Is bitvavo.fun a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

Security Alert

Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

A Solana token community-voting page branded "Bitvavo Official Voting" presents a single-screen widget where a visitor pastes a token contract address, loads token details, and casts YES or NO votes after connecting a crypto wallet. The page shows a live vote feed with SOL amounts beside each vote, and it names no operator, revenue source, or terms. Its apparent purpose is to collect wallet-connected activity around Solana tokens, and its business model is undisclosed.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present and serious. The domain is blacklisted by multiple external reputation sources, with several independent detections of malicious content, and decisive weight attaches to that. The homepage also behaves differently after interaction than on first load, with both its text and its appearance changing materially. This is a recognised cloaking pattern, in which what an automated reviewer sees differs from what a person who engages sees. The page calls itself "Official" and uses a recognised exchange name, yet it supplies no operator, contact route, or link to any brand owner. This is a gap between claim and evidence rather than a confirmed impersonation. No conflicting legal entities were found, so there is no identity contradiction, but the absence of any named operator leaves the "Official" claim unsupported. The live feed shows a tally of 1012 votes at about 2.2 votes per second, with individual entries between roughly 3 and 73 SOL. These figures cannot be reconciled with the absence of any disclosed fee, deposit, or payout mechanism. They could be fabricated activity designed to create social proof, or they could be real value transfer, and the page gives no means of telling which. Wallet connection is requested "securely" to verify votes, which is the typical entry point for approval-based drain attacks. In the observed sessions no wallet-drainer or clipboard-hijack behaviour was recorded. Evidence:

• Homepage: after interaction, the page's content and layout changed substantially compared with its initial state, which the behavioural analysis rated as strong cloaking.
• Homepage: the title and heading "Bitvavo Official Voting" assert official status, while no operator, legal entity, or contact detail appears anywhere on the page.
• Homepage vote feed: a headline tally of 84% YES (846 YES, 166 NO) is shown beside SOL amounts per vote, such as 72.57 SOL, with no explanation of what those amounts are.
• Domain provenance: registered 2026-06-04 (~0.38 years old). Only 3 web-archive snapshots exist, spanning 2023-02-21 to 2023-02-23 (1 year tracked). They predate the current registration, so the present registration does not match the archived history.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The site publishes no legal, terms, privacy, or about pages, and its single page names no operating company, licence, registration number, or physical address. A token-voting service that moves value in SOL and invites wallet connection is a financial-adjacent activity, so these omissions carry more weight than they would on an informational site. In itself the gap does not prove wrongdoing, but here it sits alongside the external detections and cloaking behaviour already described. No third-party broker or regulator database has any record matching the name, so there is no reputational context from that channel in either direction. The page also does not say whether votes are free, fee-bearing, or tied to token purchases, so the user cannot assess their exposure. Evidence:

• Homepage: the only visible navigation entries are Vote, How It Works, Support, and Sign up or Sign in; none leads to legal terms, a privacy notice, or company details.
• Homepage: the page states a copyright year but no rights holder.
• Registration: registered through Dynadot Inc and set to expire 2027-06-04; no registrant identity is visible on the site.
• Hosting and encryption: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc.); the TLS certificate is a domain-validated one issued by WE1, valid to 2026-12-30. A domain-validated certificate confirms only control of the domain, not the operator's identity.

What to Verify Next

Before any wallet is connected or any funds are committed, the site's claimed connection to the named brand should be tested through that brand's own official channels, reached independently rather than through any link on this page. The user should also ask the operator, through a separately sourced route, for the legal entity behind the service, the fee and payout terms for votes, and any regulatory standing it claims. Official support and contact channels should be established the same way. Any token whose contract address is loaded here should be checked on its own block explorer, independently of the page's displayed details. Evidence:

• Homepage: the SOL amounts in the live feed have no stated purpose, which is why the fee and payout terms need written confirmation.
• Homepage: the "Support" and "Sign up or Sign in" entries give no destination that could be assessed in this analysis.
• Homepage: the token detail panel loads data from a pasted contract address, so those details are only as reliable as the address supplied.

Summary Verdict

The site carries a critical trust posture and is classed as a high-risk crypto token page. External reputation sources have flagged it, and its behaviour and content corroborate that flag. Neither technical hygiene nor the page's polished appearance offsets this. Legitimacy cannot be inferred from anything observed, and the real-world operator is unidentified.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site is fronted by Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and all four resolved addresses are Cloudflare edge servers, so the true hosting origin is not visible. The certificate is valid and issued by a known authority. This is a mitigating factor only, since protective infrastructure is available to any customer and does not indicate who operates the site or whether it is safe. The edge-only view also prevents independent hosting verification and can mask rapid swaps of content behind the edge. That is relevant given the cloaking behaviour already observed.

Closing Assessment

The site should be treated as read-only at most. Wallets should not be connected, no login or credentials should be entered, and no funds should be sent. Anyone who has already connected a wallet or signed anything here should revoke token approvals and consider moving assets to a fresh wallet. The page should also be reported to the brand it invokes and to the relevant platform abuse channels.