Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
bulls-ansem.xyz shows high-risk / scam indicators.
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 13 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | 4 months oldMost scam domains are under a year old | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 20261 snapshot | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by WE1 | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
Bulls-ansem.xyz is a recently registered website on the low-cost ".xyz" extension. During analysis it did not deliver ordinary site content. A security interstitial titled as a suspected phishing page was served in its place, so the site's products, operator and business model could not be observed. The domain's only identifiable purpose is as an unverified web destination that automated security systems currently treat as malicious.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
Contradictory signals are present and severe. The domain is blacklisted by multiple independent reputation sources. A large cluster of security engines classify it as malicious, with additional engines marking it suspicious, and several tier-one security vendors are among the detections. The site's own homepage did not render. Access was refused with a forbidden response and a suspected-phishing warning was shown in its place. This is consistent with the external detections and indicates the domain has already been identified as a phishing candidate. No brand impersonation or conflicting legal identities were observed, but only because no substantive page content could be captured. The absence of those findings should not be read as clearance. Browser-behavior testing found no wallet-connection prompts, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms or external password forms. The overwhelming majority of the site's traffic went to external hosts, and the page generated a high volume of script errors. That pattern fits a thin page that loads most of its behavior from elsewhere. The domain's age compounds the concern: it was registered only months ago, which is the typical window for disposable phishing and fraud infrastructure. Evidence:
- Homepage: access was blocked and replaced by a suspected-phishing interstitial, with a forbidden (403) response status.
- Reputation: 13 security engines flagged the domain malicious and 3 suspicious, including three tier-one vendors.
- Domain provenance: registered 2026-07-07 (~0.31 years old); a single archive snapshot dated 2026-07-09, with no prior history.
- Browser behavior: 33 external XHR/fetch calls and 9 external POST requests, with up to 95.7% of activity directed to external hosts and 34 console errors across 3 runs.
Regulatory Verification Notes
No licensing, registration or legal-entity information could be assessed. The only page retrievable was a security warning, not a terms, about or contact page. No regulator or third-party broker database matched the site, so there is no independent evidence of authorization to offer financial or investment services. This is a verification gap, not a finding of wrongdoing in itself. The operator's identity remains unknown, and registration details do not identify the real-world owner, which leaves the ownership opacity unresolved. The domain was registered through NICENIC International Group, and the TLS certificate is a domain-validated one, which confirms only control of the domain, not the identity or legitimacy of an organization. Neither establishes the operator's trustworthiness. Evidence:
- Legal/identity pages: none retrievable; the captured page text was limited to the interstitial warning.
- Registrar: NICENIC International Group Co., Limited; registration runs to 2027-07-07.
- TLS: certificate issued by WE1 (DV), valid to 2026-12-22 with 54 days remaining.
- Third-party broker database: no match for this domain.
What to Verify Next
Any contact with this domain should be preceded by independent confirmation that it belongs to a real, identifiable organization. If the site is presented as an affiliate of a known project, brand or individual, that party's official, independently sourced channels should be asked whether the domain is theirs. Any claimed licence or registration should be checked directly in the relevant regulator's public register, not through links supplied by the site. Security teams should check whether the domain has appeared in inbound messages, advertisements or social posts, and treat those as potential phishing lures. If the domain is believed to be mistakenly flagged, the site's owner should be asked to request a reputation review and publish verifiable corporate and contact details, and the reputation checks should be repeated afterwards. Official support and contact channels should be confirmed through an independent, offline route before any engagement. Evidence:
- Homepage: no operator, company or product information could be read to check against a registry.
- Reputation: detections are current, so a later re-check would show whether they have been cleared.
- Domain age: registration is under a year old, so no long-term record exists to corroborate identity.
Summary Verdict
The available evidence supports a high-risk posture. Current, multi-source malicious detections and a suspected-phishing interstitial outweigh the few neutral technical signals, such as a valid certificate and a stable hosting footprint. The site's identity and purpose are unverified, and nothing observed offsets the threat intelligence.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site is served through Cloudflare's CDN/WAF (AS13335, Cloudflare, Inc., US). All four observed addresses are Cloudflare edge servers, and the origin server was not observable. This mitigates direct exposure but also prevents independent verification of where the content is actually hosted. A reputable network is a neutral factor only. Cloudflare's network is heavily used by both legitimate and abusive sites, and the protections do not offset the reputation risk.
Closing Assessment
The domain should not be visited from sensitive environments, and no credentials, wallet connections, payments or personal data should be submitted to it. Any link to it from emails, messages or advertisements should be treated as hostile. Security teams should consider blocking it and reporting any lure that points to it.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-29 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network, registration and ownership.
01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH - The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH
03 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered between three and six months ago.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_YOUNG_6M
04 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete.Registration and ownership
rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE
Identity verification
| Status | UNKNOWN |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |
- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of bulls-ansem.xyz.
- The request stayed on bulls-ansem.xyz. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- Registration is published under NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED. Clear
- DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. Noted
- The registration is paid up to 2027-07-07. Noted
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-07-09. Clear
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED |
|---|---|
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:3034::6815:3c62 |
| Name servers | JAXSON.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM, RITA.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-22 |
| Domain age | 0.31 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-07-07 |
| Archive first seen | 2026-07-09 |
| Archive snapshots | 1 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 13 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about bulls-ansem.xyz at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.