---
title: "Is votes-okxpolls-79.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "votes-okxpolls-79.pages.dev"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is votes-okxpolls-79.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Review, 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/votes-okxpolls-79.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-10-20
---

# Is votes-okxpolls-79.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** votes-okxpolls-79.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-20 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| What this site appears to be | Kiwi.com crypto exchange page where users enter a token contract address to vote on whether it gets listed, earning XP and Kiwi rewards. The page also links to buying, trading, learning and corporate or legal pages, and cites MFSA CASP authorisation in Malta. |

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 1 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Listed as unsafe (Google) | Risk |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 7 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the votes-okxpolls-79.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/votes-okxpolls-79.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What votes-okxpolls-79.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-20. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Google flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a single-page crypto "token voting" site served from a free-hosting subdomain on the pages.dev platform. It invites visitors to paste a token contract address, vote on whether the token should be listed on an exchange, and earn "XP" and "Kiwi" rewards. It presents itself as part of the Kiwi.com crypto exchange, with navigation to deposit, trading, P2P, earn, trading-bot, institutional and affiliate/API pages. Its apparent purpose is to funnel visitors toward exchange account creation and activity through a community-engagement feature, but the hostname does not match the brand the page displays.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Hard contradictions are present. A major browser-security reputation service currently flags the site under a social-engineering classification, and a second external detection source corroborates this, with one engine rating it malicious and another suspicious. Together these constitute a confirmed **blacklist** condition, and they were decisive in the assessment. No phishing kit, credential form, wallet-connection routine, clipboard manipulation or cloaking was observed, and no conflicting legal entities appear. The concern is therefore the combination of a hostname and page branding that do not match, a brand-new domain, and a token-voting mechanic. The hostname suggests a different exchange brand's "polls", while the page content presents itself as Kiwi.com. Entering arbitrary contract addresses, a "Try an example: BONK" prompt, a "Token Discovery" feed of live tokens and rewards for YES votes are common lures for steering users toward promoted tokens and, later, wallet or exchange sign-ups. In the sandbox, the page also issued several outbound data submissions and background requests to destinations outside the expected set. Their purpose is not established, but they add to the unresolved risk on a page that has no visible form.


Evidence:
- The homepage's title and body present a Kiwi.com token-voting experience with "Vote on token listings. Earn XP." and "YES votes earn Kiwi for exclusive perks", while the hostname references a different brand's polls.
- The domain was registered in 2026 and is only about 8 days old (about 0.02 years).
- The web archive holds 1 snapshot, first and last seen 2026-10-11, covering 1 year tracked.
- During three sandbox runs, the homepage generated 3 outbound POST requests and 6 background requests to non-whitelisted external destinations (9 non-whitelisted of 12 external requests).

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The homepage footer states that a Europe-based limited entity operating under the trade name is authorised as a Crypto-Asset Services Provider by the Maltese regulator under Article 28 of the Markets in Crypto-Assets Act. The sentence is garbled and names no company, and the page gives no authorisation number or link to a regulator register. This on-page claim does not establish that the operator behind this hostname holds that authorisation. Operator identity remains unverified, and ownership and governance are opaque. Neither a legal entity name nor an address appears on the page, and the legal links (terms, privacy, disclosures, formal complaints) are only labels in the navigation. There is no third-party broker-database match for the site. A regulatory claim on a flagged, days-old hostname should be treated as an unverified assertion, not a mitigating factor.


Evidence:
- The homepage footer cites the Maltese crypto-asset authorisation without naming an entity or giving a licence number.
- The site is served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- The TLS certificate is domain-validated only (DV), issued by YE1 and valid to 2027-01-07 (79 days remaining). It confirms encryption, not operator identity.
- The footer shows "© 2017 - 2025 KIWI.COM", which conflicts with a domain created in 2026 on a free subdomain platform.

### What to Verify Next

Independent verification should start from the genuine exchange's own channels, not this site. Confirm the official domain of the brand named on the page by typing it directly into the browser or using a bookmark, then check whether the exchange operates a token-voting feature at all and under which address. Check the Maltese regulator's public register for the authorised entity and compare the registered name and website with this hostname. Where the exchange publishes a channel-verification or official-links page, use it to confirm the voting feature and contact channels through a route that does not pass through this site.


Evidence:
- The homepage footer offers a "Channel verification" link whose destination on this host cannot be treated as authoritative.
- The footer authorisation statement can be compared against the regulator's public register.
- The reputation-service flag and the hostname/brand mismatch make this site an unreliable source for confirming its own identity.

### Summary Verdict

The site carries a clearly elevated risk posture. Active external threat detections are the decisive factor, and the content features that would normally support legitimacy (rich page content, consistent branding on the page, continuous short-term archive presence) cannot offset them. The operator's identity is unverified, and the site is not suitable for any sensitive interaction.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is delivered through Cloudflare's CDN and web application firewall, and all four observed addresses are edge addresses, so the origin server was not observable. The TLS certificate is valid and the hosting provider is mainstream. This is a mitigating factor only. Free pages.dev hosting is trivially available to any party, edge-only visibility prevents independent hosting verification, and content can be swapped quickly behind it. Protective infrastructure cannot offset the external threat detections.


### Closing Assessment

Do not log in, enter credentials, connect a wallet, submit token contract addresses tied to accounts, or make any deposit or payment through this site. If the feature is of interest, reach the exchange only through its independently confirmed official address. Anyone who has already interacted with this page should change any reused passwords, review wallet approvals, and report the page to the exchange's security team.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, page content, behaviour in a sandbox.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)

### 03 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`)

### 04 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`)

### 05 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |

- No on-site identity signals detected

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of votes-okxpolls-79.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on votes-okxpolls-79.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-11. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2d2b |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | YE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-01-07 |
| Domain age | 0.02 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2026-10-11 |
| Archive snapshots | 1 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 1 match |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about votes-okxpolls-79.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [votes-hyperswaps-com.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/votes-hyperswaps-com.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 25/100)
- [revoes.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/revoes.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [xexchanger.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/xexchanger.pages.dev), a similar name (Moderate Trust, 52/100)
- [sale-creator-bid.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/sale-creator-bid.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 22/100)
- [unich-quests-net.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/unich-quests-net.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [innovateprotoclls.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/innovateprotoclls.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [matchaxyz-email-promo.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/matchaxyz-email-promo.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 9/100)
- [telcoins-bank-com.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/telcoins-bank-com.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portswaps-hub.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portswaps-hub.xyz), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [loyalty-xrpl.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/loyalty-xrpl.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23)
- [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/votes-okxpolls-79.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/votes-okxpolls-79.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-20.*
