Verdict
Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.
portal-moonshot-0ld.netlify.app is low-trust and potentially risky.
| What this site appears to be | The captured page is Netlify's default 'Site not found' 404 response, indicating the requested path or site is not deployed on Netlify. It contains no service description, forms, links, or commercial content, so the site's purpose cannot be determined from this capture. |
|---|
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 6 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 1% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 4 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | Not availableNo registration record was returned | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 | Noted |
| Hosted by | AMAZON-02Server in US | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
- The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
This website is a subdomain on a public application-hosting platform. Its captured homepage is the platform's default "Site not found" error response, which says the requested path does not exist on that service. It shows no products, pricing, forms, links, or company description, so no business model or service can be identified from what the site presents.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
The risk assessment is elevated, and it rests on external threat intelligence and behaviour rather than on anything the page says. Several independent security engines currently flag the site as malicious. Two of them rank among the most widely relied-upon tier-one engines. Together with the external blacklist listing, this is a confirmed blacklisting and the decisive factor in the assessment. A page analysis also noted that the hostname closely resembles the hosting platform's own brand. That is a lookalike indicator, and no impersonation was confirmed. Other contradiction categories were not observed: no phishing verdict from the major browser-safety service, no conflicting legal identities, and no on-page fraud claims. The sandbox observations do not fit a static error page. Across all three runs it detected hidden forms, and it recorded password-field forms even though the visible page has no inputs. The page's content also changed on a very large scale after interaction. A dormant 404 shell should not behave this way. It points to content that is served conditionally, or to a template that may later be swapped for a credential-collection page. Abuse reports exist against one of the shared edge addresses in front of the site. They are attributed to shared provider infrastructure, so they say little about this site's operator. Evidence:
- Homepage: the captured response is the hosting platform's default 404 page, with 368 characters of text, no forms, no links and no metadata.
- Homepage behaviour: hidden forms were detected in 3 of 3 sandbox runs. Password-field forms were also recorded, and about 4,130 DOM mutations followed interaction.
- Reputation: 6 malicious and 1 suspicious detections from security engines, with 2 tier-one vendors among them. The external blacklist flag is also set.
- Network layer: 4 abuse reports on a shared CDN edge address, attributed to shared infrastructure and not to this site specifically.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The site makes no licensing, registration, or regulated-activity claims. The captured page has no legal, terms, privacy, or about content, so there is nothing on it to assess. Real-world operator identity remains unverified. No third-party broker or regulatory listing matched the site, which means there is neither a reputational warning nor a corroborating source of identity. The transport-layer facts are consistent with ordinary platform hosting. They do not offset the threat-intelligence listing and do not establish who operates the site. Evidence:
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US), with the address registered under ARIN.
- Transport encryption: the TLS certificate is OV-validated and issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 to Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19. It therefore identifies the hosting platform, not the site's operator.
- Homepage: no company name, licence number, or regulator reference appears anywhere in the capture.
What to Verify Next
The site's current content should be confirmed directly from a controlled, isolated environment, because the observed hidden-form and DOM-change behaviour suggests it may serve different content from the one captured. Anyone who received this address in an email, message, or advertisement should confirm the intended destination through an independent, offline channel with the supposed sender. They should not rely on the link as received. If the site claims to represent a business, that business's official domain should be obtained from a trusted source and compared with this hostname. Official support and contact channels should also be confirmed through that route. The site's owner, if known, should be asked whether the deployment is intended and whether it was compromised or abandoned. Evidence:
- Homepage: the captured content is a generic platform error, so it gives no basis for identifying the intended business.
- Behavioural capture: hidden forms and heavy post-interaction DOM changes were seen across all three sandbox runs.
- Reputation: the current external detections would need to be re-checked after any remediation or content change.
Summary Verdict
The overall posture is low trust with elevated risk. Confirmed external threat listings and anomalous hidden-form behaviour outweigh the technically sound transport security. Identity remains unverified, so this website cannot be regarded as legitimate on the available evidence.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site sits behind AWS-based CDN edge infrastructure. All four observed addresses are edge nodes, and the origin server was not observable. The edge infrastructure and the valid certificate lower the likelihood of simple spoofing or interception, but they are only a mitigating factor. They do not offset the reputation risk. Edge-only visibility also means the hosting cannot be independently checked and content could be swapped without notice.
Closing Assessment
Interaction should be limited to read-only viewing from an isolated environment, if the site is visited at all. No logins, credentials, downloads, or financial or wallet actions should be attempted until the external detections are cleared and the operator is independently confirmed.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-21 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, page content.
01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS - The page replaced a large part of its own content after loading.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_DOM_CHANGE_HIGH - The page rewrote itself after it was interacted with, so what a visitor first sees is not what they end up on.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_DOM_DIFF_AFTER_INTERACTION
03 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to.Page content
rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED
Signals weighed against the site
- AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 1% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.
Identity verification
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |
- No on-site identity signals detected
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of portal-moonshot-0ld.netlify.app.
- The request stayed on portal-moonshot-0ld.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 6 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 1% confidence, 4 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about portal-moonshot-0ld.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.