Verdict
oxigenospa.com shows high-risk / scam indicators.
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
| What this site appears to be | Simple maintenance notice: site temporarily unavailable for scheduled maintenance. No forms, links, or monetization visible. |
|---|
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: UNKNOWN
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 14 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0 reportsAbuseIPDB; shared hosting inflates this count | Noted |
| Domain age | 17 years oldRegistered history | Clear |
| Web archive | Archived since 2010Public history exists | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by YE2 | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: more than 10 years (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2010.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
This website is a currently unavailable informational web presence for oxigenospa.com, presenting only a brief scheduled-maintenance notice and no visible service, transaction, login, or monetization workflow.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
The site’s current page is operationally passive and shows no login form, payment request, credential collection, or active user interaction. However, this limited benign presentation is outweighed by confirmed external threat findings: multiple security providers, including Kaspersky and Sophos, identified malicious characteristics, and the domain is listed by external blacklist sources. These are direct contradictions to a safe-interaction posture, even though no page-level brand impersonation or phishing form was observed. The site’s apparent operator identity also remains unverified, so the registration record should not be treated as proof of control.
- External reputation evaluation recorded 14 malicious and 1 suspicious detections across 20 evaluated results; Kaspersky and Sophos were among the flagged providers.
- The external reputation evaluation recorded `external_blacklist: true`; Google Safe Browsing reported `gsb_malicious: false`.
- The homepage returned a maintenance notice with no forms, links, or monetization visible.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The available page does not identify a regulated service, license, registration number, or applicable supervisory authority. Because the site is displaying only a maintenance notice, the legal and business disclosures needed to determine whether any authorization is required are not currently available; this is a verification gap rather than independent proof of misconduct. The registration record names Cabrera Hugo Damian as registrant, but the available evidence does not independently connect that person to the website’s operating entity. No broker match was identified in the supplied third-party contextual dataset.
- Domain registration record: created 2010-02-22T22:21:45Z, age 16.5 years, expires 2027-02-22T22:21:45Z; registrar: dattatec.com SRL.
- Hosted on AS47583, AS-HOSTINGER — Hostinger International Limited, CY; resolved server country: UA.
- TLS certificate is DV, issued by YE2, valid through 2026-10-14T20:10:42+00:00.
What to Verify Next
Before any account, credential, payment, download, or other sensitive interaction is considered, an independent registry search should establish the responsible legal entity and determine whether the proposed service requires authorization. Official contact channels and the site’s current operating status should be confirmed through an independently sourced route rather than relying solely on the website. Any future return of the site should be reassessed for changes in content, forms, redirects, downloads, and business claims.
- Independent registry confirmation of the responsible operator and any applicable authorization is required because the available page does not provide sufficient regulatory context.
- A separate technical reassessment is warranted if the site returns from maintenance or introduces interactive functionality.
Summary Verdict
The overall posture is critical sensitive-interaction risk. The passive maintenance page does not offset the confirmed external malicious detections and blacklist status, while the real-world operator remains unverified. Sensitive engagement is not supported by the available evidence.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site resolves directly through Hostinger infrastructure on AS47583, with four resolved IP addresses and no CDN edge IPs identified; the infrastructure analysis indicates likely origin-address exposure. Transport encryption is present, but the certificate is domain-validated only, and hosting protection does not mitigate the external reputation findings.
Closing Assessment
Until independent identity, authorization, and threat-status checks produce materially different evidence, activity should remain limited to passive observation, with authentication, credential submission, downloads, and financial interaction avoided.
Written analysis generated 2026-08-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
1 finding contributed to this verdict, raised by analysis engine, external reputation.
01 Sensitive Interaction Risk
- The analysis matched a pattern TrustSniffer treats as a direct threat to a visitor.Analysis engine
signal:direct_threat - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
Identity verification
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |
- No on-site identity signals detected
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of oxigenospa.com.
- The request stayed on oxigenospa.com. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- Registration is published under dattatec.com SRL. Clear
- DNS for this domain is served by dns-parking.com, across 2 name servers. Noted
- The registration is paid up to 2027-02-22. Noted
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2010-10-19. Clear
- It is hosted on AS-HOSTINGER, from a server in UA. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | dattatec.com SRL |
|---|---|
| Hosting | AS-HOSTINGER - Hostinger International Limited, CY |
| Country | UA |
| Server IP | 2a02:4780:43:961e:a3b7:6be:24e4:7645 |
| Name servers | ASTER.DNS-PARKING.COM, HELIOS.DNS-PARKING.COM |
| SSL issuer | YE2 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-10-14 |
| Domain age | 16.50 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-02-22 |
| Archive first seen | 2010-10-19 |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 14 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about oxigenospa.com at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.