation, however. No conflicting legal identities were observed, and no on-page content was captured to show what the site does. The page that loaded was only the provider's block notice, and it contained no login form, hidden form or wallet-connection prompt. The sandbox runs recorded no wallet-drainer or clipboard-hijack behaviour, and the heavy outbound traffic seen was attributed to the warning page's own infrastructure. The blacklisting and the phishing report together are decisive, and the lack of captured content cannot be read as reassurance. Evidence: - Homepage capture: the Cloudflare warning page states that the site "has been reported for potential phishing" and displays no service content of the underlying site. - Third-party reputation: several security engines independently flag the domain as malicious or suspicious, and the overall reputation outcome is a confirmed blacklist hit. - Domain naming: the hostname combines an exchange brand name with "votes" and "polls" on a free pages-hosting namespace, a lookalike pattern to the hosting platform's own domain. - Behavioural testing: three successful sandbox runs showed no wallet-connection attempts, no hidden forms and no cloaking beyond standard bot protection. ### Regulatory Verification Notes No licence, registration number, legal entity name, terms page or privacy policy could be observed, because the only captured page is the warning interstitial. The site's real-world operator therefore cannot be connected to any identifiable company or person, and the identity remains unverified. No claim of regulation or authorisation exists to test, and no third-party broker-reputation record matches the domain. A site that is both blacklisted and anonymous gives no basis for treating any financial or voting-related claim as backed by a regulated entity. The reputational findings are covered above and are not repeated here. Evidence: - Homepage capture: no company name, licence, registration number or legal text appears; the content consists solely of the security warning. - Transport security: the TLS certificate is domain-validated only (DV), issued by YE1 and valid to 2027-01-07. This confirms encryption, not who operates the site. - Network origin: the domain resolves to AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US). - Broker reputation: no match was found in third-party broker datasets, so no external regulatory signal exists either way. ### What to Verify Next Any contact with this site should be preceded by establishing whether the intended counterparty actually uses it. Any "vote", "poll" or reward link attributed to the exchange brand should be checked against the brand's official announcements, which should be reached by typing the official address directly or through an independent route, never through the suspect link. Owners or administrators of the platform account hosting this subdomain, and the hosting provider's abuse desk, can confirm whether the project has been taken down or suspended. If the link arrived through a message, social post or advertisement, the sender and channel should be authenticated through a separate, trusted route. Organisations that have already seen traffic to this domain should review proxy and endpoint logs for visits and for any wallet approvals or credential entries. Evidence: - Homepage capture: the live content of the site was not viewable, so its claims cannot be compared with any official source. - Domain naming: the brand-plus-poll hostname is the only identity cue available, and it requires comparison against the brand's official channels. - Reputation findings: the blacklist and phishing report mean any past visits warrant retrospective review. ### Summary Verdict The assessment is critically adverse and clearly cautionary. Convergent external threat intelligence and a provider-level phishing warning outweigh every technical hygiene indicator. The site's operator and purpose remain unknown, and the site is classed as unsafe for any sensitive interaction. At most it can be treated as a threat indicator to be analysed in isolation. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site is fronted by Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and all four observed addresses are Cloudflare edge servers. The origin server is not observable. The hosting reputation is clean and the TLS certificate is valid, but these are mitigating factors only. Edge-only visibility prevents independent confirmation of where the content is actually served from. Protective infrastructure is shared, widely available and used by legitimate and malicious sites alike, so it cannot offset the external threat findings. ### Closing Assessment The domain should not be visited, and no credentials, wallet approvals, seed phrases or payments should be entered. Any link that leads here should be treated as hostile and reported to the platform or channel that delivered it. It can be blocked at the network or email-filter level, and anyone who has already interacted with it should revoke wallet permissions and change affected passwords without delay. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, page content, several checks together, registration and ownership. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Page content - The review of the page content rated it high risk. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RISK_HIGH`) - The page shows few of the signs expected from a trustworthy operator. (Page content `rule:PAGE_TRUST_QUALITY_LOW`) - The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`) ### 03 Several checks together - Several independent checks pointed to risk at the same time. (Several checks together `rule:HYB_MULTIPLE_MODULES_HIGH_RISK`) ### 04 Registration and ownership - The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNVERIFIED | | Identity score | 30/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 50% | - No on-site identity signals detected _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of votes-okxpolls-62.pages.dev. - The request stayed on votes-okxpolls-62.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2f42 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | YE1 | | SSL expiry | 2027-01-07 | | Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | Not available | | Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 5 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about votes-okxpolls-62.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [giveaway-piggycoincom.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/giveaway-piggycoincom.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [uniswap-launchpads.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/uniswap-launchpads.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [etfswappresales.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/etfswappresales.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 4/100) - [pimeru.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pimeru.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [hive-keychain.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hive-keychain.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [p1inch.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/p1inch.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [zeta-x.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/zeta-x.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [flying-fse.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/flying-fse.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [starknet-plum.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/starknet-plum.vercel.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [limitedsessions056.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/limitedsessions056.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 17/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26) - [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/votes-okxpolls-62.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/votes-okxpolls-62.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-20.*