Verdict
hats.hu is low-trust and potentially risky.
Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.
| What this site appears to be | Hungarian-language local business site offering drone photography and videography services with packaged pricing and contact information. Cookie notice present. No login or financial deposit flows detected. |
|---|
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: UNKNOWN
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 1 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0 reportsAbuseIPDB; shared hosting inflates this count | Noted |
| Domain age | 22 years oldRegistered history | Clear |
| Web archive | Archived since 2004Public history exists | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by YR2 | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: more than 10 years (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2004.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Overview
This Hungarian-language website presents a local drone photography and videography business offering aerial images, videos, property marketing, agricultural monitoring, building inspections, and bespoke commercial work, with time-based service packages and contact details for prospective customers.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
The site’s visible content is coherent with a small local service provider: the homepage describes drone photography and videography, lists property, agricultural, and structural-inspection use cases, and advertises 15-minute and 30-minute packages priced at 28,000 HUF and 56,000 HUF respectively, alongside custom work. It does not present a login, cryptocurrency, deposit, or other sensitive financial interaction. However, this benign presentation is outweighed by a confirmed blacklist hit and separate external detections recording one malicious and one suspicious result. An automated brand-similarity signal associated the domain with “t.me,” although the available page review did not confirm impersonation, phishing, or a conflicting legal identity. No identity contradiction was observed, but the blacklist finding is sufficient to make sensitive interaction inappropriate.
- Homepage: Hungarian-language drone photography and videography services, packaged pricing, and property, agriculture, and building-inspection applications.
- Homepage behavior: no login form, hidden sensitive form, wallet connection, credential collection, or financial deposit flow detected.
- External reputation telemetry: the domain is recorded as blacklisted, with 1 malicious and 1 suspicious detection among evaluated results.
- Registration and archive telemetry: registered 2004-06-04 (~22.22 years old); 101 archive snapshots spanning 2004–2025 (22 years tracked).
Regulatory Verification Notes
The available content identifies a service offering and provides contact details, but independent operator identity remains unverified. No licensing authority or license number is claimed in the supplied site content; for a drone-services business, this is a regulatory and disclosure item requiring confirmation rather than standalone evidence of fraud. The third-party broker dataset did not match the site, so it provides no additional broker-reputation signal. The site’s technical presentation is operationally established, but a valid transport certificate and hosting arrangement do not establish the legal entity behind the service.
- Homepage and contact section: service description and contact details are present, while the operator’s independently verified legal identity is not established.
- Site disclosures: no licensing authority or license number is stated in the supplied business information.
- Hosting telemetry: served from AS8560 (IONOS-AS — IONOS SE, DE).
- Transport security telemetry: TLS certificate issued by YR2, DV validation, valid to 2026-11-08.
What to Verify Next
Before any payment, contract, credential submission, or exchange of sensitive business information, the prospective customer should independently confirm the operator’s legal name, invoicing identity, business registration, insurance position, and any aviation permissions relevant to the proposed work. Payment should use a method offering documented dispute or chargeback protection, and contact channels should be confirmed through an independently sourced business record rather than relying solely on the website. The blacklist result should also be resolved with the relevant security or service provider before engagement.
- The site offers one-time paid packages and bespoke quotations, creating a need to validate the contracting and invoicing party before payment.
- The operator identity is unverified in the available evidence.
- The site contains no claimed license number or licensing authority to independently corroborate.
Summary Verdict
The overall posture is low trust with elevated sensitive-interaction risk. The site’s service presentation is plausible and technically functional, but the confirmed external blacklist finding and unresolved identity assurance prevent the website from being treated as a trusted commercial counterparty.
Infrastructure Integrity
The website is protected by a CDN/WAF layer, and all observed addressing was associated with the edge rather than an observable origin server. This reduces direct exposure of the underlying host and is a mitigating control, but it does not validate the operator or offset the external reputation concern.
Closing Assessment
Engagement should remain limited until the operator, contracting arrangements, and reputation finding have been independently resolved; any unavoidable transaction should use strong payment protections and avoid sharing unnecessary sensitive information.
Written analysis generated 2026-08-19 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
2 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by registration and ownership, analysis engine.
01 Governance Risk
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete.Registration and ownership
rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE
02 Sensitive Interaction Risk
- The analysis matched a pattern TrustSniffer treats as a direct threat to a visitor.Analysis engine
signal:direct_threat
Identity verification
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |
- No on-site identity signals detected
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of hats.hu.
- The request stayed on hats.hu. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2004-10-15. Clear
- It is hosted on IONOS-AS, from a server in DE. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | IONOS-AS - IONOS SE, DE |
| Country | DE |
| Server IP | 87.106.149.56 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| SSL issuer | YR2 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-11-08 |
| Domain age | 22.22 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2004-10-15 |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about hats.hu at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.