Is avaxbridge.pro a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

Security Alert

Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website presents itself as a cross-chain bridge for the AVAX token, with the homepage title promising to bridge AVAX from Base to "46+ networks". It appears to be a single-page crypto-asset transfer service, and its apparent purpose is to get visitors to move digital assets through the operator's bridging flow.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

This site carries confirmed, convergent contradictions, and the posture is cautionary. Multiple independent security vendors currently flag the domain as malicious, including several tier-one engines, and this is enough to place it on a confirmed blacklist. The detections are not attributed to a specific threat class, but a cluster of this size on a three-month-old domain is a decisive reputational signal. The sector context makes this more serious. Asset bridges ask visitors to authorise on-chain transfers and wallet interactions, and a flagged bridge front-end is the standard shape of a funds-diversion or wallet-drainer lure. The homepage claim of reach to "46+ networks" is an unverifiable breadth claim that makes a brand-new service look established. The behavioural sandbox did not observe wallet-connection attempts, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms or cloaking, so no active drainer was demonstrated during testing. The lack of such behaviour does not offset the external detections. The page also loads most of its network requests from third-party origins, and its console showed repeated script errors. Separately, abuse reports exist against the hosting IP. They concern a shared provider address, so they carry less weight as evidence about this operator. No conflicting legal entities were found, and no brand impersonation was confirmed. Evidence:

• The domain was registered on 2026-07-29 (about 0.24 years old, roughly three months), so the site has almost no operating history.
• The web archive holds 1 snapshot, from 2026, so only one year is tracked and there is no independent history to support the bridge's claims.
• The sandbox saw 17 malicious and 3 suspicious verdicts on the domain from external security engines, and three tier-one vendors were among the flaggers.
• The homepage markets bridging "from Base to 46+ networks", and no corroborating protocol or liquidity information was captured.
• The hosting IP has 6 abuse reports, with the most recent four days before the assessment. The IP is shared provider infrastructure, and the report categories include hacking and web-abuse types.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The captured pages give no clear disclosure of the operating entity, licensing status or registration details. This is a content gap on the site itself. For a service that moves customer assets across chains, no named operator, jurisdiction or compliance statement is presented. Ownership and governance opacity are present, but they are administrative limitations and not an identity contradiction. No third-party broker or regulatory-database match exists for this site, so there is no external signal of authorised status. The independent identity check was inconclusive, so the real-world operator is unconnected to any known brand or person. The HTTPS certificate is valid, but it is only domain-validated and shows control of the domain, not the identity of the business. Evidence:

• The domain is registered through the registrar Atak Domain Bilgi Teknolojileri A.Ş., with registration data showing no complete owner details; it expires 2027-07-29.
• The site is served from AS59692 (IQWeb FZ-LLC, United Arab Emirates).
• The TLS certificate was issued by YR1 at DV validation level and is valid to 2027-01-18, with 84 days remaining.
• The homepage, the only page captured, contains no visible legal-entity name, licence number or regulator reference.

What to Verify Next

The reputation findings must be resolved before any interaction beyond viewing. The first step is to look for the bridge in the official channels of the AVAX and Base ecosystems, and to compare the contract addresses and domain with those published there. Any claim of operator identity should be confirmed through an independent route, such as a regulator or business registry search for the stated operator. Official support and contact channels should be confirmed independently, not through links on this site. Anyone who has already interacted with the site should review their wallet's token approvals and revoke any that are unrecognised. Evidence:

• The homepage presents the bridge as live for "46+ networks" but names no operator or audit, so there is nothing on the page to check against a registry.
• Separate security-engine verdicts on the domain remain unresolved and should be re-checked for delisting before the domain is treated as clean.
• The one-snapshot archive history means there is no earlier version of the site to compare with.

Summary Verdict

The available evidence supports an elevated-risk classification. Confirmed external threat detections combine with a very young domain, minimal history and an unidentified operator. Valid transport encryption and stable page behaviour do not outweigh them. The site cannot be regarded as legitimate on the present record.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site resolves to a single address at a UAE-based hosting provider (IQWeb), and no CDN or WAF layer sits in front of it. There is therefore no protective infrastructure to mitigate the reputational findings. The hosting reads as ordinary commodity data-centre hosting and does not suggest abuse-ready or bulletproof tooling.

Closing Assessment

Treat the site as unsafe for login, wallet connection, credential entry or any financial transfer. Viewing it passively is the only reasonable use. Use only a bridge reached through the official ecosystem channels.

Signals weighed against the site

• AbuseIPDB: 6 reports on hosting IP 186.2.175.35 (IQWeb FZ-LLC, Data Center/Web Hosting/Transit), 11% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.