Is kokomoji.web.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

Overview

Kokomoji is a small web application presented under a shared web-app hosting namespace. Its homepage is titled as a collection of 3,333 faces "assembled on-chain", which points to a blockchain-based digital collectible or NFT-style project aimed at visitors interested in on-chain generative artwork. The captured page offered no further business detail, so the commercial model behind the collection is not established.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present and decisive. The domain is carried on confirmed blacklist listings from third-party threat-intelligence sources. Several independent security engines classify it as malicious, and a further engine rates it suspicious. This is the evidence behind the cautionary posture and is not offset by any positive signal on the site. Separately, four abuse reports exist against a delivery-network address the site resolves to. They attach to a shared provider address rather than to the site specifically, so they are corroborating background and not independent proof of wrongdoing. No brand impersonation and no conflicting legal identities were observed. The risk therefore rests entirely on the blacklist and reputation evidence. Sandbox testing of the homepage found no wallet-connection prompts, no clipboard manipulation, no hidden or externally posting credential forms, and no cloaking. This lowers the likelihood of an active drainer on the page as captured, but does not neutralise the external listings. The page can change after capture, and the listings indicate that at least some detection sources have seen hostile behaviour. Evidence:

• Homepage: multi-engine reputation check recorded 4 malicious and 1 suspicious verdicts against 57 harmless and 31 undetected, which triggered the blacklist classification.
• Homepage behaviour: 3 of 3 sandbox runs completed, with 9 external XHR/POST requests, none to non-whitelisted destinations, and 0 wallet-connect, clipboard-write, hidden-form or cloaking events.
• Hosting address: 4 abuse reports with a low confidence score, categorised as shared-infrastructure reports rather than site-specific ones.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The site's real-world operator has not been independently connected to a named person or company, and the evidence supplies no licence, registration or regulated-entity status. An on-chain collectible project does not by itself imply a regulated activity. Nothing here supports treating the site as supervised, and any financial promises it makes would carry no regulatory protection. Third-party broker-reputation datasets hold no entry for the site. This is neutral and is not an endorsement. The transport layer is technically sound but carries no identity assurance. A domain-validated certificate only proves control of the hostname. It does not prove who operates the site. Evidence:

• Hosting infrastructure: served from AS54113 (Fastly, Inc., US), registered with ARIN.
• Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WR4 (DV), valid to 2026-12-22.
• Identity assessment: operator identity remains unverified, and no licensing or entity disclosure was found on the captured homepage.

What to Verify Next

Before any interaction beyond viewing, the collection's claimed provenance should be tested independently. The 3,333-item on-chain claim can be checked against the contract address on a public block explorer, looking at deployer history and verified source code. Any social or marketplace accounts linked from the site should be checked from the platforms' own official listings rather than from links on the page. Official support and contact channels should also be confirmed through an independent route. If the reputation listings clear, a fresh scan is the way to confirm it. The listings are the controlling issue, so they should be re-checked directly with the reporting sources before any decision to engage. Evidence:

• Homepage title: claims 3,333 faces assembled on-chain, which is verifiable against a public ledger.
• Reputation listings: current blacklist status is the controlling variable and should be re-checked at source.
• Operator identity: no named operator is available to check against any registry.

Summary Verdict

The site's posture is elevated risk, driven by confirmed threat-intelligence listings and not by any observed impersonation or identity conflict. Technical hygiene is adequate but cannot offset the reputational evidence. Legitimacy cannot be inferred from the evidence available, and the operator's identity remains unestablished.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site is delivered through Fastly, a mainstream content delivery network. Every observed address is a delivery-edge address, so the origin server is not observable and hosting cannot be independently verified. Edge delivery of this kind can also mask rapid content changes. This is a mitigating factor for availability and baseline hygiene only. It does not offset the external threat detections and is not evidence of legitimacy.

Closing Assessment

Treat the site as read-only. Do not log in, connect a wallet, sign transactions, enter credentials, or make any payment or financial commitment through it. Nothing should be downloaded from it until the blacklist listings are independently cleared.

Signals weighed against the site

• AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 2620:0:890::100 (Google LLC, Content Delivery Network), 3% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.