Is listshelping.forum a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

listshelping.forum
Download PDF Check another site How we score

Verdict

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

0 OUT OF 100
Critical Risk

listshelping.forum shows high-risk / scam indicators.

Sensitive Interaction Risk Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-19 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

What this site appears to beA short interstitial advertising a free community vote for a CoinMarketCap listing, with a Continue button leading to an unnamed 'secure voting page' behind a 'PROTECTION LAYER' gate. The claimed affiliation with CoinMarketCap and the MarketVote operator are unverified, and no legal identity, contact details or voting rules are shown.

Evidence status and limitations

Evidence completeness: Not recorded

  • The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
  • Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

Malware engines6 flagged itVirusTotalRisk
Google Safe BrowsingNot listedGoogleClear
Abuse reports on the host0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reportsClear
Domain age26 days oldMost scam domains are under a year oldRisk
Web archiveArchived since 20261 snapshotClear
CertificateEncrypted connectionIssued by YR1Noted

The page as captured

https://listshelping.forum/
Screenshot of the listshelping.forum homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment
What listshelping.forum served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-19. The page may look different now.

Key findings

  • Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
  • Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
  • Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
  • At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

Full analysis

Security Alert

Fortinet, Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

The website is a single-screen crypto "community vote" interstitial that announces a live CoinMarketCap community listing vote and invites visitors to press a Continue button to cast a free vote on a "secure voting page". The page carries almost no content: a short call to action, a "PROTECTION LAYER" label, and a 2026 copyright line crediting a brand called MarketVote. It names no operator, and its apparent purpose is to funnel crypto-interested visitors toward a separate, unnamed destination under the borrowed credibility of a well-known listing platform.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present, and they converge on an elevated-risk reading. Several major security vendors independently flag the domain as malicious or suspicious, and it also appears on an external blacklist, so it is blacklisted by third-party threat sources. The page's own content points the same way. It invokes CoinMarketCap as the sponsor of a "live" listing vote but offers no evidence of that relationship, no voting rules, and no legal entity or contact route. The Continue button redirects to a voting page that the homepage never identifies. This is the classic shape of a lure page. A free, low-effort action borrows a trusted brand and moves the visitor to a second-stage page that can request wallet connections, signatures or credentials. The page itself shows no login form, hidden form or wallet prompt, so the destination is where any harm would occur. Automated sandbox runs also recorded several inline scripts flagged as suspicious and a very large DOM rewrite after interaction, which is out of proportion to a 210-character page and consistent with content being swapped in behind the interstitial. The page's "PROTECTION LAYER" gate adds no verifiable security; it can equally serve to screen automated scanners from the real destination. No brand impersonation was formally confirmed, and no conflicting legal identities exist because none are disclosed. Evidence:

  • Homepage: the only substantive text claims that the CoinMarketCap community listing vote is live and that a free vote can be cast via the Continue button, with no operator, rules or contact detail.
  • Homepage: the redirect target after Continue is an unnamed "secure voting page", and the only brand shown is MarketVote in the footer.
  • Domain registration: created on 2026-09-23 (~0.07 years old, roughly three weeks), so the domain is brand new.
  • Web archive: 1 snapshot, first and last seen 2026-09-25 (1 year tracked), so there is no prior history behind the site.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The site makes no licensing, registration or regulatory claim, and none can be tied to the entity behind it. The homepage lists no company name, registration number, jurisdiction, terms or privacy page. Ownership and governance are opaque on the site itself. This is a disclosure gap, and it matters more here because the page presents itself as connected to an established listing platform and asks visitors to proceed to an unspecified destination. No third-party broker or regulatory-database entry was matched, so no external reputational context exists to offset the lack of on-site identity. The pattern of an unnamed operator, no stated value flow and no rules governing the vote means that no regulated or accountable counterparty can currently be identified. Evidence:

  • Homepage: no legal entity, license, registration number or address appears anywhere on the page, including the footer that credits MarketVote.
  • Hosting: served from AS207043 (DEDIK SERVICES LIMITED), a data-center hosting provider registered in Bulgaria.
  • Domain registration: registered through Registrar.eu, with an expiry date of 2027-09-23.
  • Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by YR1 at domain-validation level only, valid to 2026-12-22. This confirms an encrypted channel, not the operator's identity.

What to Verify Next

Any claimed link to CoinMarketCap should be checked through that platform's own official channels, reached independently of this site, to confirm whether a community listing vote of this kind exists and whether this domain is authorized. The voting destination should not be opened with a wallet-enabled browser profile or any account that holds funds. Any follow-up should be limited to isolated, read-only inspection by a security team. Official support and contact channels for the claimed sponsor and for MarketVote should be confirmed through an independent route before any engagement. If the site reached a user through a message, social post or advert, that source should be treated as part of the lure and reported. Evidence:

  • Homepage: the vote is described as "free" with no stated cost, reward or token, so the value flow can be established only from the destination page, which the homepage does not name.
  • Homepage: the Continue control routes to an unverified second-stage page, which is the step that needs isolated inspection.
  • Homepage: no voting rules, operator identity or channel for questions is provided, so the claim cannot be checked on the site itself.

Summary Verdict

The available evidence supports an elevated-risk, clearly cautionary posture. Independent threat detections, a thin lure-style page built on an unverified brand claim, and a domain with no established history reinforce one another. Nothing in the evidence offsets them, and the site should not be treated as a legitimate or trustworthy destination.

Infrastructure Integrity

The domain resolves through Cloudflare's CDN/WAF, which is a mitigating factor only and does not offset the external threat detections. The edge layer also means that the underlying origin server was not observable. The single observed address sits on a shared data-center hosting provider, and the two abuse reports against it apply to that shared provider address rather than specifically to this site, so they carry little weight here. The domain's very young age and sparse DNS footprint are unconfirmed heuristics and are consistent with, but do not independently establish, a short-lived deployment. The valid TLS certificate shows only that traffic is encrypted.

Closing Assessment

The site should be treated as a read-only curiosity at most. Credentials, wallet connections, signatures, payments and any form of login should be withheld from it and from the voting page it leads to, and the link should be reported or blocked where organizational controls allow.

Written analysis generated 2026-10-19 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.

What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, page content, behaviour in a sandbox.

01 External reputation

  • An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL

02 Page content

  • The page content shows three or more warning signs that deceptive sites commonly use.Page content rule:PAGE_RED_FLAGS_STRONG
  • The page shows few of the signs expected from a trustworthy operator.Page content rule:PAGE_TRUST_QUALITY_LOW
  • The review of the page content rated it moderate risk.Page content rule:PAGE_RISK_MED

03 Behaviour in a sandbox

  • The page carried inline scripts written in a style TrustSniffer treats as suspicious.Behaviour in a sandbox rule:BEHAV_SUSPICIOUS_INLINE_SCRIPTS
  • The structure of the page changed sharply while it was loading.Behaviour in a sandbox rule:BEHAV_DOM_DENSITY_SPIKE

Signals weighed against the site

  • AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 91.92.43.159 (DEDIK SERVICES LIMITED, Data Center/Web Hosting/Transit), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

Identity verification

StatusUNVERIFIED
Identity score30/100
Identity verification confidence50%
  • No on-site identity signals detected

Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.

What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of listshelping.forum.

  • The request stayed on listshelping.forum. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
  • Registration is published under Registrar.eu. Clear
  • DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. Noted
  • The registration is paid up to 2027-09-23. Noted
  • The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-25. Clear
  • It is hosted on DEDIK-IO, from a server in BG. Noted

Domain intelligence

RegistrarRegistrar.eu
HostingDEDIK-IO - DEDIK SERVICES LIMITED, GB
CountryBG
Server IP91.92.43.159
Name serversray.ns.cloudflare.com, vera.ns.cloudflare.com
CDN / edge networkDetected (cloudflare)
Resolved IP addresses1
Edge IP addresses1
Likely origin IP addresses0
SSL issuerYR1
SSL expiry2026-12-22
Domain age0.07 years (continuous registration)
Domain expiry2027-09-23
Archive first seen2026-09-25
Archive snapshots1
ReputationVirusTotal: 6 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches

About this assessment

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about listshelping.forum at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

Already paid or signed in? Do this now

Act fast. The sooner your bank knows, the better the chance of stopping the payment.

  1. Call your bank or card company now. Use the number on the back of your card. Ask them to stop or reverse the payment.
  2. Paid with crypto? Contact the exchange or wallet app you sent it from today. Give them the address you paid.
  3. Signed in or shared a password? Change it now, on every site where you use it, and turn on two-step sign-in.
  4. Report it to the police. In the US you can also report at reportfraud.ftc.gov and ic3.gov. In other countries, use your national police or fraud reporting service.
  5. Keep the evidence. Save screenshots, receipts, emails and chat messages. Your bank and the police will ask for them.
  6. Ignore anyone who offers to get your money back for a fee. These "recovery" offers are often a second scam.

Looking for the real site? Type the company name into a search engine yourself, or use the web address printed on your card, bill or letter. Do not use links from messages or ads.

Common questions about listshelping.forum

Is listshelping.forum a scam?

TrustSniffer's assessment of listshelping.forum found strong scam indicators. It scored 0 out of 100 on 2026-10-19, which is the critical-risk band. The specific signals are listed in the evidence above.

Is listshelping.forum safe to use?

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

What is the trust score of listshelping.forum?

listshelping.forum scored 0 out of 100 on 2026-10-19, which places it in the critical-risk band. The score is built from the domain's age and registration history, its hosting and certificate, the content of the site itself, and third-party reputation data. There is no human rating and no user review in it.

Download this report as PDF Free, no account needed. Create one to keep a history of the sites you check.
By AminRez, Founder & Lead Security Researcher, TrustSniffer
Produced by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine · assessed 2026-10-19 · how we assess · report a mistake