WHEN WE
GET IT WRONG.
We work hard to be accurate, but no assessment is perfect. This is how we correct mistakes, across research articles, website reports, and wallet verdicts, and how to tell us when something looks wrong.
Fix it, and keep it on the record.
When we learn that something we published is materially wrong, we correct it promptly. We don't quietly erase the record: a correction is made visible so anyone who saw the original can see what changed. This applies to everything we publish, articles, website risk reports, wallet risk verdicts, and the Risk Index.
By what we published.
Corrected or retracted
A factual error in an article is corrected in place. If a piece can't stand, it is retracted: a visible withdrawal notice replaces it at its original address and it's removed from our listings, so the correction stays on the record rather than vanishing.
Re-assessed as evidence changes
Website and wallet verdicts are not frozen. They update as new evidence and on-chain events arrive, and a re-analysis can raise or lower a result. If you believe a verdict is inaccurate, you can ask us to review it.
Aggregates follow the data
The Risk Index reflects the underlying records at the time it was generated. When those records are corrected, the aggregates it produces move with them on the next refresh.
Think a result is wrong?
Tell us. Email contact@trustsniffer.com (or security@trustsniffer.com for a security issue). To help us review it quickly, include:
The exact link
The report URL, wallet address, domain, or article involved.
What looks wrong
Which part you believe is inaccurate, and why.
Any evidence
Links or records that support the correction, if you have them.
We review reports as soon as we can and act on genuine errors. Submitting a report doesn't guarantee a specific outcome, but every substantiated correction is made.
What a correction is, and isn't.
It's about accuracy. Corrections address factual errors and evidence, a wrong figure, a mislabeled address, an outdated claim.
A changed verdict isn't an error. A result moving as new evidence arrives is the engine working as intended, not a mistake being corrected.
Still informational. A corrected verdict remains a probabilistic risk assessment, not a legal determination. See our disclaimer.
How we work. Our standards for producing content are in our editorial policy.
Spotted something off?
Send us the link and what looks wrong, we'll take a look.