Is fomovotes-45.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

Security Alert

Google flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a single-page memecoin trading interface, branded "fomo votes", centred on a token called $SPACEHOOD on a chain named Robinhood Chain. It presents buy and sell controls with preset amounts from $10 to $1,000, a prompt to deposit cash, a trending token list, and a leaderboard of individual traders' profit figures with attached "thesis" comments. Its apparent business model is to draw visitors into depositing funds and trading speculative tokens, with revenue implied from trading fees.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

This is a high-risk site, and the contradictions are confirmed. The domain is on a blacklist, and a major browser-security threat feed has classified it under social engineering, which covers deceptive or phishing-type content. A separate multi-engine reputation scan also returned one malicious and one suspicious detection. Behavioural testing found strong cloaking: the page's content and appearance changed substantially once the sandbox interacted with it. That pattern is consistent with a page that shows different material depending on the visitor's actions. The site sits on a free subdomain of a shared hosting platform and was created only days ago, with a single archive capture to its name. Page analysis flagged a close resemblance between the hostname and the hosting platform's name, but no specific brand impersonation was confirmed. The page's own content adds to the concern. The leaderboard shows unverifiable profit figures such as a trader reporting a gain above $63,000, or +1,151.27% on one position. Another trader's note reads "400k in fees sitting there". A promotional line states "many of you will never hit a 100x. I will." The trending list advertises gains of 66,295.08% and 102,401.75% on individual tokens. Together with a deposit prompt and trade presets, these claims create high-pressure, fear-of-missing-out conditions around funds the operator can take custody of. The token metrics shown (about 5,000 holders, roughly $237K of liquidity) cannot be tied to any independent audit or proof of reserves. The name Robinhood Chain may also lead visitors to assume an association with a well-known financial brand, and the page offers nothing to substantiate one. Evidence:

• Homepage trading view: the deposit prompt, the $10–$1,000 buy presets and the "100x" promotional line, with no risk warning.
• Homepage leaderboard: individual profit figures (for example $59,142.92 and $63,270.44, and +1,151.27%) and the "400k in fees sitting there" comment, none of them verifiable.
• Behavioural sandbox: strong content change after interaction across three runs, and a threat-feed classification for social engineering.
• Domain provenance: created in 2026 (about 8 days old). The web archive holds 1 snapshot, captured on 2026-10-11 (first and last seen on the same date).

Regulatory Verification Notes

The page identifies no operator, company name, registered address, licence, or registration number. It also publishes no terms, privacy policy, or audit report, and it offers no contact channel. The business is a custodial-style deposit and trading service in high-risk digital assets, and for that activity these omissions are material. Owner details are incomplete, so there is no independent route from the site to a responsible legal entity. This is ownership opacity rather than an identity contradiction. On its own, the absence of a licence is a verification gap and not proof of wrongdoing. Here it adds to the confirmed contradictions above. No third-party broker-reputation record matched this site, so that source adds nothing in either direction. Evidence:

• Homepage: no operator, licence, risk disclosure, or contact information is present anywhere in the captured page content.
• Hosting infrastructure: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
• Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by YE2 (DV, domain-validated only), valid to 2026-12-31. This confirms an encrypted connection only, not the identity of the operator.

What to Verify Next

Treat the site as unsafe for any financial or credential interaction until an independent party has established who operates it. The token's contract address should be checked on an independent blockchain explorer, covering holder concentration, liquidity lock status, and any audit. The claim of a link to Robinhood or its chain should be tested by going to that company's official website from a separately sourced address and not through this page. Any claimed operator, licence, or registration should be checked directly with the relevant financial regulator's public register. Official support or contact channels should be confirmed through an independent route and not through the site. Evidence:

• Homepage: the token contract address is shown in truncated form, so the full address needs independent confirmation.
• Homepage: no operator or licence is stated, so any regulatory check has no named entity to start from.
• Threat-feed status: the classification is current as of this analysis and should be rechecked before any reassessment.

Summary Verdict

The available evidence supports a clearly adverse trust posture. Confirmed blacklisting, deceptive-content classification, and cloaking behaviour all point the same way, and the page content matches the profile of a high-pressure speculative scheme. Nothing found offsets this, and the site's operator identity remains unverified.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site is delivered through Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and every observed address is an edge server. The origin server was not observable, so hosting cannot be verified independently. The transport encryption is valid and the hosting provider is mainstream. These are mitigating factors only, and they do not offset the reputation findings. This kind of shared infrastructure is also freely available to new, anonymous sites, so it says nothing about the operator's legitimacy.

Closing Assessment

The site should be avoided for any login, credential entry, deposit, or trade, and nothing should be connected to it or sent to it. Anyone who has already interacted with it should stop, review recent account and wallet activity, and report the page to the relevant security authority.