Is orcaclaim.live a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

Security Alert

Fortinet, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a minimal single-page property whose title reads "Orca — Claim $Dolphin". It presents a short token-claim call to action built around a named token, $Dolphin, with very little supporting text. Its apparent purpose is to steer visitors toward claiming a crypto-asset reward or airdrop, a business model commonly used to solicit wallet interaction or credentials.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

Multiple independent security sources currently flag this domain as malicious, including two major security vendors, and a confirmed blacklist-level detection is active. This is the decisive factor in the assessment. The protective signals present (a valid certificate, an identified network, and no observed external data exfiltration during sandbox runs) do not offset it. The homepage framing is a "claim" prompt tied to a newly named token, which is a pattern widely used in token-claim lures and wallet-draining campaigns. The sandbox did not observe wallet-connection prompts, clipboard tampering, hidden forms, or cloaking, so the available behavioral evidence does not show the page actively executing such techniques. The page is also very thin, and the content-level analysis could not confirm the site's identity, so the reputational detections carry the weight. No conflicting legal identities or confirmed brand impersonation were observed. The risk therefore rests on the threat-intelligence detections and on the domain's extreme youth. Its registration is very recent, and that pairs poorly with a claim-style offer. Evidence:

• Homepage: the title promotes claiming "$Dolphin" under an "Orca" name, and the page carries only a few hundred characters of text.
• Reputation: independent security engines, including two top-tier vendors, flag the domain as malicious, and an external blacklist condition is confirmed.
• Domain provenance: registered 2026-08-13, about 0.21 years (roughly 75 days) old.
• Sandbox: three successful runs recorded no external requests, no wallet-provider activity, and no cloaking, but did record repeated console errors on the page.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The homepage identifies no operating company, jurisdiction, licence, registration number, or legal terms, so there is nothing to test against a regulator or corporate registry. For a site inviting token claims, this is a material disclosure gap, and it compounds the reputational concerns above. The domain registration record shows incomplete owner details, which is a case of ownership opacity rather than an identity contradiction. No third-party broker or regulatory-database entry matched this site, and none is claimed. Real-world identity of the operator therefore remains unestablished. Evidence:

• Homepage: no company name, licence, registration number, or legal pages were presented.
• Registration: domain registered through Dynadot Inc, with expiry set to 2027-08-13 and owner details incomplete.
• Transport: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV, domain validation only, so it attests no organisational identity), valid to 2027-01-09.
• Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).

What to Verify Next

Any claim that this project is connected to a known "Orca" brand or to the $Dolphin token should be tested against the official channels of that project, reached through an independently sourced route rather than through links on this site. The token's contract details and any published team or audit information should be confirmed on neutral, independent sources before any claim is attempted. If the site is encountered through a message, advertisement, or social post, the originating account's authenticity and age should be checked. Official support and contact channels should be confirmed through an independent route. Lastly, the domain's detection status should be rechecked later, since new domains are often reclassified quickly. Evidence:

• Homepage: the claim prompt names a token but presents no contract address, team, or documentation.
• Domain history: registered only about 75 days ago (2026-08-13), leaving no long track record to rely on.
• Reputation: current malicious detections from security vendors are the baseline against which any later recheck should be compared.

Summary Verdict

The overall posture is high risk. Active malicious detections from independent sources, together with a very recent domain and no establishing identity, outweigh the otherwise unremarkable technical hygiene. The evidence is not consistent with a legitimate, established service.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN/WAF, and all observed addresses are edge servers, so the origin host is not visible. This is a mitigating factor only. It shows the domain is not served from obviously abusive hosting, but it does not establish legitimacy. It also prevents independent confirmation of the actual host, and edge-only visibility can mask rapid content changes.

Closing Assessment

The site should be treated as unsafe for any sensitive interaction. Wallets should not be connected, credentials or seed phrases should not be entered, no payment or token approval should be made, and nothing should be downloaded. Anyone who has already interacted with it should revoke any token approvals and secure the affected accounts.