Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
ghost-holding.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.
| What this site appears to be | Ghost Wallet is a crypto wallet connection tool that offers a read-only valuation of connected wallet holdings, framed as a 'ghost' portfolio that compares what the user has kept against what they have sold or spent. It lists many supported wallets and includes a short FAQ stating that the service never has access to funds. No pricing, legal identity, or contact details are visible in the provided text. |
|---|
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 7 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | Not availableNo registration record was returned | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by YE2 | Noted |
| Hosted by | CLOUDFLARENETServer in US | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
- The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
Ghost Wallet is a single-page crypto utility served from a free shared subdomain of a developer hosting platform. It presents a gamified "ghost portfolio" concept. The page tells the visitor that somewhere there is a version of them that never sold or spent anything, and it invites them to "summon" that version by connecting a wallet or entering an ENS name or address. It then compares the holdings of the two. It lists a long roster of supported wallets, offers XRP and TRON variants, and gives a short FAQ. Its apparent purpose is a read-only portfolio valuation tool, but no monetization model, operator or pricing is stated.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
This assessment is clearly cautionary. Multiple independent threat-intelligence sources flag the site as malicious, including several tier-one security vendors, so the site is blacklisted on external reputation feeds. This is the decisive factor. The homepage also pairs a "Connect Wallet" prompt with interface text reading "Transaction signed" and "Signature Confirmed". It asks the visitor to accept a connection request in a Tron wallet and to "reload the page and verify a different wallet". Those mechanics are the same ones wallet-draining pages use. The FAQ asserts "We never have access to your funds", but nothing on the site backs the claim. A signature request is also not a read-only action, however the page frames it. Automated browsing of the homepage showed heavy traffic to third-party destinations. Most of the page's requests went to external hosts, and many of the outbound data submissions and background calls went to destinations outside any recognised allow-list. That is out of proportion for a static one-page viewer with no forms. The page also produced a high volume of script errors. The site sits on a shared hosting subdomain that resembles the hosting platform's own name, which weakens any claim to a distinct brand identity. No conflicting legal entities were observed, because the site names no entity at all. Evidence:
- Homepage: wallet-connection prompt with transaction-signing and signature-confirmation text, plus instructions to accept a connection request in a Tron wallet.
- Homepage behavioural capture: 15 external background requests and 12 external data submissions, 9 of each to non-allow-listed destinations. Up to 81.2% of activity was external, and 36 console errors were logged.
- Homepage FAQ: "We never have access to your funds" claim with no supporting attestation, audit or operator.
- External reputation: 7 malicious and 1 suspicious detections across the security-vendor panel, including three tier-one vendors.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The homepage carries no company name, legal entity, registration number, licence reference, physical address or contact channel. The ownership and governance of the service are therefore entirely opaque, and the page makes no regulated-activity claim. Because it asks visitors to link wallets and sign messages, the missing accountability trail matters. There is no named party to hold responsible if a signature is misused, and the claim that the service is "read only" cannot be tied to any operator. No third-party broker or regulator record was matched to this site. Evidence:
- Homepage and FAQ: no legal identity, licence statement, address or contact details, and no pricing or monetization explanation.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- Transport security: TLS certificate issued by YE2 (DV, domain validation only), valid to 2026-12-26. This confirms an encrypted connection and says nothing about operator identity.
What to Verify Next
The site's own page does not allow independent confirmation of who runs it. Any evaluator should first look for a named operator, whether a company, team or developer, through independent sources. They should then check whether the service is documented by a reputable wallet-analytics or portfolio-tracking provider. If the service claims to be affiliated with any of the wallets it lists, that affiliation should be confirmed on those wallet providers' official channels, not through this page. The "read only" claim should be assessed by examining what permission and signature requests a wallet would display, using a test wallet holding no assets. Official support or contact channels should be located through an independent route. Evidence:
- Homepage: lists many wallets, including MetaMask, Ledger, Trust Wallet, OKX, Binance Web3 Wallet and TronLink, with no stated partnership.
- Homepage: allows aggregation of up to five addresses and offers an ENS-name demo, so analysis can be done without connecting a wallet.
- Homepage: no linked documentation, terms, privacy policy or audit.
Summary Verdict
Available evidence places this site in a high-risk posture. Confirmed adverse reputation from multiple security sources, a wallet-signing interaction pattern, and an unidentified operator converge on a clearly cautionary conclusion. The "read only" presentation is an unverified claim and does not offset the external detections.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site is fronted by Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and every observed address is a CDN edge address, so the origin host could not be observed. This is a mitigating factor only: it shows the site is delivered through mainstream, reputable infrastructure, but it does not establish legitimacy and cannot offset the external threat detections. Edge-only visibility also prevents independent hosting verification and would allow page content to be swapped quickly without any visible change in hosting.
Closing Assessment
Do not connect a wallet, approve any signature or enter credentials on this site. If the concept is of interest, use a reputable, identifiable portfolio tracker that works from a public address alone. Anyone who has already connected a wallet or signed a request here should review and revoke the associated permissions.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, page content, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.
01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
02 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to.Page content
rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED - The page content shows at least one warning sign that deceptive sites commonly use.Page content
rule:PAGE_RED_FLAGS_SOME - The browser raised a warning while loading the page.Page content
rule:PAGE_BROWSER_FLAGS_SUSPICIOUS
03 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH
04 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete.Registration and ownership
rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE
Identity verification
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |
- No on-site identity signals detected
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of ghost-holding.pages.dev.
- The request stayed on ghost-holding.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2f2c |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | YE2 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-26 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 7 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about ghost-holding.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.