--- title: "Is votings-virtual.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "votings-virtual.pages.dev" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is votings-virtual.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Review, 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 55 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/votings-virtual.pages.dev assessed: 2026-10-27 --- # Is votings-virtual.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** votings-virtual.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-27 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 4 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted | | Hosted by | CLOUDFLARENET (Server in US) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the votings-virtual.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/votings-virtual.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png) _What votings-virtual.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-27. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Overview This website is a page served from a free shared-hosting subdomain. Its title and content present it as "Create, co-own, interact with AI Agents | Virtuals Protocol", an AI-agent and crypto-token platform. The captured homepage is very short, and the site's apparent purpose is to pose as a gateway to that third-party protocol's agent-creation and co-ownership services. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk The assessment is clearly cautionary. Several independent threat-intelligence engines currently flag the site as malicious or suspicious, and the site is **blacklisted** according to external reputation sources. A known-phishing indicator also feeds the elevated assessment. No conflicting legal entities appear, but the reputation hits alone are enough to treat the site as a probable lookalike front for a well-known AI-agent and token project. The homepage carries that project's name in its title. It is served from a generic, disposable-style subdomain rather than from any domain the project itself would be expected to operate. Pages like this are a common vehicle for wallet-lure and credential-harvesting campaigns around trending crypto brands. The browsing sandbox observed no wallet-connection prompts, no wallet-drainer behaviour, no clipboard manipulation and no hidden forms. It also saw no content cloaking. These are mitigating facts, but they do not offset the reputation findings. The page also made heavy external request traffic, including several calls to destinations outside the commonly recognized set, and logged repeated console errors. That pattern fits a thin front-end that pulls its behaviour from elsewhere, and it allows content or behaviour to change without notice. Evidence: - Homepage: the page title reuses the branding of a third-party AI-agent protocol, but the site runs on a shared free-hosting subdomain with no independently established link to that project. - Homepage: only a very small amount of text was captured, so the page offers little substantive product or company information. - Browsing sandbox: 15 external XHR/fetch requests and 3 external POSTs were observed, 3 requests went to non-whitelisted destinations, and 3 console errors were logged. No wallet-drainer, clipboard-hijack, hidden-form or cloaking behaviour was detected. - External reputation: 4 engines rated the site malicious and 2 suspicious, and it was independently blacklisted. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The captured homepage does not state a legal entity, license, registration number or regulatory status, so no regulated status can be attributed to it. The platform whose branding it uses may have legitimate disclosures of its own, but nothing on this page ties the site to them. This is a disclosure gap on its own and not evidence of fraud, but it adds to the reputation findings. The operator behind the subdomain stays opaque. The site's valid transport encryption confirms only that the connection is encrypted, not who runs the site. Evidence: - Homepage: no company name, license, registration identifier or contact details were present in the captured content. - Hosting: served from AS13335 (CLOUDFLARENET, Cloudflare, Inc., US) on a shared platform subdomain. - Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV, domain validation only), valid to 2026-12-14 (47 days remaining). ### What to Verify Next Before any interaction, the project that this page's title names should be contacted through its officially published channels, such as its known primary website and verified social accounts. The goal is to confirm whether this address is operated or endorsed by that project. The site should not be reached through links from social posts, messages or advertisements. Any wallet, token or login request tied to this address should be treated as unconfirmed until the project itself confirms the address, and a security team can submit the address to its organisation's phishing-reporting channel. Evidence: - Homepage: the site's AI-agent and co-ownership claims cannot be validated from the page itself. - Hosting: the shared subdomain gives no organisational identity that could be checked independently. - Reputation: multiple engines flagging the site makes official-channel confirmation the only reliable route. ### Summary Verdict The available evidence supports a high-risk posture. Active third-party threat detections and the lookalike presentation outweigh the ordinary technical hygiene the site shows. No independent evidence ties it to the project whose name it displays, and the reputation signals are decisive. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN/WAF, hosted under AS13335 in the United States (ARIN registry). All four observed addresses are edge nodes, and the origin server was not observable. A valid DV certificate and a recognized issuer are present. This infrastructure is a mitigating factor only. Edge-only visibility prevents independent verification of where the content actually originates and can mask quick content swaps. It cannot offset the external threat detections. ### Closing Assessment The site should be treated as unsafe for any login, credential entry, wallet connection or financial action. At most, it should be viewed passively, ideally from an isolated environment. The page's use of a third-party brand name should not be taken as proof of association, and the address should be reported if it was received through an unsolicited link. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox - A large share of what the page loaded came from other domains. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_MODERATE`) - The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`) ### 03 Registration and ownership - The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of votings-virtual.pages.dev. - The request stayed on votings-virtual.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2cb1 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WE1 | | SSL expiry | 2026-12-14 | | Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | Not available | | Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 4 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about votings-virtual.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [votes-okxpolls-105.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/votes-okxpolls-105.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [vote-polls954.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/vote-polls954.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [kuroro-xyz.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/kuroro-xyz.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 2/100) - [coincomms.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/coincomms.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 4/100) - [fpxy.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fpxy.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 22/100) - [h1-34c.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/h1-34c.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [rmwproperty-smartcontract.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/rmwproperty-smartcontract.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [polyperps.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/polyperps.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [rongbachkim686.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/rongbachkim686.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [psychsydney.com.au](https://trustsniffer.com/report/psychsydney.com.au), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23) - [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/votings-virtual.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/votings-virtual.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-27.*