Verdict
Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.
portal-moonshot-swa.netlify.app is low-trust and potentially risky.
| What this site appears to be | A Netlify 'Site not found' 404 placeholder for a domain with no deployed site. It offers no service, claims, forms, or links to assess. |
|---|
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 3 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 1% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 4 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | 15 days oldMost scam domains are under a year old | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 20261 snapshot | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
The site is a subdomain on a public web-hosting platform that currently serves only the platform's default "Site not found" error page, with no deployed content. Its address suggests a customer portal for a service called "moonshot". The page offers no products, pricing, forms, claims or outbound links, so it has no observable business model or stated purpose.
Scam/Impersonation Risk: The site's reputation signals contradict its blank appearance, and the assessment is cautionary. Multiple security vendors flag the domain as malicious, including a tier-one vendor, and these detections place it on a confirmed blacklist. That is the decisive negative finding. The blank page does not offset it, because a throwaway or staged address can look empty and later be filled with credential-harvesting content.
Regulatory Verification Notes: The page names no operator, company, licence, registration number or contact route, so nothing on the site can be tested against a registry. This is a disclosure gap, not proof of a scam, but together with the unverified identity and the ownership opacity it leaves no basis for treating the site as a genuine business. No third-party broker or regulator record was matched, and the absence of one is neutral. The valid certificate and recognised issuer show only that the platform provisioned encryption. They do not indicate who runs the site.
What to Verify Next: Do not enter credentials or payment details here. If a message, advertisement or message thread directed a person to this address, they should confirm the sender's identity through an independent, offline route and obtain the service's official address from a source known to be genuine. An organisation that expects this "moonshot" portal to exist should ask its own provider or business contact whether the address is legitimate. A security team should block or monitor the domain and review any records of earlier visits to it. The address should be re-examined only if real content is deployed, and any later content that asks for sign-in should be treated as hostile until the operator is independently identified.
Summary Verdict: The overall posture is clearly cautionary, with the assessment resting on confirmed threat-intelligence detections and on forms present in the page that are not visible to users. The site's blank appearance and its valid encryption certificate do not offset those detections. The operator's real-world identity remains unverified, and no basis was found to treat the domain as legitimate.
Infrastructure Integrity: The site is delivered through Amazon's CDN/WAF layer, and all four observed addresses are edge servers. No origin server address was observable. This protection is a mitigating factor only and does not offset the reputation risk. Because only the edge is visible, the hosting setup cannot be independently verified, and content can be swapped quickly behind it.
Closing Assessment: Treat this address as unsafe for sign-in, credential entry or any financial interaction, and limit any contact with it to passive, read-only inspection by security staff.
- Brand similarity: The address closely resembles the hosting platform's own name, and the page analysis flagged this as a suspected brand lookalike. No confirmed impersonation was established, but the pairing of a "portal" naming pattern with a lookalike element is a recognised lure structure.
- Hidden forms: In every behavioral test run, the browser sandbox detected hidden forms and password-type form fields. The visible page shows no forms at all, so this mismatch between what is rendered and what is present in the page structure is a material concern. The page also underwent very heavy structural change after interaction, and the network pattern was flagged as fast-flux-like.
- Abuse reports: A small number of abuse reports exist against one of the shared edge addresses serving the site. Because that address is shared provider infrastructure, those reports may reflect other tenants and are weaker evidence than the direct detections.
- Other contradictions: No conflicting legal identities were observed, and no phishing verdict from a major browser-safety service was recorded.
- Homepage: shows only a platform 404 "Site not found" message with a platform-internal reference ID. The page has no visible forms, services or links.
- Sandbox behavior across three runs: hidden forms and password fields were present on every run, and about four thousand DOM mutations followed interaction. Network activity was otherwise benign.
- Domain provenance: the domain was registered in 2026 (about 15 days old), with 1 archive snapshot spanning 2026 (1 year tracked).
- External reputation: multiple threat-intelligence detections, including one from a tier-one security vendor, and 4 abuse reports against a shared edge IP.
- Homepage: no company name, licence, address or support channel is disclosed.
- Transport encryption: the TLS certificate is an OV certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 to the hosting platform's operating organisation, valid to 2027-03-19.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).
- No broker-database match was found for the domain name.
- Homepage: the "Site not found" state means no legitimate service can currently be confirmed at this address.
- Sandbox: the hidden password-type forms are the capability that would be used for credential collection.
- Domain provenance: the domain's very recent registration leaves no track record to rely on.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-19 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network, history in the web archive, page content.
01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH
02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS
03 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D
04 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new.History in the web archive
rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE
05 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to.Page content
rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED
Signals weighed against the site
- AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 1% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.
Identity verification
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |
- No on-site identity signals detected
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of portal-moonshot-swa.netlify.app.
- The request stayed on portal-moonshot-swa.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-04. Clear
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | 0.04 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2026-10-04 |
| Archive snapshots | 1 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 3 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 1% confidence, 4 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about portal-moonshot-swa.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.