Is amlscan-trc20.vercel.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

Security Alert

Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

AmlScan TRC20 is a single-page web service that presents itself as a TRON/TRC20 anti-money-laundering compliance tool. It says it screens wallet addresses and USDT TRC20 transactions for sanctions exposure, mixer activity and other on-chain risk indicators. The homepage advertises a free first check and a flat $1 for each check after that. It also offers a sample report, downloadable PDF reports, address monitoring, and bulk/API and enterprise plans priced on request. It runs as pay-per-check software and asks visitors to connect a TRON wallet to use it.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

This site carries a confirmed adverse reputation. It is currently blacklisted by multiple independent security-detection sources, and several well-established security vendors are among those that flag it as malicious. That is the decisive risk factor. The site's protective hosting and valid encryption do not offset it. The homepage's wallet-connection flow compounds the exposure. It lists a dozen or more wallet brands, including TronLink, MetaMask, Ledger, Binance Web3 Wallet and OKX. It prompts visitors to accept a connection request and sign a transaction. Its FAQ reassures visitors that "we never have access to your funds", but nothing on the page lets that assurance be checked. The payment recipient and payment method for the $1 checks are never stated. Visitors would be asked to authorise wallet activity without knowing who receives the money. The site markets itself as regulator-grade sanctions screening aligned with international AML standards. Yet it names no legal entity and gives no business address. It also does not say which sanctions lists or data sources it screens against. That gap between the compliance claims and the supporting evidence is the main content-level red flag. Two further points are weaker. The site runs on a subdomain of a shared application-hosting platform, and its name was flagged as strongly resembling that platform's own domain. This is a similarity flag only, and no impersonation was confirmed. The site also sent a notable share of its network requests to third-party destinations. These included several data submissions to destinations outside the platform's known services. The sandbox saw no wallet-drainer behaviour, clipboard tampering, cloaking or hidden forms. A large number of abuse reports exist against the shared platform address the site resolves to. Those reports are attributed to the platform's shared infrastructure and have been discounted. They are not evidence against this site's operator. Evidence:

• Homepage and reputation checks: 17 security engines flagged the site as malicious and 2 as suspicious, with at least three tier-one vendors among them.
• Homepage wallet-connect prompt and FAQ: wallet-connection and transaction-signing flow with an unverifiable "we never have access to your funds" assurance, and no stated payment recipient.
• Domain registration: the domain is approximately 28 days old (about 0.08 years), consistent with a newly stood-up service making compliance claims.
• Web archive: 1 snapshot, dated 2026, so there is effectively no historical track record.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The homepage is the only substantive page. It carries standard disclaimers and plain pricing, but it discloses no operating company, registered address or named officers. It claims sanctions screening and AML alignment, yet it cites no licence, registration number or regulator, and it names no screening data provider. A tool that markets itself as compliance infrastructure would ordinarily be expected to disclose these. Their absence leaves the compliance claims unsupported and prevents the real-world operator from being connected to the service. Identity is therefore unverified, and any legitimacy suggested by the page is purely on-site assertion. No third-party broker or regulatory-database match was found. That finding is neutral on its own and does not affect the reputational concerns above. Evidence:

• Homepage content: regulator-style and FATF-aligned claims appear with no named legal entity, address or sanctions-source details.
• Homepage pricing section: the payment method and recipient are not stated, and enterprise and API pricing is "on contact" only.
• Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).
• Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WR1 (domain-validated only), valid to 2026-11-27 (36 days remaining). A DV certificate confirms control of the domain, not the identity of the operator.

What to Verify Next

Any reliance on this service should be preceded by independent confirmation of who operates it. The operator should be identified through an official company registry, with a named entity matched to a verifiable address. The compliance claims should be checked against the relevant AML or virtual-asset service-provider registers. The sanctions-screening methodology should be confirmed through documentation obtained directly from a verified provider, not from this page. Official contact and payment channels should be confirmed through an independent, offline route. If an AML screening need exists, an established, registered screening provider with a verifiable corporate identity should be used instead. Evidence:

• Homepage: no named entity, licence or address is available to check, so verification must start from outside the site.
• Homepage pricing and wallet flow: payment instructions do not identify the recipient, so the destination of any funds cannot be established from the site.
• Reputation findings: the adverse detections should be re-checked with the detecting security vendors before any engagement, to see whether the listing has been cleared.

Summary Verdict

The overall posture is high-risk. The site's reputation outcome is decisive, and it is reinforced by a very recent, unestablished footprint and compliance claims that cannot be substantiated. The site's operator cannot be linked to any verifiable real-world identity. No contradiction in legal names was found, so the concern rests on the adverse security findings and the lack of evidence behind the site's claims, not on an identity conflict.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site is served from Amazon-hosted address space, with all observed addresses belonging to edge servers of a recognised application-hosting and CDN provider. That is a mitigating factor only. It indicates mainstream, professionally operated hosting and a valid, known-issuer certificate. The origin server was not observable. Shared edge hosting also means that content can change quickly and that the infrastructure's reputation is shared among many unrelated tenants. This infrastructure does not offset the reputation risk and provides no assurance about the operator.

Closing Assessment

Interaction should be limited to passive viewing. The site should not be used to connect a wallet, sign transactions, make payments or submit credentials until a verified operator identity is established and the security listings are cleared.

Signals weighed against the site

• AbuseIPDB: 84 reports on hosting IP 216.198.79.3 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.