Is blockeds.com a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 5/100

blockeds.com
Download PDF Check another site How we score

Verdict

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

5 OUT OF 100
Critical Risk

blockeds.com shows high-risk / scam indicators.

Sensitive Interaction Risk Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-22 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

Evidence status and limitations

Evidence completeness: Not recorded

  • The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
  • Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

Malware engines6 flagged itVirusTotalRisk
Google Safe BrowsingListed as unsafeGoogleRisk
Abuse reports on the host0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reportsClear
Domain age1 months oldMost scam domains are under a year oldRisk
Web archiveArchived since 20214 snapshotsClear
CertificateEncrypted connectionIssued by YE1Noted

The page as captured

https://blockeds.com/
Screenshot of the blockeds.com homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment
What blockeds.com served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-22. The page may look different now.

Key findings

  • Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
  • Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
  • Public web-archive history exists since 2021.
  • At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

Full analysis

Security Alert

Google flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a bare, near-empty web property at the blockeds.com domain. Its homepage returned a not-found response carrying only a few characters of text. It shows a visitor no products, services, branding, or stated business purpose, so its apparent function can't be determined from what it serves.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present, and they are decisive. A major browser-safety service currently flags the domain for social engineering, which is the category used for phishing and deceptive-content threats. Several independent security engines also rate it malicious, and one rates it suspicious. The domain is therefore blacklisted by multiple third-party sources, and that listing overrides the otherwise ordinary technical hygiene. Neither impersonation of a specific brand nor conflicting legal identities was observed. The risk comes from the active threat listings, not from anything the homepage says. The threat listing is not tied to any distributed malware file, so it points to a deceptive-content or phishing role. Because the page is almost empty, a landing page or redirect could be swapped in without notice. The domain's history compounds the concern. Archive records show a few early captures from years ago, while the current registration is only weeks old. That pattern fits a lapsed domain that was re-registered, and the archive carries a phishing-known marker. On the plus side, automated browsing sessions saw no outbound data submissions, no wallet-connection prompts, no clipboard manipulation, no hidden forms, and no cloaking. This shows only that the empty page does nothing suspicious when loaded. It does not offset the external listings. Evidence:

  • Homepage: returned a not-found status with about 18 characters of text and no identifiable business content.
  • Reputation checks: the browser-safety service flagged the domain as social engineering, 6 security engines rated it malicious, and 1 rated it suspicious.
  • Domain history: registered 2026 (~34 days old). 4 archive snapshots span 2021–2026 (6 years tracked), with a long gap between them.
  • Behavioral sessions: 3 of 3 runs completed with zero external requests, no wallet or clipboard activity, and no cloaking.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The site claims no regulated activity, licensing, or registration, and no legal, terms, or about pages were captured. There is therefore nothing to check against a licensing registry. No third-party broker or regulatory-database record was matched, and the absence of a match is neutral. The site's real-world operator has not been independently linked to any brand or person, so no claim of legitimacy can be made. The registration was made through Namecheap, a mainstream registrar, but registrar choice carries no weight against the active threat listings. The TLS certificate is a basic domain-validated one, which proves only control of the domain, not the operator's identity. Evidence:

  • Homepage: no company name, licence, registration number, or legal pages were available to assess.
  • Registration: registered through Namecheap on 2026-09-17, expiring 2027-09-17.
  • Hosting and encryption: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare); TLS certificate issued by YE1 (DV), valid to 2026-12-16 (54 days remaining).

What to Verify Next

The domain should not be treated as a trusted destination while the external listings stand. Anyone who reached it through a link, message, or advertisement should trace where that link came from. They should then confirm the real destination through an independently sourced official channel, not through the site itself. If the domain is an organisation's own, the owner should check for compromise or a lapsed-and-reclaimed registration and request a review from the listing providers once the content is clean. Re-check the domain's status in the major threat feeds before any future engagement. Evidence:

  • Reputation checks: the active browser-safety and multi-engine listings are the primary gating condition.
  • Domain history: a recent registration following sparse older archive captures is the provenance question to resolve.
  • Homepage: the empty page gives no on-site contact or identity route, so any official contact must come from an outside source.

Summary Verdict

The overall posture is high risk. Active, corroborated threat listings from independent sources outweigh the benign technical features, and the domain's recent re-registration and empty content give no basis to offset them. The assessment is cautionary, with the domain treated as unsafe for any sensitive interaction.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and all observed addresses are edge servers, so the true origin could not be seen. The certificate is valid and issued by a recognised issuer. This is a mitigating factor only. Edge-only visibility means hosting cannot be independently confirmed and content could be swapped rapidly. A young domain with sparse subdomains is an unconfirmed heuristic and does not change the verdict.

Closing Assessment

Do not log in, enter credentials, or make any payment or financial interaction with this domain. Any contact should be limited to passive viewing from a protected environment, and no files should be downloaded from it.

Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.

What the analysis found

4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, hosting and network, registration and ownership.

01 Governance

  • A threat feed lists this domain as malicious, and that caps the score whatever the other checks found.Governance rule:GOV_CRITICAL_BLACKLIST

02 External reputation

  • An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL

03 Hosting and network

  • The domain is young and has almost nothing else set up around it.Hosting and network rule:DNS_SPARSE_YOUNG_DOMAIN

04 Registration and ownership

  • The registration record withholds contact details for the operator.Registration and ownership rule:KF_WHOIS_HIDDEN
  • Registration details are held behind a privacy service, so no operator is named publicly. This is common and legal, and it also means there is nobody to check.Registration and ownership rule:KF_WHOIS_PRIVATE

Identity verification

StatusUNKNOWN
Identity score50/100
Identity verification confidence15%
  • AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.

What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of blockeds.com.

  • The request stayed on blockeds.com. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
  • Registration is published under NAMECHEAP INC. Clear
  • DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. Noted
  • The registration is paid up to 2027-09-17. Noted
  • The earliest public archive of this site is from 2021-11-27. Clear
  • It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. Noted

Domain intelligence

RegistrarNAMECHEAP INC
HostingCLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US
CountryUS
Server IP2606:4700:3037::ac43:9e22
Name serversCHELSEA.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM, GLEN.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM
CDN / edge networkDetected (cloudflare)
Resolved IP addresses6
Edge IP addresses6
Likely origin IP addresses0
SSL issuerYE1
SSL expiry2026-12-16
Domain age0.09 years (continuous registration)
Domain expiry2027-09-17
Archive first seen2021-11-27
Archive snapshots4
ReputationVirusTotal: 6 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 1 match

About this assessment

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about blockeds.com at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

Already paid or signed in? Do this now

Act fast. The sooner your bank knows, the better the chance of stopping the payment.

  1. Call your bank or card company now. Use the number on the back of your card. Ask them to stop or reverse the payment.
  2. Paid with crypto? Contact the exchange or wallet app you sent it from today. Give them the address you paid.
  3. Signed in or shared a password? Change it now, on every site where you use it, and turn on two-step sign-in.
  4. Report it to the police. In the US you can also report at reportfraud.ftc.gov and ic3.gov. In other countries, use your national police or fraud reporting service.
  5. Keep the evidence. Save screenshots, receipts, emails and chat messages. Your bank and the police will ask for them.
  6. Ignore anyone who offers to get your money back for a fee. These "recovery" offers are often a second scam.

Looking for the real site? Type the company name into a search engine yourself, or use the web address printed on your card, bill or letter. Do not use links from messages or ads.

Common questions about blockeds.com

Is blockeds.com a scam?

TrustSniffer's assessment of blockeds.com found strong scam indicators. It scored 5 out of 100 on 2026-10-22, which is the critical-risk band. The specific signals are listed in the evidence above.

Is blockeds.com safe to use?

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

What is the trust score of blockeds.com?

blockeds.com scored 5 out of 100 on 2026-10-22, which places it in the critical-risk band. The score is built from the domain's age and registration history, its hosting and certificate, the content of the site itself, and third-party reputation data. There is no human rating and no user review in it.

Download this report as PDF Free, no account needed. Create one to keep a history of the sites you check.
By AminRez, Founder & Lead Security Researcher, TrustSniffer
Produced by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine · assessed 2026-10-22 · how we assess · report a mistake