Is jupiter-perp.pro a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 3/100

Security Alert

Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

The website at the domain jupiter-perp.pro presents itself as a single-page crypto derivatives trading venue. Its page title offers perpetual-futures trading on SOL, BTC and ETH with leverage of up to 250x. The apparent business model is to attract traders to deposit funds into a leveraged trading product. The page has substantial text content but no verifiable corporate identity behind it.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

The evidence shows confirmed adverse contradictions. The domain is blacklisted: a large cluster of independent security engines classify it as malicious, with additional engines rating it suspicious. These include several top-tier vendors. This detection pattern is strong enough to override every protective signal. Those signals include a valid certificate and clean behavioural telemetry. In controlled sandbox runs, the homepage made no external data calls, no wallet-drainer or clipboard-hijack activity appeared, and no hidden forms were found. A clean sandbox run does not offset a blacklisting. Malicious behaviour can be conditional, delayed, or aimed at specific visitors. The product theme adds to the concern. A 250x leverage ceiling on volatile assets is a headline lure typical of fraudulent trading platforms, because a very small adverse price move liquidates a position entirely. A newly registered domain that sells this product and carries a malicious classification fits the profile of a short-lived fund-collection scheme. No conflicting legal identities or confirmed brand impersonation were found. The risk therefore rests on the threat-detection record and the site's profile, not on proven identity fraud.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The captured page gives no clear disclosure of a legal entity, licence, or registration number for a service that offers highly leveraged derivatives. The evidence therefore does not allow the operator to be tied to any real-world company or individual. Independent identity checks remain unresolved, and the operator's identity should be treated as unknown. Offering leveraged derivatives to the public would normally call for visible regulatory authorisation and clear terms. That gap is a verification shortfall, not proof of fraud on its own. Here it sits alongside the confirmed threat detections. No third-party broker database entry matched this site, so no outside reputational context supports or contradicts it.

What to Verify Next

Any claim of authorisation should be checked directly against the official register of the relevant financial regulator. The site's own statements are not sufficient for that check. Any official social, support, or documentation channels should be confirmed through independent routes, not through links on the site. Any listed token or protocol should also be checked against well-known aggregators of legitimate platforms. A site that is genuinely legitimate would normally be traceable there. Existing detections should be rechecked later to see whether they persist, since only a sustained clean record would change this posture.

Summary Verdict

The website carries a critical trust posture. Active malicious-site detections from multiple independent engines outweigh every neutral or positive technical signal. The site is also new, its operator is unverified, and its commercial profile is consistent with high-risk fund-collection schemes. Available evidence does not support treating this site as legitimate.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site resolves to a single IP address at a hosting provider in the United Arab Emirates, with no CDN or WAF in front of it. The origin server is therefore directly exposed, and no protective layer offsets the reputation risk. Six abuse reports exist against the IP address, which sits in shared data-centre hosting. They concern shared provider infrastructure, so they are a weak, non-decisive signal about this site. The certificate and DNS configuration are technically sound, but these basics are easily obtained by malicious sites.

Closing Assessment

The site should be treated as read-only at most, and ideally avoided. Wallet connections, account sign-ups, credential entry, and deposits of any kind are inappropriate while the malicious classifications stand. Anyone who has already interacted with it should stop, revoke any wallet permissions granted, and move funds to a clean wallet.

Signals weighed against the site

• AbuseIPDB: 6 reports on hosting IP 186.2.175.35 (IQWeb FZ-LLC, Data Center/Web Hosting/Transit), 11% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.