Verdict
Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.
portal-moonshot-phx.netlify.app is low-trust and potentially risky.
| What this site appears to be | Netlify default 'Site not found' 404 page stating that the requested path or site does not exist on Netlify. The page has no content, forms, claims, or monetization to assess. |
|---|
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 6 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | Not availableNo registration record was returned | Noted |
| Web archive | Archived since 20261 snapshot | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
- The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
This is a bare hosting-platform error page, not a functioning website. The address is a tenant subdomain on Netlify's shared hosting service, and it shows only the platform's default "Site not found" 404 message with a "Build and deploy your own site for free" prompt. The page has no products, services, forms, claims, contact details or monetization, so its business purpose cannot be determined from what it presents to a visitor.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
The evidence converges on a materially elevated risk despite the empty page. A tier-one security vendor and several other reputation engines classify the address as malicious, and an external listing is active, so the address is blacklisted on third-party reputation sources. The only abuse reports found attach to a shared edge address belonging to the hosting provider, not to this tenant. They carry no weight on their own and are discounted, so the blacklisting rests on the malicious classifications. The address itself is a generic tenant name on the shared platform. Automated lookalike checks flagged similarity to the platform's own domain, but no impersonation of a specific brand was confirmed and no conflicting legal identities exist. The sandbox runs behaved differently from what the placeholder suggests. Hidden forms appeared in every run, password-type fields were detected, and the page structure mutated heavily after interaction. Final-destination behavior was also marked suspicious. A 404 page that nonetheless carries concealed input forms and large post-load changes is consistent with content being swapped in or staged, and the benign placeholder cannot be assumed to be what a visitor would later receive. External-request volume was heavy, but none of it went to non-whitelisted destinations, and no wallet, clipboard or fingerprinting activity was seen. Evidence:
- Homepage: renders only the default hosting-platform 404 message, with no business content, no visible forms and no contact artifacts.
- Sandbox behavior: hidden forms were detected in all three runs, with password-type fields present and about 4,130 DOM mutations after interaction.
- External reputation: multiple malicious classifications, including one from a tier-one vendor, and an active external blacklist listing.
- Abuse reports: low-confidence reports tied to a shared hosting-provider edge IP, discounted as shared infrastructure.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The page contains no legal entity name, terms, privacy policy, licensing statement or registration number, because it is a platform placeholder with no operator disclosures. The operator therefore cannot be independently connected to any real-world business or person, and the site claims no regulated status. No third-party broker or regulatory-database record matched this address, which means there is no reputational context from that source either way. Transport security is present and well-formed, but a valid certificate on a shared hosting platform reflects the platform's provisioning and says nothing about the tenant's legitimacy or intent. Evidence:
- Homepage: no company name, licence, registration number or operator contact is disclosed.
- Transport encryption: OV-level TLS certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 to the subject Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19. The certificate belongs to the hosting platform, not an independent operator.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).
What to Verify Next
Any party being asked to interact with this address should first establish who controls it and why it is being offered. The sender should identify the real organization behind it through an independent channel such as a known official website, a published phone number or an established business relationship, and not through anything in the link or message that supplied it. If a specific service is promised, the legitimate operator should be asked to confirm the exact official address in writing. The official support or contact channels should also be confirmed through an offline route. Because the content can change after capture, the address should be re-examined only in an isolated environment, and security teams should consider reporting it to the hosting platform's abuse process. Evidence:
- Homepage: shows no operator, product or service that could be matched to a known organization.
- Sandbox behavior: concealed forms and post-interaction DOM changes mean the final content is not stable between a first look and later use.
- External reputation: the active malicious classifications are the reason independent confirmation is needed before engagement.
Summary Verdict
The address warrants a clearly cautionary, high-risk posture. Confirmed adverse reputation from several security sources, combined with concealed input behavior that contradicts the innocuous placeholder, outweighs the neutral appearance of the page and any technical hygiene. The operator's real-world identity remains unestablished, and nothing in the evidence supports treating the address as legitimate.
Infrastructure Integrity
The address resolves to Amazon-hosted cloud infrastructure behind the Netlify platform's content-delivery layer, and all observed addresses are shared edge nodes, with no origin server visible. Established, trusted infrastructure and a valid certificate are mitigating factors only. They cannot offset the reputation findings, and because only the edge is observable, the underlying hosting cannot be independently checked and content could be swapped without a visible infrastructure change.
Closing Assessment
Account logins, credential entry, payments and any financial interaction through this address should be avoided. Any contact with it should be limited to isolated, non-sensitive inspection by security personnel, and nothing should be downloaded or submitted until the operator is independently identified and the adverse detections are cleared.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, page content.
01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS - The page replaced a large part of its own content after loading.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_DOM_CHANGE_HIGH
03 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to.Page content
rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED
Signals weighed against the site
- AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.
Identity verification
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |
- No on-site identity signals detected
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of portal-moonshot-phx.netlify.app.
- The request stayed on portal-moonshot-phx.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-07. Clear
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2026-10-07 |
| Archive snapshots | 1 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 6 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about portal-moonshot-phx.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.