Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
mintest-phi.vercel.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 17 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Listed as unsafeGoogle | Risk |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 82 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | Not availableNo registration record was returned | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by WR1 | Noted |
| Hosted by | AMAZON-02Server in US | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
This is a single-page website on a free vercel.app developer-hosting subdomain. Its browser title presents it as "OpenSea.io", a marketplace-style brand name, rather than under any name tied to its own domain. A visitor sees a landing page of roughly 2,700 characters of text. The evidence does not establish a business model or product offering, and the operator's real-world identity has not been independently confirmed. The pairing of a borrowed brand title with a throwaway subdomain is the pattern typically used to lure visitors into trusting a page they would not otherwise trust.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
Contradictory signals are present and decisive. The site is blacklisted by multiple independent sources. The browser-safety service flags it for social engineering, the page that would normally host a deceptive login or wallet prompt. A large cluster of security engines also rate it malicious, including three tier-one vendors, and this combined detection is what places the site in a high-risk posture. The browser title also claims a well-known marketplace brand that the hosting domain has no visible connection to, which is consistent with brand imitation. The brand claim by itself is not proof of a spoofing campaign, but it reinforces the blacklist findings. A separate set of abuse reports exists against one of the shared addresses serving the site. It belongs to the hosting platform's common infrastructure rather than to this site specifically, so it is discounted and does not add to the conclusion. In the sandbox the page made no external requests, attempted no wallet connections, showed no clipboard manipulation, no hidden forms and no cloaking. These behaviors lower the likelihood of active credential harvesting during the observed sessions. They do not outweigh the independent threat listings, because deceptive content can be switched on after a sandbox visit.
- Homepage: the browser title reads "OpenSea.io" while the site is served from an unrelated hosting subdomain, so the brand claim is not backed by the domain.
- Browser safety check: the homepage is flagged as a social-engineering threat.
- Multi-engine reputation scan: 17 engines rate the domain malicious, including 3 tier-one security vendors.
- Sandbox sessions: 3 of 3 completed with zero external network calls and no wallet, clipboard or hidden-form activity, but with 18 console errors on the page.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The analysis did not capture any legal, terms or licensing pages that identify an operating company, a registration number or a financial regulator. The page's disclosure position could not be established, so the evidence gives no basis for treating the site as a regulated or licensed service. This is a verification gap rather than an additional accusation, and the threat findings stand independently. A search of the third-party broker reputation dataset returned no match for the site, so there is no broker-level reputational signal either way. The site's transport encryption is a valid, domain-validated certificate. That confirms an encrypted connection and nothing about who runs the site.
- Homepage: no company name, licence or regulator reference was identified in the captured content.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US), a major commercial cloud provider, which says nothing about the operator.
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WR1 (DV), valid to 2026-11-27, with 32 days remaining at the time of analysis.
- Third-party broker dataset: no match, which is neutral and not a regulatory verdict.
What to Verify Next
Any dealings that were intended with the brand named in the page title should be restarted from that brand's official domain, entered manually or taken from a source known to be genuine, not from this address. If the page was reached through a link, message or advertisement, the sender should be asked through an independent channel whether they actually sent it. Official support channels of the brand should be consulted if the page requested a wallet connection, seed phrase, login or payment. Anyone who already interacted with the page should review recent account and wallet approvals and revoke any that are unrecognized.
- Homepage: the page title claims a brand identity that the hosting domain does not substantiate.
- Browser safety check: the flagged threat category (social engineering) points to credential or approval theft as the relevant exposure.
- Sandbox sessions: no wallet-connect behavior was observed, so any approval prompt a user encounters elsewhere cannot be attributed to these sessions.
Summary Verdict
The site sits in a clearly elevated-risk posture. Confirmed blacklist listings from independent sources outweigh the technically sound and quiet behavior observed in the sandbox. Identity is unverified, and the borrowed-brand title makes the page more suspect, not less.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site sits behind a trusted CDN/WAF layer. All six observed addresses are edge servers, and no origin address was visible. This is a mitigating factor only: it indicates mainstream, professionally operated delivery. It also prevents independent verification of the hosting and can mask rapid content swaps. Protective infrastructure cannot offset the reputation risk raised by the threat detections.
Closing Assessment
The site should be treated as unsafe for any login, credential entry, wallet connection or financial interaction, and nothing should be downloaded from it. At most, passive read-only viewing from an isolated, non-privileged browser session is tolerable, and bookmarking, sharing or linking to the page should be avoided. Report the page to the impersonated brand and to the hosting platform if it reached anyone through an unsolicited message.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-25 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, registration and ownership, behaviour in a sandbox.
01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
02 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete.Registration and ownership
rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE
03 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH
Signals weighed against the site
- AbuseIPDB: 82 reports on hosting IP 64.29.17.131 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.
Identity verification
| Status | UNKNOWN |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |
- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of mintest-phi.vercel.app.
- The request stayed on mintest-phi.vercel.app. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 64.29.17.131 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected |
| Resolved IP addresses | 6 |
| Edge IP addresses | 6 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WR1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-11-27 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 17 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 82 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 1 match |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about mintest-phi.vercel.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.