Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
dazzling-valkyrie-11a286.netlify.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 12 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | 3 months oldMost scam domains are under a year old | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 20261 snapshot | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
This website is a minimal, single-page site titled "BNB DAINER" on a free, platform-issued Netlify subdomain rather than a branded domain. Its captured homepage holds only a few hundred characters of text. That text is too thin to show a clear product, service or business model. The title evokes BNB cryptocurrency branding, so a crypto-related purpose is implied but not demonstrated.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
The site has serious reputation contradictions, and it is blacklisted by multiple independent security sources. A substantial cluster of security engines classify it as malicious, with a few more rating it suspicious. The detections include several of the most widely deployed enterprise security vendors, which is why the assessment is treated as decisive. No brand impersonation or conflicting legal identities were observed, but those findings do not offset the blacklisting. The site's live behaviour was benign in testing. It made no external data requests, showed no wallet-connection or wallet-draining activity, no clipboard manipulation, no hidden or externally posting credential forms, and no cloaking. That fits a near-empty page, but it does not clear the site. Malicious classification of a freshly created page can reflect content, redirects or payloads that a sandbox did not trigger, and it can also reflect later changes. Two abuse reports exist against a network address used by the site. They relate to the shared cloud provider's address pool, not to this site specifically, so they are discounted and add no independent weight. Given the crypto-flavoured branding, the site could be used for token, wallet or investment lures, but the evidence does not show any such mechanic. Evidence:
- Homepage: 12 security engines flagged the site as malicious and 2 as suspicious; the external blacklist signal is confirmed and a critical-threat override is active.
- Homepage behavioural testing (3 of 3 runs successful): 0 external requests, 0 wallet-connect runs, no clipboard or form anomalies, no cloaking.
- Hosting infrastructure: 2 abuse reports on a shared provider address (confidence 0), attributed to shared infrastructure and discounted.
- Domain provenance: approximately 91 days old (~0.25 years); the web archive holds 1 snapshot, first and last seen 2026-07-27, so there is effectively no historical record.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The captured homepage names no operating company, no registration or licence number and no jurisdiction, and the site has no discernible legal or contact structure. This leaves the real-world operator unidentified, and nothing on the site ties it to an independent brand or person. For a site that appears to use cryptocurrency branding, this is a disclosure gap, not evidence of wrongdoing on its own. Its weight here comes from the blacklisting already described. No third-party broker or regulator-style entry matched the site, so no external reputational context exists on this axis. The valid TLS certificate is an organisation-validated certificate issued to the hosting platform, not to the site's operator. It shows that the transport channel is encrypted, not who runs the site. Evidence:
- Homepage: no operator name, licence, registration number or jurisdiction is disclosed in the captured content.
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 (OV), subject organisation Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US).
- Third-party broker dataset: no match for this site.
What to Verify Next
Before any interaction, confirm independently whether the site has any legitimate affiliation with a known BNB-related project. Do this by finding that project's official channels through a trusted, independent route, not through links on this site. Check any claimed operator, licence or registration with the relevant registry, but only if the site later publishes one. Re-test the blacklisting status after a clean-up claim, because detections can be cleared or added as the site changes. Confirm the official support and contact channels offline before sharing any data. Evidence:
- Homepage: no identifiable project, team or contact route is presented to cross-check.
- Blacklist status: 12 malicious and 2 suspicious detections stand at the time of analysis.
- Domain provenance: the very short history leaves no earlier record of the operator to rely on.
Summary Verdict
The site carries an elevated risk posture. Confirmed security blacklisting is the decisive factor, and no legitimacy evidence on the site or in its technical configuration offsets it. The operator's identity is not established, and the page offers no content that would support a favourable reading.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site sits behind AWS-based edge infrastructure operated through the Netlify platform. All four observed addresses are edge nodes, and the origin server was not observable, so independent verification of the underlying host is not possible from outside. This protection mitigates exposure to infrastructure-level attacks, but it does not vouch for the content or its operator. Edge-only visibility also means page content can be swapped quickly without any visible change in hosting.
Closing Assessment
The site should not be used for login, credential entry, wallet connection or any financial interaction. Viewing it, if necessary, should be limited to read-only use in an isolated or disposable environment, with no downloads. Any real engagement should wait until the blacklisting is cleared and the operator is independently identified.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, history in the web archive, hosting and network, registration and ownership.
01 Governance
- A threat feed lists this domain as malicious, and that caps the score whatever the other checks found.Governance
rule:GOV_CRITICAL_BLACKLIST
02 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
03 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new.History in the web archive
rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE
04 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered between three and six months ago.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_YOUNG_6M
05 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete.Registration and ownership
rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE
Signals weighed against the site
- AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.
Identity verification
| Status | UNKNOWN |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |
- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of dazzling-valkyrie-11a286.netlify.app.
- The request stayed on dazzling-valkyrie-11a286.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-07-27. Clear
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | 0.25 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2026-07-27 |
| Archive snapshots | 1 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 12 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about dazzling-valkyrie-11a286.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.