Is domesticviolence.ru a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

domesticviolence.ru
Download PDF Check another site How we score

Verdict

0 OUT OF 100
Critical Risk

domesticviolence.ru shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Sensitive Interaction Risk Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-08-21 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

What this site appears to beRussian-language promotional landing page for 'Pinco' online casino advertising large welcome bonuses, multiple deposit methods including crypto, Curacao license claim, APK download and mirror sites to bypass blocks. Primary goal: drive account registrations and deposits.

Evidence status and limitations

Evidence completeness: UNKNOWN

  • The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
  • Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

Malware engines7 flagged itVirusTotalRisk
Google Safe BrowsingNot listedGoogleClear
Abuse reports on the host0 reportsAbuseIPDB; shared hosting inflates this countNoted
Domain age1.4 years oldRegistered historyClear
Web archiveArchived since 2017326 snapshotsClear
CertificateEncrypted connectionIssued by WE1Noted

The page as captured

https://domesticviolence.ru/
Screenshot of the domesticviolence.ru homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment
What domesticviolence.ru served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-08-21. The page may look different now.

Key findings

  • Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
  • Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity).
  • Public web-archive history exists since 2017.
  • At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

Full analysis

Security Alert

Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

The website is a Russian-language promotional landing page for “Pinco” online casino, presenting casino games, live dealers, crash games, lotteries, bingo, sports betting, registration and login prompts, promotional bonuses, payment options, mirror sites, and a downloadable mobile APK. Its apparent business model is to drive account registrations and player deposits for gambling and sports betting.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

The site presents a materially elevated scam and sensitive-interaction risk. Confirmed external malicious detections and blacklist status are decisive contradictions, even though no separate brand-impersonation finding, phishing form, or conflicting legal-entity identity was observed. The homepage combines deposit-before-service mechanics with aggressive incentives, including a welcome offer of up to 450,000 rubles plus 250 free spins and 55% cashback on accumulators. It also promotes mirror sites to bypass blocks and an APK download, while accepting or promoting cryptocurrency payments involving Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tether, TRON, Dogecoin, and Litecoin; these features increase exposure to irreversible financial loss, untrusted software, and opaque payment flows. The observed content therefore does not support account registration, credential submission, deposits, or other financial interaction.

Evidence
  • Homepage: Russian-language Pinco casino landing page with registration, login, casino, live, crash-game, lottery, bingo, and sports-betting calls to action.
  • Homepage: Advertises a welcome bonus of up to 450,000 ₽ plus 250 free spins and 55% cashback on accumulator bets, alongside prominent deposit and play prompts.
  • Homepage behavior: Promotes downloadable APK software and mirror sites intended to bypass blocks; cryptocurrency payment references include Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tether, TRON, Dogecoin, and Litecoin.
  • External reputation telemetry: 7 malicious detections were recorded among 12 effective evaluated detections, and the domain is confirmed blacklisted; Kaspersky was the named tier-one flagged vendor.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The homepage claims that Pinco operates under a Curacao license, but the observed content does not provide a license number, verifiable operating entity, or sufficiently transparent legal and contact disclosure to substantiate that claim. The operator’s real-world identity remains unverified. A separate broker-reputation dataset produced no match, which is neutral contextual information rather than evidence of authorization or legitimacy.

Evidence
  • Registration telemetry: Domain created 2025-04-05T05:39:47Z, registered through ACTIVE-RU, with a recorded age of 1.38 years and expiration on 2027-04-05T05:39:47Z.
  • Archive telemetry: 326 snapshots spanning 2017-11-02T19:17:50Z through 2026-05-20T09:24:25Z, covering 10 years of tracked activity; the historical record shows continuity without a flagged suspicious repurpose.
  • Hosting telemetry: Served from AS13335, CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US.
  • Transport telemetry: TLS certificate issued by WE1 at DV validation level, valid through 2026-09-26T07:59:36+00:00.

What to Verify Next

Before any regulated or financial engagement, an independent check should confirm that the claimed Curacao authorization applies to the exact domain and names a legally identifiable operator. The operator’s corporate registration, terms, dispute process, withdrawal conditions, and responsible-gambling framework should be obtained from authoritative sources rather than relying on the landing page. Contact channels should be confirmed through an independent offline or previously trusted route, and any proposed APK should be excluded unless its provenance and integrity can be established through a trusted distribution channel. Pending those checks, the appropriate operational posture is to avoid login, credential submission, downloads, and deposits.

Evidence
  • Homepage: Curacao licensing is asserted without a license number or independently verifiable operator details in the observed content.
  • Homepage content assessment: Legal and contact transparency is described as insufficient for verification.
  • Homepage behavior: Mirror-site navigation and APK-download promotion are present alongside account-registration and deposit calls to action.

Summary Verdict

The website has a critical trust posture and should be treated as unsuitable for sensitive interaction. The conclusion is supported by converging malicious-reputation, blacklist, deposit-driven business-model, software-distribution, and disclosure signals, while the site’s real-world operator identity remains unverified.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site is protected by Cloudflare’s CDN/WAF and resolves only to observed Cloudflare edge infrastructure, with no origin-server candidate visible in the analysis. This provides a degree of network-layer mitigation and can limit direct origin exposure, but it does not offset the confirmed reputation and page-level risks.

Closing Assessment

Enterprise, payment, and individual users should suspend account, credential, download, and financial activity involving the site unless authoritative licensing, operator identity, and payment protections are independently established.

Written analysis generated 2026-08-21 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.

What the analysis found

2 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by registration and ownership, analysis engine, behaviour in a sandbox, external reputation.

01 Governance Risk

  • The public registration record for this domain is incomplete.Registration and ownership rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE

02 Sensitive Interaction Risk

  • The analysis matched a pattern TrustSniffer treats as a direct threat to a visitor.Analysis engine signal:direct_threat
  • The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise.Behaviour in a sandbox rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS
  • The structure of the page changed sharply while it was loading.Behaviour in a sandbox rule:BEHAV_DOM_DENSITY_SPIKE
  • Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one.Behaviour in a sandbox rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH
  • The page exchanged network traffic with destinations TrustSniffer does not recognise.Behaviour in a sandbox rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_TRAFFIC
  • An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL

Identity verification

StatusUNVERIFIED
Identity score30/100
Identity verification confidence50%
  • No on-site identity signals detected

Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.

What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of domesticviolence.ru.

  • The request stayed on domesticviolence.ru. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
  • Registration is published under ACTIVE-RU. Clear
  • DNS for this domain is served by com., across 2 name servers. Noted
  • The registration is paid up to 2027-04-05. Noted
  • The earliest public archive of this site is from 2017-11-02. Clear
  • It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. Noted

Domain intelligence

RegistrarACTIVE-RU
HostingCLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US
CountryUS
Server IP2606:4700:3035::6815:2cd6
Name serversrajeev.ns.cloudflare.com., sima.ns.cloudflare.com.
SSL issuerWE1
SSL expiry2026-09-26
Domain age1.38 years (continuous registration)
Domain expiry2027-04-05
Archive first seen2017-11-02
Archive snapshots326
ReputationVirusTotal: 7 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches

About this assessment

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about domesticviolence.ru at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

Common questions about domesticviolence.ru

Is domesticviolence.ru a scam?

TrustSniffer's assessment of domesticviolence.ru found strong scam indicators. It scored 0 out of 100 on 2026-08-21, which is the critical-risk band. The specific signals are listed in the evidence above.

Is domesticviolence.ru safe to use?

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

What is the trust score of domesticviolence.ru?

domesticviolence.ru scored 0 out of 100 on 2026-08-21, which places it in the critical-risk band. The score is built from the domain's age and registration history, its hosting and certificate, the content of the site itself, and third-party reputation data. There is no human rating and no user review in it.

Download this report as PDF Free, no account needed. Create one to keep a history of the sites you check.
By AminRez, Founder & Lead Security Researcher, TrustSniffer
Produced by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine · assessed 2026-08-21 · how we assess · report a mistake