Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
cashcattoken.co shows high-risk / scam indicators.
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 15 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | 3 months oldMost scam domains are under a year old | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 20261 snapshot | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by WE1 | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
The website at cashcattoken.co presents itself as a promotional page for a meme-style crypto token, "$CASHCAT", under the tagline "They Called It Cash Cat First". It is a single-page, token-branded landing site whose apparent purpose is to attract visitors to a speculative digital-asset project. The captured content was not independently analysed for specific products, yield claims or contact details, so the description rests on the page title, the domain name and observed page behaviour.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
This is the decisive section. The domain is currently listed as malicious by a substantial number of independent security vendors, including several of the most widely used enterprise-grade engines. This amounts to a confirmed blacklisting and is the main reason for the elevated-risk assessment. The listing is corroborated by a second external reputation source. Browser-reputation services have not flagged the site, but that does not offset the vendor consensus. No brand impersonation or conflicting legal identities were observed, so the risk rests on the blacklisting and not on identity contradictions. The domain is also very recent. A token-promotion site that is both newly created and widely flagged fits the usual pattern of short-lived campaigns targeting speculative buyers. In the sandbox, the site sent a notable share of its page traffic to third-party destinations, including data submissions to destinations outside the expected set of trusted services. No wallet-drainer routines, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms or content cloaking were triggered during testing, so there is no confirmed theft mechanism. The blacklisting still outweighs this absence of observed exploits, since these tests exercise only a small fraction of the behaviours a hostile page could show. Evidence:
- Homepage: the page title promotes a "$CASHCAT" token with a "They Called It Cash Cat First" tagline, consistent with a speculative meme-token launch.
- Homepage behaviour testing: roughly half of the outbound data submissions went to non-whitelisted third-party destinations, and the page produced repeated console errors across three test runs.
- Domain registration: registered 2026-08-12 (about 0.21 years, roughly 2.5 months old) through Dynadot Inc.
- Web archive: a single snapshot, captured 2026-09-10, spanning 1 year tracked, so there is no meaningful history.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The captured pages show no licence, corporate registration or named legal entity, and the supplied evidence contains no indication of regulatory oversight for a token offering. Ownership is opaque, and registration details do not identify an accountable operator. This is a disclosure and transparency matter, separate from the blacklisting, but it removes any accountable counterparty if funds are lost. No third-party broker or regulatory-database entry matched the domain, so there is no independent reputational context pointing in either direction. The site uses a basic domain-validated certificate, which proves only that the connection is encrypted and that the certificate requester controlled the domain, not who operates the site. Evidence:
- Legal and identity content: no operator name, registered address or licence reference was identified.
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV), valid to 2027-01-08, with about 73 days remaining.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- Third-party registry check: no matching broker or regulator record was found.
What to Verify Next
Do not treat any claim on the site about audits, partnerships, listings or returns as verified. Any such claim should be checked independently on the claimed partner's, auditor's or exchange's own official channels, reached without using links from this site. Anyone assessing the token should confirm through independent public sources that it exists, who issued it and whether it is genuinely traded. The official social and support channels should be confirmed through an offline or independently sourced route. Any wallet connection, signature request or deposit prompt on the site should be treated as unverified until the blacklisting has been resolved. Evidence:
- Homepage: the token branding and tagline are the only identity cues observed, and nothing links them to a verifiable issuer.
- Domain registration: the domain is only a few months old, so there is no long-standing record to check against.
- Third-party reputation: the active vendor detections remain unresolved and should be re-checked before any reassessment.
Summary Verdict
The overall posture is high-risk and clearly cautionary. Widespread external malicious detections, a very young domain and an unverifiable operator converge on an assessment that the site is unsafe for sensitive interaction. The protective technical measures in place are not enough to offset the reputational findings.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and web application firewall. Every observed address is a CDN edge node, and the origin server is not visible, so the actual hosting cannot be independently verified. This reduces direct exposure to attack but also means content can be changed quickly without the hosting changing. It is a mitigating factor only and does not offset the reputational findings. The domain's sparse subdomain footprint is a weak, unconfirmed signal consistent with its youth.
Closing Assessment
The site should be limited to read-only viewing, if it is visited at all. No credentials should be entered, no wallet connected, and no transaction signed or payment made. Anyone who has already interacted with it should treat any connected wallet or entered credentials as potentially exposed and take protective steps.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-26 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, behaviour in a sandbox.
01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
02 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D - The domain is young and has almost nothing else set up around it.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_SPARSE_YOUNG_DOMAIN
03 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new.History in the web archive
rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE
04 Behaviour in a sandbox
- A large share of what the page loaded came from other domains.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_MODERATE - The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS
Identity verification
| Status | UNKNOWN |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |
- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of cashcattoken.co.
- The request stayed on cashcattoken.co. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- Registration is published under Dynadot Inc. Clear
- DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. Noted
- The registration is paid up to 2027-08-12. Noted
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-10. Clear
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Dynadot Inc |
|---|---|
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:3035::6815:466f |
| Name servers | MAGNOLIA.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM, QUINTON.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-01-08 |
| Domain age | 0.21 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-08-12 |
| Archive first seen | 2026-09-10 |
| Archive snapshots | 1 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 15 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about cashcattoken.co at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.