Is portal-moonshot-aof.netlify.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

Security Alert

Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

The analysed website is a subdomain on a public site-hosting platform, apparently intended as a "portal". At the time of analysis its homepage served only the platform's default "Site not found" error screen. That screen says the requested path does not exist and invites visitors to build and deploy their own site. The page shows no products, services, pricing or operator identity. Its business model and purpose cannot be determined from the content, and it appears to be an unpublished, removed or misrouted deployment rather than an operating business.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

The evidence contains confirmed contradictory signals, so this assessment is cautionary. Several independent threat-intelligence engines currently flag the domain as malicious, including a major endpoint-security vendor. This amounts to a confirmed blacklisting, and it is the decisive factor. It conflicts with what the page shows, because a static hosting error screen would not normally attract such detections. Automated browsing runs also recorded behaviour the visible page does not explain. In every run, hidden forms were present, including password-type form fields. The page's structure also changed heavily after interaction, well beyond what a plain 404 notice would produce. The page's visible text mentions no login or data-collection function, so these hidden elements are unexplained. They could belong to a credential-harvesting template that is dormant, swapped out or conditionally displayed. The analysis cannot confirm that. The domain name closely resembles the hosting platform's own name, which raised a brand-similarity flag. No brand impersonation, phishing page or conflicting legal identities were confirmed. The harm indicated is the active threat listing and the concealed form behaviour, not a proven fraud scheme. Evidence:

• Homepage: multiple independent engines classify the domain as malicious (5 malicious detections, including one top-tier endpoint-security vendor).
• Homepage behaviour: hidden forms detected in 3 of 3 sandbox runs, with 3 password-type form instances recorded, although the visible page lists no forms.
• Homepage behaviour: 4,130 DOM mutations after interaction, which is inconsistent with a static error notice.
• Domain naming: a brand-similarity flag against the hosting platform's name, treated as a soft indicator rather than a confirmed impersonation.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The site claims no license, registration number or regulatory status, and it presents no legal, about, terms or privacy pages. The homepage names no operating entity. The real-world operator therefore remains unverified, and no on-site identity claim can be relied on. No third-party broker or regulatory record matched this domain, so there is no external reputational signal on regulated status in either direction. Where a TLS certificate is present, it identifies the hosting platform as the certificate subject, not the operator of this subdomain. It evidences only the platform's own identity and encrypted transport. It does not establish who controls this deployment, and it does not offset the active threat listing. Evidence:

• Hosting provenance: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).
• Transport security: TLS certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 (OV), subject organisation Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19.
• Homepage: no license, authority, registration number or company name is claimed or displayed.
• Third-party registry context: no broker-database match for this domain.

What to Verify Next

The first step is to establish through an independent, offline or known-good channel why this address was supplied, and whether the party that shared it actually controls it. The link's sender should be asked to confirm the official web address through a separately sourced contact route. The expected counterparty should also be checked for official channels and, where relevant, licensing status in the registry of the claimed jurisdiction. Any later content that appears at this address should be treated as new and unverified, and it should be re-assessed before any form is completed. A hosting-platform deployment label alone should not be accepted as proof of identity. Evidence:

• Homepage: the only text is a hosting-provider notice with a "Start building" call to action; no contact details are published.
• Site structure: no internal or external links, and no social-media presence, were found to cross-check the operator.
• Page metadata: no title, description or structured data identifies a brand or owner.

Summary Verdict

The posture is clearly cautionary. Confirmed external threat listings and concealed form behaviour outweigh the benign appearance of the visible page. The operator's identity is unverified, and no content on the site supports a legitimate purpose. The site is classed as high-risk for any sensitive interaction.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind Amazon-operated edge infrastructure used by the hosting platform. All observed addresses are CDN edge servers, and the origin was not observable. This is a mitigating factor only, because shared edge hosting says nothing about who controls the deployment, and it cannot offset the threat listings. The two abuse reports on one shared edge address are discounted. They relate to common provider infrastructure used by many tenants, not specifically to this domain. The edge-only visibility also means content on this subdomain could be changed quickly without any change in hosting signals.

Closing Assessment

The site should be used in read-only fashion at most. No credentials, payment details or personal data should be entered, and no files should be downloaded from it. If the link arrived unsolicited, it should be reported to the sender's organisation and its own security or abuse contact.

Signals weighed against the site

• AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.