---
title: "Is voting-flap.info a Scam? Trust Score 4/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "voting-flap.info"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is voting-flap.info a Scam? Risk Report, Score 4/100"
trust_score: 4
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/voting-flap.info
assessed: 2026-10-27
---

# Is voting-flap.info a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 4/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 4/100.** voting-flap.info shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-27 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 17 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Listed as unsafe (Google) | Risk |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 3 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |
| Hosted by | CLOUDFLARENET (Server in US) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the voting-flap.info homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/voting-flap.info/screenshots/first.png)

_What voting-flap.info served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-27. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Google, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a single-page token-launch platform whose homepage is titled "Flap: Instantly Launch and Trade Your Own Token". It presents a self-service way to create and trade a cryptocurrency token at once. Its apparent purpose is to draw visitors into token creation and trading, a model that normally depends on wallet interaction and financial commitment.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present and decisive. The site is **blacklisted**: a major browser safe-browsing service classifies it as a social-engineering threat, and a large cluster of independent security engines, including several tier-one vendors, flag it as malicious. Together these hits meet the threshold for a confirmed blacklist. No conflicting legal entities were observed, so there is no identity contradiction in the strict sense. The contradiction here is reputational and severe. The domain was registered only a few months ago and carries a name built around "voting-flap" while the page presents a token-launch product under the "Flap" name. This is the profile that commonly accompanies disposable fraud infrastructure, and it sits alongside an unverified claim of "instant" token creation. Automated sandbox runs of the homepage showed no outbound data transfers, no wallet-connection attempts, no clipboard manipulation and no cloaking. That is a mild mitigating observation about the captured page. It does not offset the external detections, because malicious behavior can be gated behind later user actions or swapped in after capture. Evidence:

- The homepage presents a token-creation and trading proposition ("Instantly Launch and Trade Your Own Token") with no corroborating operator identity.
- The safe-browsing classification for the domain is social engineering, which means deceptive content aimed at inducing user action.
- Domain registered 2026-07-15 (~0.28 years, about three months old), which is recent for a platform asking for financial trust.
- Sandbox: three successful homepage runs, zero external requests, no wallet-connection, clipboard or hidden-form activity detected.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The captured page discloses no legal entity, license, registration number or regulatory standing, and no third-party regulatory source was matched. Ownership is opaque, and the registrant details are withheld or incomplete. This is ownership opacity, not an identity contradiction. A platform offering token issuance and trading would ordinarily be expected to show corporate and compliance details, and none is visible on the page. This gap is a verification matter and is not proof of fraud. The decisive concern is the external threat detections described above. No broker-reputation record matched this domain. The transport encryption is a valid certificate, but a domain-validated one only confirms control of the domain and says nothing about the operator. Evidence:

- Domain registered through NICENIC International Group Co., Limited on 2026-07-15, expiring 2027-07-15; registrant details are incomplete.
- Served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV), valid to 2026-12-11.
- The homepage lists no company name, license or regulator reference.

### What to Verify Next

No credential, wallet or payment interaction should be considered until the external detections are cleared. Independent steps include checking whether any named, registered company actually operates a token-launch service under this brand, using only contact channels and official sources found offline or through a trusted directory. Confirm with the relevant financial or virtual-asset regulator whether any entity is authorised to offer token issuance or trading services. Re-check the domain's safe-browsing and security-engine status after a period, since delisting would be the key change in risk. Compare the domain against any known official platform using the "Flap" name, to establish whether this site is an authorised property or a lookalike. Evidence:

- The domain's registration is about three months old, so there is no long operating history to rely on.
- The page gives no verifiable registry or license identifier to confirm.
- The social-engineering classification and the broad engine detections are the signals whose removal would change the assessment.

### Summary Verdict

The site carries an elevated, high-risk posture. Strong external threat detections converge with a very new domain and an absence of any verifiable operator, so the evidence does not support treating it as legitimate. Clean sandbox behavior and a valid certificate are noted but do not change this conclusion.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is fronted by Cloudflare, a mainstream CDN and WAF provider in the US. All four observed addresses are CDN edge addresses, and the true origin server was not observable. That edge-only visibility prevents independent verification of where the content is actually hosted. It can also mask rapid content swaps behind a stable-looking front. The protective infrastructure is a mitigating factor only and cannot offset the external reputation risk.


### Closing Assessment

At most, the site should be viewed passively. No login, credential entry, wallet connection, token purchase or other financial interaction is appropriate, and nothing should be downloaded from it. Anyone who has already interacted with it should treat any connected wallet or entered credentials as potentially exposed.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered between three and six months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_YOUNG_6M`)

### 03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of voting-flap.info.

- The request stayed on voting-flap.info. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- Registration is published under NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED. (Clear)
- DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted)
- The registration is paid up to 2027-07-15. (Noted)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:3031::ac43:9882 |
| Name servers | bill.ns.cloudflare.com, serenity.ns.cloudflare.com |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-11 |
| Domain age | 0.28 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-07-15 |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 17 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 1 match |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about voting-flap.info at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [xrphai.info](https://trustsniffer.com/report/xrphai.info), another .info site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [axiomprotocols-rlusd.info](https://trustsniffer.com/report/axiomprotocols-rlusd.info), another .info site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [hegelive.info](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hegelive.info), another .info site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [fomodog.info](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fomodog.info), another .info site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 3/100)
- [sngastron.info](https://trustsniffer.com/report/sngastron.info), another .info site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [exponentbridge.info](https://trustsniffer.com/report/exponentbridge.info), another .info site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [aave-fi.info](https://trustsniffer.com/report/aave-fi.info), another .info site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [anzaskr.info](https://trustsniffer.com/report/anzaskr.info), another .info site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [tronscanerc.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/tronscanerc.pages.dev), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [governance-octra.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/governance-octra.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 24, 2026: 15 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-24)
- [Fake Airdrop Sites Show a Number, Not a Transfer](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/fake-airdrop-sites-show-a-number-not-a-transfer)
- [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/voting-flap.info) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/voting-flap.info · assessed 2026-10-27.*