Is firstledvault.com a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

Security Alert

Fortinet, Google, Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website, presented under the name firstledvault.com, is a very recently registered domain whose name suggests a digital-asset vault or ledger-style financial service. The only content captured from the homepage was a protective security interstitial, not a product or service page. No products, claims, or operator identity could be read from the site itself, so its apparent purpose can only be inferred from the name, and that purpose is not supported by any observable business content.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present and decisive. The domain is confirmed blacklisted. A major browser-protection reputation service classifies it under a social-engineering threat category, which is the category used for phishing and deceptive-site warnings. Several independent security engines also rate it malicious or suspicious, and these include multiple top-tier vendors. When the homepage was fetched, the edge provider served an interstitial titled as a suspected-phishing warning in place of the site, so the hosting layer's own screening appears to have reached a similar conclusion. Browser-behaviour testing found no wallet-drainer activity, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms, or credential posts to external destinations, but this does not offset the reputation findings. Eighteen console errors and heavy third-party request traffic were also recorded. A domain of this age with a social-engineering classification fits the lifecycle of a throwaway site built for deceptive onboarding or credential capture. No conflicting legal-entity names were observed, because no legal content could be captured. The risk therefore rests on the reputation findings, not on identity inconsistency. Evidence:

• Homepage: capture was met with a bot challenge (HTTP 403) whose page title read as a suspected-phishing notice.
• Reputation: a browser safe-browsing service lists the domain as social engineering. Eight security engines rate it malicious and three suspicious, including three top-tier vendors.
• Registration: domain registered 2026-08-29 (~0.16 years, ~57 days old), expiring 2027-08-29.
• Web archive: 1 archive snapshot, in 2026 only (first and last seen 2026-09-06, 1 year tracked), so there is no established history.

Regulatory Verification Notes

No legal, terms, privacy, or about pages could be captured, and no licensing, registration number, or corporate entity can be attributed to the operator. Registrant details are incomplete, which amounts to ownership opacity. This is an administrative limitation and is not treated here as an identity contradiction. No regulator or third-party registry link supports the site, and no broker-reputation record exists for it. The missing disclosures are a verification gap, but the decisive concern is the confirmed blacklisting, not the absence of a license. Evidence:

• Homepage: only a roughly 400-character challenge screen was captured, with no legal entity, license, or registration reference.
• Registration: registered through NICENIC International Group Co., Limited, with registrant details incomplete.
• Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US), so hosting reveals nothing about the operator.
• Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV, domain validation only), valid to 2026-11-27 with 32 days remaining. DV confirms domain control, not business identity.

What to Verify Next

Verification should be directed at the operator's claims before any contact, not at the site. If the site is linked to a specific financial or custody service, confirm that service's official domain through an independent source, such as a regulator's public register or a known official channel, and compare it character by character with this domain. Any license or registration claim should be checked directly with the named registry. Official support and contact channels should be confirmed through an offline or independently sourced route. Any message, advertisement, or referral that directed a person to this domain should be treated as potentially deceptive and reported to the platform it came from. Evidence:

• Homepage: no operator, license, or product claim was observable to check, so the reference point must come from outside the site.
• Registration: the domain is only about two months old, so any claim of long-standing operation is inconsistent with the record.
• Reputation: the confirmed safe-browsing classification means any prior link or invitation to this site warrants scrutiny.

Summary Verdict

The overall posture is critical-risk and clearly cautionary. Confirmed multi-source blacklisting of a newly created domain with no verifiable operator or business content outweighs every technical signal in its favour. The site is best regarded as a probable phishing or social-engineering vehicle, and no apparent legitimacy can be attributed to it.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, with all observed addresses being Cloudflare edge servers. The origin server was not observable, so hosting cannot be independently verified. The certificate is valid, and the bot-protection layer behaved normally. These are mitigating technical hygiene factors only. Mainstream protective infrastructure is available to any registrant, including malicious ones, and it does not offset the reputation findings. A young domain with sparse DNS structure adds to the caution.

Closing Assessment

Login, credential entry, wallet connection, account registration, and any payment or transfer should be avoided entirely. Passive viewing is the most that could be considered, and ideally the site should be left alone. Anyone who has already entered credentials or authorised a transaction should change the affected passwords, revoke any wallet permissions, and notify the relevant provider.