Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
amlview.org shows high-risk / scam indicators.
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 10 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 11% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 6 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | 4 months oldMost scam domains are under a year old | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 20261 snapshot | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by YR1 | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
This website presents itself as "AML View," a free anti-money-laundering checker for TRON-network USDT. Its homepage offers TRC20 wallet screening and a risk score, and it carries substantial text content. Its apparent purpose is to attract users who want to screen cryptocurrency wallet addresses for illicit-fund exposure, probably as a lead-in to other services.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
This is the most serious area of the assessment, and contradictory signals are present. The domain is on a confirmed blacklist. Three major endpoint-security vendors independently flag it as malicious, and a wider set of reputation engines return malicious or suspicious detections. The reputation evidence is strong enough that the site's other positive technical attributes cannot offset it. Hosting-level abuse reports against the server's address are also present (reports in the last few days, in categories relevant to web abuse). Because the address belongs to a shared hosting provider, these reports are attributed to shared infrastructure and are not proof of the site operator's conduct. They are an aggravating context, not a standalone finding.
No brand impersonation or conflicting legal identities were observed, and no phishing form was detected. The sandboxed browser sessions found no wallet-drainer behavior, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms, or content cloaking. The behavioral picture is still uneven. Roughly three-quarters of peak network activity went to external destinations, including several background requests and data submissions to non-whitelisted third-party endpoints, and the page logged console errors. A wallet-screening tool invites users to submit wallet addresses. On a blacklisted site with undisclosed ownership, that data could be harvested, linked to other activity, or misused to build false credibility. The site's free "risk score" output cannot be taken as an independent compliance determination. The domain is also very recent, and the site gave the web archive only a single capture. This leaves no track record to counter the detections.
- Homepage and domain-level reputation: multiple major security vendors currently flag the domain as malicious, and the external blacklist check is positive.
- Domain registered 2026-07-02 (~0.32 years old), well inside the period in which newly registered domains are statistically most abused.
- Web archive shows 1 snapshot, captured 2026-07-30, so there is no multi-year history to review.
- Browser sandbox, homepage: 12 external background requests and 12 external data submissions, 3 of each to non-whitelisted destinations, with 3 console errors, and no wallet-drainer or cloaking behavior.
Regulatory Verification Notes
No third-party regulatory source or registry listing could be matched to the site, and the homepage's on-page disclosure of operator identity, legal entity, and licensing is unclear. The site presents a compliance-flavored service (AML screening), so users would normally expect clear corporate identification and a statement of what standard the risk score is based on. Neither is established. Ownership and governance opacity are both present and compound the reputational concerns; here they are an administrative limitation, not an identity contradiction. No broker-reputation dataset returned a match, so there is no third-party broker signal either way. This is a verification gap in itself. The decisive concern remains the reputation evidence above.
- Domain registered through the registrar Atak Domain Bilgi Teknolojileri, with registration running to 2027-07-02; no operator identity is published in a form that could be independently connected to a real-world entity.
- Hosted on AS59692 (IQWeb FZ-LLC, United Arab Emirates, RIPE registry), a data-center and web-hosting network.
- TLS certificate issued by YR1 (domain-validated, DV), valid to 2026-12-22 with 57 days remaining. A DV certificate confirms only control of the domain and says nothing about the operator.
- Homepage: no regulator registration, licensing statement, or named legal entity was identified.
What to Verify Next
The site should not be treated as a trusted compliance tool until the blacklisting is resolved. Anyone with a business need to examine the domain should do so in an isolated, non-production environment and should not submit wallet addresses, credentials, or any sensitive data. If the service is to be used at all, its operator should be identified through an independent route, and the provenance and methodology behind the risk score should be established. Official contact channels should be confirmed independently, not through the site. A reputable, established, regulated blockchain analytics provider is a safer alternative for AML screening. Re-checking the domain's reputation status after the operator provides evidence of remediation would show whether the listings have been cleared.
- Reputation status: the current blacklist and malicious detections must be cleared before any engagement is reconsidered.
- Homepage: the origin and methodology of the "free" risk score are not independently documented.
- Registration record: the domain's registration is about four months old, so there is no historical operating record to rely on.
Summary Verdict
The available evidence supports a clearly cautionary, high-risk posture. Reputation data from multiple sources is decisive, and the site's technical hygiene and the absence of observed impersonation do not offset it. The operator's real-world identity is unverified and cannot be inferred from the site's own claims. Safe use is limited to passive, read-only observation.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site is served from a single IP address on a commercial data-center hosting network in the United Arab Emirates. No CDN or WAF layer was detected, so no protective infrastructure mitigates exposure or buffers abuse. The site resolves cleanly and answered consistently across sandbox runs, but this shows only that it is operational. The valid TLS certificate encrypts traffic but is not evidence of legitimacy.
Closing Assessment
Account login, credential entry, wallet-address submission, and any financial interaction with this site should be avoided. Organizations should consider blocking or flagging the domain in their security tooling until its reputation status changes and the operator is independently identified.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-25 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.
01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
02 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D
03 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new.History in the web archive
rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE
04 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH - The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS
05 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete.Registration and ownership
rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE
Signals weighed against the site
- AbuseIPDB: 6 reports on hosting IP 186.2.175.35 (IQWeb FZ-LLC, Data Center/Web Hosting/Transit), 11% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.
Identity verification
| Status | UNKNOWN |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |
- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of amlview.org.
- The request stayed on amlview.org. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- Registration is published under Atak Domain Bilgi Teknolojileri A._.. Clear
- DNS for this domain is served by trustname.com, across 2 name servers. Noted
- The registration is paid up to 2027-07-02. Noted
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-07-30. Clear
- It is hosted on IQWEB, from a server in AE. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Atak Domain Bilgi Teknolojileri A._. |
|---|---|
| Hosting | IQWEB - IQWeb FZ-LLC, AE |
| Country | AE |
| Server IP | 186.2.175.35 |
| Name servers | zeus.trustname.com, ares.trustname.com |
| CDN / edge network | Not detected |
| Resolved IP addresses | 1 |
| Edge IP addresses | 0 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 1 |
| SSL issuer | YR1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-22 |
| Domain age | 0.32 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-07-02 |
| Archive first seen | 2026-07-30 |
| Archive snapshots | 1 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 10 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 11% confidence, 6 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about amlview.org at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.