Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
pump-voting-g5.netlify.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.
| What this site appears to be | Netlify-hosted 404 'Site not found' page indicating a broken link or missing site build. No forms, no solicitations, no financial or credential requests. |
|---|
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 1 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | Not availableNo registration record was returned | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
- The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person.
Full analysis
Overview
The website is an unconfigured Netlify-hosted subdomain whose hostname suggests a voting-themed destination. The only content visible to a visitor is a generic "Site not found" error page saying the link is broken or the site does not exist on Netlify, with a prompt to "Start building" and a support-guide pointer. It shows no products, pricing, forms or stated business model, so its apparent purpose is a placeholder or an abandoned deployment. Independent threat-intelligence data nonetheless points to active malicious use of the domain.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
A threat-intelligence feed currently lists this domain as distributing phishing, and the listing was most recently observed on 18 October 2026. The domain is the actor in that listing, not a bystander on a compromised host, and this is the decisive factor in the assessment. A separate external reputation check also blacklists the domain, with one engine rating it malicious and another suspicious. The visible page cannot be taken as reassurance. It is a benign hosting error page, and it contains no credential prompt, no brand imitation and no solicitation. A bare error page is, however, what a phishing kit can show to scanners, or what a deployment shows while its payload is inactive or has been removed. The behavioral sandbox found hidden forms in all three runs, including password-type fields. Roughly 99.6 percent of requests on one page load went to external destinations. Interaction produced very large page rewrites, and the final destination did not match the requested one. The destinations contacted were all on trusted lists and no wallet-drainer or clipboard-hijack behavior was seen. The static page capture shows no forms at all, so the hidden credential-capable forms appear only at runtime. Two abuse reports exist against a shared cloud IP address. They are discounted because that address is shared provider infrastructure, and they do not indicate misconduct by this site. No brand impersonation and no conflicting legal identities were observed, so the elevated risk rests on the phishing listing and the blacklist and not on identity contradictions. Evidence:
- Homepage: a standard hosting-provider 404 page of about 368 characters of text, with no visible forms, links or solicitations.
- Threat-intelligence listing: class phishing, role actor, most recent sighting 2026-10-18.
- Sandbox behavior across 3 of 3 runs: hidden forms detected, 3 password forms recorded, 4,132 page mutations after interaction, 15 external XHR calls and 21 external POSTs, all to whitelisted destinations.
- Sandbox: no wallet-connection, clipboard-hijack or fingerprinting activity.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The only page analysed carries no legal entity name, terms, privacy policy, licence or registration claim, and no regulator is cited. Independent identity verification is therefore not established. Operator ownership cannot be connected to any real-world brand or person from on-site evidence. This is a verification gap and not proof of wrongdoing, and the phishing listing and blacklist already supply the contradictory evidence. No third-party broker or regulatory record matched this domain. Absence from such datasets is neutral and gives neither support nor cause for concern. The hosting address belongs to a mainstream cloud provider, and the site has a valid organisation-validated TLS certificate. Both are facts about the shared Netlify platform and say nothing about whoever controls this subdomain. Evidence:
- Homepage: no company name, licence number, regulator, address or contact channel is published.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).
- Transport encryption: the TLS certificate was issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 at OV level, subject organisation Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19.
- No third-party broker or regulator database entry matched the domain.
What to Verify Next
Anyone who reached this address through a message, advertisement, social post or QR code should trace how the link was obtained and treat that source as suspect until it is confirmed through an independent route. If the link claims to represent a project, community or voting event, contact that organisation through an official channel found independently of the link and ask whether the address is theirs. The listing status should be re-checked before any later reassessment, because phishing infrastructure is often rotated or taken down quickly. Suspected abuse can be reported to the hosting platform's abuse process, and the sender or originating account can be reported on the platform where the link appeared. Evidence:
- Hostname: a voting-themed label on a shared free-hosting subdomain, with no independent link to an established organisation.
- Listing: the phishing designation was current as of the latest sighting on 2026-10-18.
- Homepage: no official contact route is published, so any outreach has to go through an independent channel.
Summary Verdict
The assessment is critically low and the posture is clearly cautionary. A current phishing listing and a blacklist outweigh the benign appearance of the visible page. Identity is unverified, and nothing observed offsets the active threat designation.
Infrastructure Integrity
The domain resolves behind a CDN/WAF layer. Cloudflare edge addresses on AS13335 were observed, and the hosting record is AS16509 (Amazon). All eight observed addresses were edge nodes and no origin address was observable. This is protective, mainstream infrastructure and a mitigating factor only. It does not offset the active threat listing, and shared platforms such as this are routinely used by both legitimate and malicious tenants.
Closing Assessment
This address should not be used for login, credential entry, wallet connection or any payment. The most that is reasonable is passive viewing with no data submitted. Anyone who has already entered credentials or connected a wallet should change those passwords and revoke wallet permissions immediately.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-19 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox.
01 Governance
- A threat-intelligence feed currently lists a file on this site as malicious, and that caps the score while the listing is live.Governance
rule:gov_active_threat_listing
02 External reputation
- A small number of malware engines flagged this domain. On its own this is a weak signal.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_MEDIUM
03 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS - Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH - The page replaced a large part of its own content after loading.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_DOM_CHANGE_HIGH
Signals weighed against the site
- AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.
Identity verification
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |
- No on-site identity signals detected
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of pump-voting-g5.netlify.app.
- The request stayed on pump-voting-g5.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | Not available |
| Country | Not available |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Lookup incomplete |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not available |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about pump-voting-g5.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.