Is dcord-collab.land a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

dcord-collab.land
Download PDF Check another site How we score

Verdict

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

0 OUT OF 100
Critical Risk

dcord-collab.land shows high-risk / scam indicators.

Sensitive Interaction Risk Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-25 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

Evidence status and limitations

Evidence completeness: Not recorded

  • The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
  • Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

Malware engines3 flagged itVirusTotalRisk
Google Safe BrowsingNot listedGoogleClear
Abuse reports on the host0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reportsClear
Domain age2 months oldMost scam domains are under a year oldRisk
Web archiveArchived since 20261 snapshotClear
CertificateEncrypted connectionIssued by WE1Noted

The page as captured

https://collab.land/
Screenshot of the dcord-collab.land homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment
What dcord-collab.land served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-25. The page may look different now.

Key findings

  • Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
  • Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
  • Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
  • At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

Full analysis

Security Alert

Fortinet flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

dcord-collab.land is a recently created website. Its single captured homepage carries the title "Collab.Land", but it runs on a different, hyphenated domain. The name suggests a community or collaboration-oriented online service. The evidence shows no confirmed operator, and the business model could not be established from the evidence.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

The assessment is clearly cautionary. The domain is currently blacklisted by threat-intelligence sources, and several independent security engines classify it as malicious or suspicious. No page-level phishing, brand-impersonation or conflicting-legal-identity finding was recorded, so the concern rests on the blacklisting and the reputation signals around it. The homepage title reuses a recognisable service name on a lookalike, hyphenated domain registered only weeks earlier. That pattern is common in brand-imitation setups, but the evidence does not confirm impersonation. Behavioural testing found no wallet-connection prompts, clipboard tampering, hidden forms, password forms posting to third parties or content cloaking. However, the homepage issued a high volume of requests to outside services, including several form-style submissions, and some of those destinations are not recognised as standard. It also contained a suspicious inline script. These patterns fit data being forwarded to third parties or an undisclosed script payload. The site should be treated as unsafe for any sensitive interaction. Evidence:

  • Homepage: external threat-intelligence sources currently list the domain as malicious, and multiple engines independently flag it.
  • Homepage behaviour: 15 external data requests and 5 external submissions during testing, with 8 requests going to non-whitelisted destinations.
  • Homepage code: one suspicious inline script was detected.
  • Domain provenance: registered 2026-08-27 (~0.16 years old) through NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED, expiring 2027-08-27. The web archive holds 1 snapshot, dated 2026-09-03, so there is effectively no prior history.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The homepage does not clearly present a legal entity, registration number or licence, and the real-world operator is not independently verified. Ownership is opaque. Because the domain is blacklisted, this gap carries more weight than it would on an otherwise clean site. No third-party broker or regulator record was matched, which means nothing positive corroborates the site's identity. The transport layer is the one conventional positive signal, and it does not establish legitimacy. The certificate is domain-validated only, so it confirms an encrypted connection and says nothing about who operates the site. Evidence:

  • Homepage: no verifiable company name, licence or registration disclosure was identified.
  • Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV), valid to 2027-01-23.
  • Hosting network: AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
  • Broker reputation: no matching entry in third-party broker datasets.

What to Verify Next

Before any interaction, the site's connection to the Collab.Land name should be checked against the official channels of the organisation that owns that name. Those channels should be reached by an independently sourced route, not through links on this domain. Anyone who already visited or connected an account here should review recent authorisations and account activity and rotate any credentials entered. Any official-looking announcement or invitation pointing to this domain should be confirmed through the organisation's established support channels. Evidence:

  • Homepage: the title reuses the Collab.Land name on a separate, newly registered domain.
  • Domain provenance: the domain is only weeks old and has no meaningful historical footprint.
  • Homepage behaviour: outbound submissions to external destinations were observed during testing.

Summary Verdict

The available evidence converges on an elevated-risk posture. The site is blacklisted, very new, and has no verifiable operator. It also behaves unusually for a single landing page. Technical hygiene such as valid encryption does not offset the reputational findings. The site cannot be considered legitimate on present evidence.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site is served through Cloudflare's CDN and web application firewall. All observed addresses belong to edge servers, so the origin host cannot be seen or independently assessed. This is a mitigating factor only. It shows the site uses mainstream protective infrastructure, but it does not offset the external threat detections. Edge-only visibility also means content could be changed quickly without any visible hosting change.

Closing Assessment

The site should not be used for logins, wallet or credential entry, or payments. Any visit should be limited to passive viewing, and nothing should be downloaded from it. The safest course is to reach the intended service only through independently confirmed official channels.

Written analysis generated 2026-10-25 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.

What the analysis found

5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, behaviour in a sandbox, history in the web archive, registration and ownership.

01 External reputation

  • An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL

02 Hosting and network

  • The domain was registered less than three months ago.Hosting and network rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D

03 Behaviour in a sandbox

  • The page carried inline scripts written in a style TrustSniffer treats as suspicious.Behaviour in a sandbox rule:BEHAV_SUSPICIOUS_INLINE_SCRIPTS
  • Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one.Behaviour in a sandbox rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH

04 History in the web archive

  • The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new.History in the web archive rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE

05 Registration and ownership

  • The public registration record for this domain is incomplete.Registration and ownership rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE

Identity verification

StatusUNKNOWN
Identity score50/100
Identity verification confidence30%
  • AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.

What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of dcord-collab.land.

  • The request for dcord-collab.land ended on collab.land, a different domain. Watch
  • Registration is published under NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED. Clear
  • DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. Noted
  • The registration is paid up to 2027-08-27. Noted
  • The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-03. Clear
  • It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. Noted

Domain intelligence

RegistrarNICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED
HostingCLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US
CountryUS
Server IP2606:4700:3035::ac43:b5e8
Name serversmemphis.ns.cloudflare.com, serenity.ns.cloudflare.com
CDN / edge networkDetected (cloudflare)
Resolved IP addresses4
Edge IP addresses4
Likely origin IP addresses0
SSL issuerWE1
SSL expiry2027-01-23
Domain age0.16 years (continuous registration)
Domain expiry2027-08-27
Archive first seen2026-09-03
Archive snapshots1
ReputationVirusTotal: 3 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches

About this assessment

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about dcord-collab.land at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

Already paid or signed in? Do this now

Act fast. The sooner your bank knows, the better the chance of stopping the payment.

  1. Call your bank or card company now. Use the number on the back of your card. Ask them to stop or reverse the payment.
  2. Paid with crypto? Contact the exchange or wallet app you sent it from today. Give them the address you paid.
  3. Signed in or shared a password? Change it now, on every site where you use it, and turn on two-step sign-in.
  4. Report it to the police. In the US you can also report at reportfraud.ftc.gov and ic3.gov. In other countries, use your national police or fraud reporting service.
  5. Keep the evidence. Save screenshots, receipts, emails and chat messages. Your bank and the police will ask for them.
  6. Ignore anyone who offers to get your money back for a fee. These "recovery" offers are often a second scam.

Looking for the real site? Type the company name into a search engine yourself, or use the web address printed on your card, bill or letter. Do not use links from messages or ads.

Common questions about dcord-collab.land

Is dcord-collab.land a scam?

TrustSniffer's assessment of dcord-collab.land found strong scam indicators. It scored 0 out of 100 on 2026-10-25, which is the critical-risk band. The specific signals are listed in the evidence above.

Is dcord-collab.land safe to use?

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

What is the trust score of dcord-collab.land?

dcord-collab.land scored 0 out of 100 on 2026-10-25, which places it in the critical-risk band. The score is built from the domain's age and registration history, its hosting and certificate, the content of the site itself, and third-party reputation data. There is no human rating and no user review in it.

Download this report as PDF Free, no account needed. Create one to keep a history of the sites you check.
By AminRez, Founder & Lead Security Researcher, TrustSniffer
Produced by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine · assessed 2026-10-25 · how we assess · report a mistake