Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
app-aim-bot.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 15 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | 1.9 years oldRegistered history | Clear |
| Web archive | Archived since 202415 snapshots | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by WE1 | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2024.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
This website is a single-page web application titled "Aimbot – AI Portfolio". It is served from a free, shared subdomain of a developer page-hosting platform, not from a dedicated branded domain. It presents itself to visitors as an AI-themed portfolio or tooling front end. Its commercial purpose and operator are not established by the captured content.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
Contradictory signals are present and decisive. Well over a dozen independent security engines classify the site as malicious, including several top-tier vendors. This has produced a confirmed blacklist listing from external reputation sources. Historical reputation records also associate the address with phishing activity. That association is a soft historical signal, not a confirmed active phishing page. No conflicting legal identities and no brand impersonation were observed. The risk therefore rests on the external threat listing, not on anything the page claims about itself. The site's own runtime behavior was comparatively benign. Repeated sessions showed no wallet-connection prompts, no clipboard manipulation, no hidden or credential-harvesting forms, no cloaking and no suspicious inline scripts. A large share of page activity consists of calls to third-party services, but all of them go to recognised destinations. This does not offset the threat listing. Content on a throwaway subdomain can change quickly, so a clean snapshot today does not guarantee clean content tomorrow. The name "Aimbot" and the "AI portfolio" framing could attract users interested in trading bots or automated investment tools. That is a recognised lure pattern, but the captured content does not show a specific financial product or yield claim, so none is asserted here.
- Homepage: the title reads "Aimbot – AI Portfolio", and the page returned a stable response across three behavioral sessions with no cloaking, wallet-drainer or clipboard-write activity.
- Homepage network behavior: 74 external requests were observed, and none were directed at non-whitelisted destinations. No external form posts were made.
- Domain provenance: the domain is approximately 1.9 years old, with 15 archive snapshots spanning 2024–2026 (3 years tracked, first captured 2024-09-23).
- Reputation: 15 engines returned malicious verdicts and 2 returned suspicious verdicts, including three tier-one security vendors. Safe Browsing did not flag the site.
Regulatory Verification Notes
Neither a legal entity nor any licensing, registration or regulatory reference could be identified from the captured homepage. This is a verification gap, not proof of wrongdoing. The site sits on a shared platform subdomain, and no independent registration record ties it to a named company or individual, so ownership opacity applies. The operator's identity is unverified and no regulatory standing can be inferred. No third-party broker or regulator-style reputation entry exists for the site. The only external reputational evidence is the security-threat listing described above. The site's technical hygiene is basic and confirms nothing about the operator's legitimacy.
- Homepage: no named operating entity, licence number, registration number or physical address was identifiable in the captured content.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US), registry ARIN.
- Transport security: a TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV, domain validation only), valid to 2026-12-02. A DV certificate confirms control of the domain, not the identity of the operator.
What to Verify Next
Before any interaction, a prospective user should independently confirm who operates this application. That means finding the project's official site or announcements through a source unrelated to this address. If the project claims any financial or investment function, the claimed licensing should be confirmed with the relevant national financial-services registry. If this address was received through a message, advertisement or social post, the sender's authenticity should be checked on a separate channel. The site's official contact and support channels should be confirmed through that same independent route. Security teams should re-test the address after any claimed remediation, because the current listing may reflect a compromise or abuse of the shared subdomain.
- Hosting context: the site runs on a shared, free subdomain of a developer platform, so any party can publish content on it.
- Reputation: the engine detections are current, not historical, so any remediation would need to be re-scanned and confirmed.
- Homepage: no operator or registry reference is present to check against.
Summary Verdict
The site carries an elevated risk posture. Current, multi-source threat detections and a confirmed blacklist listing outweigh its stable runtime behavior and ordinary technical hygiene. Operator identity is unverified, and the evidence does not support treating the site as trustworthy.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site is delivered through a major, reputable CDN and WAF platform, and the observed addresses are all edge nodes, not an origin host. This is a mitigating factor only. It indicates mainstream, well-run delivery infrastructure, and the shared-platform abuse signals for these addresses are clean. It does not vouch for the content published behind it. Because only edge addresses are visible, the hosting origin cannot be independently verified. This also means content could be swapped quickly without any visible change in infrastructure.
Closing Assessment
Use of this site should be limited to passive viewing, if it is needed at all. No login, no credentials or personal data, no wallet connections and no payments or transfers should be submitted to it, and no files should be downloaded from it. Organisations should consider blocking the address at the web-gateway level until the threat listing is cleared and the operator is independently identified.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.
01 Governance
- A threat feed lists this domain as malicious, and that caps the score whatever the other checks found.Governance
rule:GOV_CRITICAL_BLACKLIST
02 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
03 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH - The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY
04 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete.Registration and ownership
rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE
Identity verification
| Status | UNKNOWN |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |
- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of app-aim-bot.pages.dev.
- The request stayed on app-aim-bot.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2024-09-23. Clear
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2fad |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-02 |
| Domain age | 1.93 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2024-09-23 |
| Archive snapshots | 15 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 15 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about app-aim-bot.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.