Is lionlilly.com safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 40/100

lionlilly.com
Download PDF Check another site How we score

Verdict

40 OUT OF 100
Low Trust

lionlilly.com is low-trust and potentially risky.

Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.

Sensitive Interaction Risk Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-08-21 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

What this site appears to beA regional web design and development agency in Chennai/Coimbatore offering web design, branding, e-commerce, CMS, hosting and SEO services. Content is marketing-oriented and lists services and portfolio; no login or transactional flows are present in the provided HTML.

Evidence status and limitations

Evidence completeness: UNKNOWN

  • The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
  • Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

Malware engines3 flagged itVirusTotalRisk
Google Safe BrowsingNot listedGoogleClear
Abuse reports on the host0 reportsAbuseIPDB; shared hosting inflates this countNoted
Domain age19 years oldRegistered historyClear
Web archiveArchived since 2007Public history existsClear
CertificateEncrypted connectionIssued by ZeroSSL RSA DV SSL CA 2Noted

The page as captured

https://lionlilly.com/
Screenshot of the lionlilly.com homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment
What lionlilly.com served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-08-21. The page may look different now.

Key findings

  • Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
  • Domain age: more than 10 years (registration continuity).
  • Public web-archive history exists since 2007.
  • At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

Full analysis

Overview

lionlilly.com presents itself as a Chennai- and Coimbatore-based web design and development agency offering website design, branding, e-commerce development, content-management systems, hosting, web applications, search-engine optimization, and related printing services, with revenue apparently derived from client projects and associated service packages.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

The site’s visible content is consistent with a conventional agency and contains no detected login form, sensitive submission form, wallet connection, or obvious phishing mechanism in the supplied page capture. However, this benign presentation is outweighed by confirmed external threat contradictions: the domain has been identified by multiple blacklist signals, including malicious and suspicious detections. The long registration history and historical web presence do not resolve the current reputation conflict; accordingly, the site should be treated as unsuitable for credentials, financial information, or other sensitive interaction unless independently cleared. No conflicting legal-entity names or brand-impersonation indicators were observed.

Evidence
  • External reputation assessment recorded 3 malicious detections and 1 suspicious detection for the domain; a confirmed blacklist condition was also present.
  • The homepage identifies a web design agency and lists commercial services, but the supplied HTML contains 0 forms, 0 sensitive forms, and no login form.
  • Domain registration records show creation on 2007-12-08 and an age of 18.71 years; the registrar is Squarespace Domains II LLC.
  • Historical records contain 160 archive snapshots spanning 2007–2026, covering 20 years.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The homepage provides a clear commercial description of the agency’s services, but the supplied pages do not provide an independently verifiable license or registration number. For a web-design and hosting provider, this is primarily a disclosure and counterparty-verification gap rather than standalone evidence of fraud. The site’s identity remains unverified on the available evidence, so its stated business description should not be treated as proof of the real-world operator. A third-party broker dataset did not produce a matching record, which is neutral context rather than a regulatory finding.

Evidence
  • The homepage names Chennai and Coimbatore as operating locations and describes web design, branding, e-commerce, CMS, hosting, application development, SEO, and affiliated printing services.
  • The supplied homepage content contains no stated license authority or license number.
  • Hosting telemetry records AS47583, AS-HOSTINGER – Hostinger International Limited, CY, with service resolved in Lithuania.
  • The site uses a DV TLS certificate issued by ZeroSSL RSA DV SSL CA 2, valid through 2026-09-02.

What to Verify Next

Before any commercial engagement, the counterparty should be independently connected to a legal entity through an offline or otherwise trusted channel, and the agency’s invoicing, contractual terms, refund position, and service-delivery commitments should be reviewed. Any registration or licensing requirement applicable to the proposed hosting or business service should be checked directly with the relevant official registry. Sensitive account creation, credential sharing, or payment should remain deferred until those checks and the site’s current reputation status have been resolved.

Evidence
  • Use the About and Contact pages to obtain the stated business identity and independently confirm it through a separate communication channel.
  • Check the applicable official business or sector registry rather than relying solely on the website’s own descriptions.
  • Review the site’s stated hosting, printing, support, and service-delivery terms before issuing payment or transferring operational access.

Summary Verdict

The overall posture is low trust with elevated sensitive-interaction risk. The site has a plausible agency presentation and established technical history, but those positive characteristics do not overcome the confirmed external reputation contradictions or the lack of independently verified operator identity. Normal browsing may be possible, but the available evidence does not support treating the site as a trusted business counterparty.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site resolves directly to a single likely origin address, with no CDN detected and no edge-IP layer identified. Its infrastructure is hosted on AS47583 by Hostinger International Limited; this provides a conventional hosting environment but offers no independent assurance of legitimacy and does not offset the reputation findings.

Closing Assessment

The appropriate posture is to avoid sensitive interaction and defer credentials, financial transactions, and operational access until independent counterparty verification and current threat-status review are complete.

Written analysis generated 2026-08-21 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.

What the analysis found

2 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by registration and ownership, analysis engine, behaviour in a sandbox.

01 Governance Risk

  • The registration record withholds contact details for the operator.Registration and ownership rule:KF_WHOIS_HIDDEN
  • Registration details are held behind a privacy service, so no operator is named publicly. This is common and legal, and it also means there is nobody to check.Registration and ownership rule:KF_WHOIS_PRIVATE

02 Sensitive Interaction Risk

  • The analysis matched a pattern TrustSniffer treats as a direct threat to a visitor.Analysis engine signal:direct_threat
  • The structure of the page changed sharply while it was loading.Behaviour in a sandbox rule:BEHAV_DOM_DENSITY_SPIKE

Identity verification

StatusUNVERIFIED
Identity score30/100
Identity verification confidence25%
  • No on-site identity signals detected

Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.

What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of lionlilly.com.

  • The request stayed on lionlilly.com. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
  • Registration is published under Squarespace Domains II LLC. Clear
  • DNS for this domain is served by googledomains.com, across 4 name servers. Noted
  • The registration is paid up to 2026-12-08. Noted
  • The earliest public archive of this site is from 2007-12-15. Clear
  • It is hosted on AS-HOSTINGER, from a server in LT. Noted

Domain intelligence

RegistrarSquarespace Domains II LLC
HostingAS-HOSTINGER - Hostinger International Limited, CY
CountryLT
Server IP72.60.205.92
Name serversNS-CLOUD-C1.GOOGLEDOMAINS.COM, NS-CLOUD-C2.GOOGLEDOMAINS.COM, NS-CLOUD-C3.GOOGLEDOMAINS.COM, NS-CLOUD-C4.GOOGLEDOMAINS.COM
SSL issuerZeroSSL RSA DV SSL CA 2
SSL expiry2026-09-02
Domain age18.71 years (continuous registration)
Domain expiry2026-12-08
Archive first seen2007-12-15
Archive snapshotsNot counted (archive lookup incomplete)
ReputationVirusTotal: 3 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches

About this assessment

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about lionlilly.com at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

Common questions about lionlilly.com

Is lionlilly.com a scam?

TrustSniffer found several risk patterns on lionlilly.com. It scored 40 out of 100 on 2026-08-21, a low-trust result. That is not proof of fraud: it means the evidence did not support treating the site as safe.

Is lionlilly.com safe to use?

Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.

What is the trust score of lionlilly.com?

lionlilly.com scored 40 out of 100 on 2026-08-21, which places it in the low-trust band. The score is built from the domain's age and registration history, its hosting and certificate, the content of the site itself, and third-party reputation data. There is no human rating and no user review in it.

Download this report as PDF Free, no account needed. Create one to keep a history of the sites you check.
By AminRez, Founder & Lead Security Researcher, TrustSniffer
Produced by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine · assessed 2026-08-21 · how we assess · report a mistake