Is fomovotes.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

Overview

This website is a single-page memecoin trading interface for a token called SPACEHOOD, which the page says is on Robinhood Chain. It runs as a subdomain on a shared free-hosting platform. The page shows a custodial cash balance with a "Deposit more" prompt and buy and sell controls with preset amounts from $10 to $1000. It also shows a leaderboard of trending memecoins and trader profit-and-loss posts. Its apparent business model is earning from trading activity and from paid "fomo votes" that buy token visibility, with no operator named anywhere on the page.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

Confirmed contradictions are present, and this is a high-risk site. Multiple independent threat-intelligence sources currently flag the site: a major browser safe-browsing service lists it for social engineering, and several security engines classify it as malicious. It is therefore blacklisted, and that status alone sets a cautionary posture. No conflicting legal identities and no brand impersonation were observed. The risk comes from the combination of external listings and the page's own mechanics. Funds are held in a custodial balance the user must top up before trading, and the page shows no fee schedule and no description of where deposited value goes. The page also promotes outsized returns. One trader post reads "many of you will never hit a 100x. I will." Listed tokens show gains such as 66,295% and 102,401%, and a trader's note refers to "400k in fees sitting there." None of these claims is backed by any verifiable evidence. The page lists thirteen tokens, several with non-Latin names. Its paid-visibility mechanic lets promoters buy prominence for tokens, a pattern commonly associated with pump-and-dump promotion. Evidence:

• Homepage and vote page: a custodial cash balance, "Deposit more" prompt, and buy/sell widget with fixed amounts up to $1000, shown with no fee or custody terms.
• Homepage: trader posts and leaderboard percentages, including a "100x" boast and the "400k in fees sitting there" remark, with no substantiation.
• Domain registered about 13 days ago (roughly 0.04 years old); web archive holds 1 snapshot, from 2026 (1 year tracked).
• Safe-browsing listing for social engineering plus 3 malicious detections from security engines, confirmed in the site's external reputation check.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The page discloses no operating company, legal status, licence, registration number, physical address, or contact channel. There is no terms page, privacy page, or about page. For a site that takes deposits and executes token purchases, this is a serious gap in disclosure. The operator's identity cannot be independently connected to any real-world person or business, and no regulatory standing is claimed or evidenced. No third-party broker or regulator record was matched. Absent registration is a transparency gap, not proof of fraud by itself. Here it sits alongside the confirmed external listings, which is why it matters for custody of user funds. Evidence:

• Homepage: no company name, licence, address, or contact details anywhere in the roughly 2,200 characters of page text.
• Page metadata: no description, no canonical link, and no structured data, consistent with a hastily assembled page.
• Served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US); TLS certificate issued by YE2 (DV, domain validation only), valid to 2026-12-23.

What to Verify Next

Any interaction should be treated as unsafe until the operator is independently identified. Establish the legal entity behind the service through an independent route, not through links or claims on the page. Confirm whether any financial regulator in the user's jurisdiction recognises a custodial token-trading service of this kind. Check the SPACEHOOD token contract and its liquidity and holder concentration independently on a public blockchain explorer, rather than relying on the page's own market statistics. Confirm official support and contact channels through an offline or independently sourced route. Evidence:

• Vote page: token contract address shown on the page can be checked against on-chain records.
• Homepage: stated holder count, liquidity, and top-holder share are unverified, page-supplied figures.
• Terms and contact pages: none exist, so no on-site route to the operator is available.

Summary Verdict

The overall posture is high risk. Confirmed external listings, a very recently created domain, an anonymous operator, and a deposit-first custodial model with extravagant return claims converge on the same conclusion. The valid encryption certificate and the clean connection behaviour do not outweigh these factors. The site cannot be treated as legitimate.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site is served entirely through Cloudflare's CDN and web-application firewall, and every observed address belongs to its edge network, so the origin server is not visible. This protection is a mitigating factor only. It reflects a commonly used, reputable platform, not evidence of the operator's legitimacy. It also prevents independent hosting verification and can mask rapid content changes. The valid DV certificate confirms only encrypted transport and says nothing about who runs the site.

Closing Assessment

The site should be limited to read-only viewing at most. No credentials, deposits, wallet connections, or purchases should be made through it, and any funds already placed there should be treated as at risk and reported to the relevant platform or consumer authority.