Is osbot.net safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 40/100

osbot.net
Download PDF Check another site How we score

Verdict

Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.

40 OUT OF 100
Low Trust

osbot.net is low-trust and potentially risky.

Sensitive Interaction Risk Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-09 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

What this site appears to beOSBot is a downloadable automation client for Old School RuneScape offering free scripts and premium tools. The page focuses on product features: performance, security, stability, cross-platform downloads, and a developer API.

Evidence status and limitations

Evidence completeness: Not recorded

  • The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
  • Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

Malware engines3 flagged itVirusTotalRisk
Google Safe BrowsingNot listedGoogleClear
Abuse reports on the host0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reportsClear
Domain age3 months oldMost scam domains are under a year oldRisk
Web archiveArchived since 2002348 snapshotsClear
CertificateEncrypted connectionIssued by YE2Noted

The page as captured

https://osbot.net/
Screenshot of the osbot.net homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment
What osbot.net served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-09. The page may look different now.

Key findings

  • Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
  • Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
  • Public web-archive history exists since 2002.
  • At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

Full analysis

Security Alert

Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

OSBot is a software-download website presenting an automation client for Old School RuneScape, with free scripts, premium tools, cross-platform downloads, and a developer API. Its apparent business model is freemium software monetization through premium subscriptions or paid upgrades for users seeking broader automation capability.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

The site presents a clear software product and does not show an apparent brand-impersonation pattern, conflicting legal identities, or a phishing form in the supplied page evidence. However, the website is subject to a confirmed blacklist finding and multiple external malicious or suspicious detections, including a high-confidence threat signal from an external security provider. This is a material contradiction to the otherwise coherent product presentation and is the principal reason the site should be treated as unsuitable for sensitive interaction. The available evidence does not establish whether the detections relate to the operator, the downloadable software, or compromised infrastructure, so attribution remains limited; the operational risk remains significant regardless.

Evidence
  • External reputation assessment recorded multiple malicious detections and one suspicious detection, with a Tier-1 threat signal present.
  • The site was recorded on external blacklist sources.
  • The homepage describes OSBot as an automation client for Old School RuneScape and offers a download pathway, but the supplied behavioral evidence found no hidden forms, password-external forms, wallet activity, or cloaking.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The homepage footer identifies “Meire & Brito Automation BV,” but the available evidence does not independently verify that entity’s relationship to the domain or software. The site is a gaming-automation product rather than an evidently regulated financial service, and no licensing claim or license number is presented in the supplied content; this is a transparency point for identity and contractual due diligence, not by itself evidence of fraud. The product’s stated use for casual automation and “goldfarming” may also create account-enforcement or platform-terms exposure for users, although that is distinct from the confirmed external security findings. Historical records show substantial prior domain activity, while the current registration record is materially more recent; the historical record therefore provides provenance context but does not independently validate the present operator.

Evidence
  • The homepage footer names Meire & Brito Automation BV, while independent identity verification is recorded as unverified.
  • WHOIS records show registration on 2026-07-15, with an age of 0.24 years and expiry on 2027-07-15.
  • Historical records contain 348 snapshots spanning 2002–2026, covering 25 tracked years.

What to Verify Next

Before any download, installation, account sign-in, or payment, an enterprise or individual user should obtain the software through an independently validated channel and compare its publisher, hash, signing certificate, and requested permissions against the operator’s formally confirmed identity. The named company should be verified through an authoritative corporate registry and through an independently sourced contact route rather than relying solely on the website. Any use should also be assessed against Old School RuneScape’s applicable terms and the organization’s software-installation controls.

Evidence
  • The homepage offers Windows, macOS, and Linux downloads and states that Java is required.
  • The homepage includes a “Sign In” pathway but no visible login form was observed in the supplied capture.
  • Behavioral testing recorded three successful runs, with no wallet connection, clipboard hijacking, hidden forms, or password submissions detected.

Summary Verdict

The overall posture is low trust with elevated sensitive-interaction risk. The site’s coherent software presentation and historical web presence do not offset the confirmed blacklist status and multiple external malicious detections, while the operator’s identity remains unverified. Normal browsing may be possible, but the available evidence does not support treating downloads, credentials, or other sensitive interactions as trusted.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site is protected by Cloudflare CDN/WAF infrastructure, with observed Cloudflare edge addresses and additional potential origin candidates. The underlying hosting is associated with AS-HOSTINGER, Hostinger International Limited, in Ukraine; this infrastructure provides some exposure mitigation but is not evidence that the operator or downloadable software is legitimate.

Evidence
  • Hosting is identified as AS47583, AS-HOSTINGER — Hostinger International Limited, CY; observed server IP: 92.113.16.170, country UA.
  • Cloudflare edge addresses observed include 104.21.12.194, 172.67.153.55, 2606:4700:3031::ac43:9937, and 2606:4700:3034::6815:cc2.
  • Transport encryption uses a DV TLS certificate issued by YE2, valid to 2026-12-12.

Closing Assessment

The proportionate course is to avoid downloading or installing the client and to suspend credential or payment activity until the operator, software provenance, and external detections have been independently resolved.

Written analysis generated 2026-10-09 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.

What the analysis found

5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, hosting and network, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

01 Governance

  • What the site offers, as described on its own pages, limits how high the score can go until more of it can be verified.Governance rule:gov_business_model_cap

02 External reputation

  • Several malware engines flagged this domain.External reputation rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH

03 Hosting and network

  • The domain is young and has almost nothing else set up around it.Hosting and network rule:DNS_SPARSE_YOUNG_DOMAIN
  • Several separate hosting and network checks came back negative.Hosting and network rule:DNS_MULTIPLE_NEGATIVE_SIGNALS

04 Behaviour in a sandbox

  • The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise.Behaviour in a sandbox rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS

05 Registration and ownership

  • The public registration record for this domain is incomplete.Registration and ownership rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE

Identity verification

StatusUNVERIFIED
Identity score30/100
Identity verification confidence50%
  • No on-site identity signals detected

Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.

What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of osbot.net.

  • The request stayed on osbot.net. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
  • Registration is published under Ultahost, Inc.. Clear
  • DNS for this domain is served by dns-parking.com, across 2 name servers. Noted
  • The registration is paid up to 2027-07-15. Noted
  • The earliest public archive of this site is from 2002-07-26. Clear
  • It is hosted on AS-HOSTINGER, from a server in UA. Noted

Domain intelligence

RegistrarUltahost, Inc.
HostingAS-HOSTINGER - Hostinger International Limited, CY
CountryUA
Server IP2a02:4780:44:1691:79db:bae2:50c:5522
Name serversAPOLLO.DNS-PARKING.COM, ATHENA.DNS-PARKING.COM
CDN / edge networkDetected (cloudflare)
Resolved IP addresses8
Edge IP addresses4
Likely origin IP addresses4
SSL issuerYE2
SSL expiry2026-12-12
Domain age0.24 years (continuous registration)
Domain expiry2027-07-15
Archive first seen2002-07-26
Archive snapshots348
ReputationVirusTotal: 3 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches

About this assessment

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about osbot.net at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

Already paid or signed in? Do this now

Act fast. The sooner your bank knows, the better the chance of stopping the payment.

  1. Call your bank or card company now. Use the number on the back of your card. Ask them to stop or reverse the payment.
  2. Paid with crypto? Contact the exchange or wallet app you sent it from today. Give them the address you paid.
  3. Signed in or shared a password? Change it now, on every site where you use it, and turn on two-step sign-in.
  4. Report it to the police. In the US you can also report at reportfraud.ftc.gov and ic3.gov. In other countries, use your national police or fraud reporting service.
  5. Keep the evidence. Save screenshots, receipts, emails and chat messages. Your bank and the police will ask for them.
  6. Ignore anyone who offers to get your money back for a fee. These "recovery" offers are often a second scam.

Looking for the real site? Type the company name into a search engine yourself, or use the web address printed on your card, bill or letter. Do not use links from messages or ads.

Common questions about osbot.net

Is osbot.net a scam?

TrustSniffer found several risk patterns on osbot.net. It scored 40 out of 100 on 2026-10-09, a low-trust result. That is not proof of fraud: it means the evidence did not support treating the site as safe.

Is osbot.net safe to use?

Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.

What is the trust score of osbot.net?

osbot.net scored 40 out of 100 on 2026-10-09, which places it in the low-trust band. The score is built from the domain's age and registration history, its hosting and certificate, the content of the site itself, and third-party reputation data. There is no human rating and no user review in it.

Download this report as PDF Free, no account needed. Create one to keep a history of the sites you check.
By AminRez, Founder & Lead Security Researcher, TrustSniffer
Produced by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine · assessed 2026-10-09 · how we assess · report a mistake