Is cousinprotect.xyz a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

Security Alert

Fortinet flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

Cousin's Protection (marketed as an "Anti Rug Agent") is a single-page product site for a crypto trading protection tool sold on a freemium model, with a free tier and a Pro tier at $9 per month (a yearly option is discounted by 36%). The homepage promises rug-pull detection across 13 blockchains, monitoring of developer wallets and contract upgrades, and an "Auto-Sell Protection" feature. It says this feature exits positions through a private relay in the same block, with an average execution time of 0.3 seconds. Activation requires the user to drag a bookmark into the browser and run it on a third-party trading site, fomo.family, and the site says no account is needed.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

A confirmed external blacklist hit and the page's internal contradictions place this site in a clearly high-risk category. A tier-one security vendor currently flags the domain, and further engines return suspicious verdicts. No brand impersonation or conflicting legal identities were observed, and no phishing was confirmed. The threat comes from the combination of the external detections and the way the product works. The homepage describes the tool as "read-only" with no signing, yet it also advertises automatic sell execution through a private relay, which cannot happen without the ability to act on a user's trades. It also claims that no server holds positions, while describing server-side position tracking and stored alert history. A bookmarklet runs script code inside the third-party trading page. In that position it can read page content and session context and trigger actions in the user's name. The site offers no code audit, named team or independent attestation to support its claims. The statistics are also unverifiable: "250k known rug addresses", "50k plus exchange deposit addresses watched in real time", and flagging of repeat scammers "within 2 minutes of launch". The "Trade with a shield" framing and the urgency language ("Built for FOMO") target traders who may act quickly, and the domain's age fits a short-lived or opportunistic operation. No wallet-connection prompts, clipboard tampering, hidden forms or external credential forms were observed during behavioural testing. That reduces the likelihood of an overt drainer on the page itself, but it does not offset the confirmed blacklist and the contradictory control claims. Evidence:

• Domain registered on 2026-09-23 (~25 days old), which is very recent for a service claiming wide on-chain coverage.
• Homepage: states a read-only, non-custodial design, while the same page advertises same-block auto-sell exits and server-side position tracking.
• How-it-works section: tells users to drag a bookmark into the browser and activate it on fomo.family, with enabling "about 15 seconds" and "No account".
• Behavioural testing across three runs found no wallet-connect prompts, clipboard writes or hidden forms.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The site shows no licence, registration number, legal entity, postal address, named team or published audit. Its only identity artefact is a copyright line, so the operator cannot be tied to any accountable legal person. For a product that claims to control trade exits on users' behalf, this gap is significant. The site makes no regulatory claims at all, so there is nothing on the page that could be checked against a registry. No third-party broker or regulatory listing was matched, and no endorsement of any kind is present. Evidence:

• Homepage and footer: the company identity is limited to a copyright line, with no registration, address or licensing information.
• Pricing section: describes paid subscriptions and exit-control features but names no responsible entity or terms of service.
• Hosted on AS13335 (Cloudflare); the TLS certificate is domain-validated (DV), issued by YE1 and valid to 2026-12-22, which confirms encryption only and says nothing about the operator.
• The domain is registered through NICENIC International Group Co., Limited.

What to Verify Next

No interaction should proceed until the claims are independently substantiated. First, a request should go to the operator for a named legal entity, jurisdiction and registered address, which should be checked against the relevant corporate registry. Next, any independent security audit of the bookmarklet code should be located, and the script's actual behaviour reviewed by a qualified party in an isolated browser profile with no wallets or sessions loaded. Third, the claimed 13-chain coverage and the rug-address database should be tested against known historical rug events. The official support and contact channels should also be confirmed through an independent route before any reliance on them. Evidence:

• Homepage: the detection database size, chain count and 0.3-second execution time are unsupported by any published methodology.
• Security section: asserts read-only operation but offers no audit report or source repository.
• Pricing page: the Pro tier is built around controlling trade exits, which raises the potential impact of any hidden capability.

Summary Verdict

The assessment is critical and cautionary. Third-party detections, internally contradictory security claims, an unattributable operator and a brand-new domain converge on a high-risk posture, and the technical hygiene of the site does not change that conclusion.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and all four observed addresses are edge servers, so the origin host cannot be observed or independently attributed. Bot-protection challenges were present during testing. Protective infrastructure is a mitigating factor only and cannot offset the external detections. It also limits independent verification of where the content is actually served from.

Closing Assessment

The bookmarklet should not be installed or run on any trading site, and no wallet, login, credential or payment interaction should take place. At most, the site may be viewed passively until a verifiable operator and an independent code audit are available.