Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
sendusdt-2-psi.vercel.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.
| What this site appears to be | A short wallet transfer interface prompting a user to send USDT to an address or domain; minimal explanatory context or provenance is present. |
|---|
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 19 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 80 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | Not availableNo registration record was returned | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
- The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
This website is a single-page cryptocurrency transfer interface titled "Transfer Trust Wallet" and hosted as a subdomain of a public application-hosting platform. It shows only a "Send USDT" form with an "Address or Domain Name" field, a "Paste" shortcut, an "Amount" field with a "Max" button, an approximate dollar value and a "Next" button. Its apparent purpose is to guide a visitor through sending USDT to a destination they supply, and it presents no company, product description or explanatory content.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
Hard contradictions are present. The site is blacklisted by external threat intelligence. A large number of independent security engines classify it as malicious, including several tier-one vendors, and the aggregate result is strong enough to override every mitigating factor. No impersonation of a specific brand was confirmed, and no phishing form, login prompt or hidden form was detected. The page title does borrow the name of a well-known wallet product, which is a presentation choice a visitor could misread as an affiliation, but nothing on the page establishes one. A wallet-transfer screen that moves irreversible stablecoin value, offers no provenance, audit or institutional identity cues, and has been flagged by security vendors fits the profile of a value-diversion lure. Behavioural testing found no outbound requests, wallet-drainer routines, clipboard manipulation or cloaking. That is a mitigating observation about the page as rendered, not an exoneration. A single-field form can redirect funds through whichever destination a visitor is induced to paste. Reports of abuse recorded against a shared hosting IP were also noted. They are attributed to the hosting provider's shared infrastructure and were discounted, so they are not counted against this site. Evidence:
- Homepage: the only visible content is the "Send USDT" form, with no brand, operator, terms or support information.
- External reputation: 19 security engines rated the site malicious and 1 suspicious, including Fortinet, Kaspersky and Sophos. This triggered a critical threat override.
- Behavioural sandbox: 3 of 3 runs completed with 0 external requests, 0 wallet-drainer runs and 0 clipboard-hijack events, so no active exploit mechanism was observed on the rendered page.
- Abuse reports: 80 reports against a shared Vercel content-delivery IP, discounted as shared-infrastructure noise.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The site exposes no legal, identity, licensing or disclosure pages. It makes no regulatory claim and names no operating entity, so there is nothing to cross-check and no conflicting legal identities. Real-world operator identity remains unverified. A service that facilitates movement of customer funds would ordinarily identify its operator and the regime under which it operates. Ownership and governance opacity are present here as content gaps on the site. No third-party broker or regulatory-database match exists for the site, which neither supports nor contradicts it. The site runs on a free subdomain of a general-purpose hosting platform rather than a dedicated domain, which is consistent with a throwaway deployment rather than an institutional service. Evidence:
- Homepage: no operator name, registration number, licence or jurisdiction is stated, and no legal pages exist.
- Hosting infrastructure: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).
- Transport encryption: the TLS certificate is issued by WR1 at domain-validated (DV) level and is valid to 2026-11-27. DV encryption confirms only control of the domain, not the operator's identity.
- Third-party broker reputation database: no match found.
What to Verify Next
No interaction involving credentials, wallet connections or fund transfers is supported by the evidence. Verification is only relevant for someone who was directed here by a third party. In that case, the instruction to send USDT should be confirmed through an independent, offline channel with the supposed counterparty, and not through any contact route supplied by this page or by the message that linked to it. The actual wallet or exchange product being referenced should be reached by typing its official address manually or through its official application. Any destination address or domain should be checked against the counterparty's own records before value is sent. Stablecoin transfers cannot be reversed. If funds were already sent, the sending wallet's provider and the relevant authorities should be contacted promptly. Evidence:
- Homepage: the form accepts any pasted address or domain, with no on-page confirmation of whom the recipient is.
- Homepage: the dollar-equivalent preview and "Max" control encourage fast, full-balance transfers with no stated safeguards.
- External reputation: the site's malicious classification is current and corroborated by multiple security vendors.
Summary Verdict
The available evidence supports a clearly high-risk posture. Corroborated external threat detections are decisive, and the page's thin, unattributed value-transfer design provides no legitimacy evidence to counter them. The site's apparent legitimacy cannot be established and its operator remains unverified.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site is served through Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, with a Vercel deployment behind it on Amazon-hosted address space (AS16509). All observed addresses belong to edge servers, and the origin server was not observable. These are mainstream, reputable providers, but they carry no weight as proof of legitimacy. Shared platforms of this kind host benign and malicious sites alike, so the infrastructure offers no meaningful offset to the external threat detections.
Closing Assessment
The site should be treated as unsafe for any financial action. No funds should be sent through it, and no credentials or wallet permissions should be entered on it. Anyone who arrived through an unsolicited link or message should disengage, avoid reuse of the link and report it to the platform or channel that supplied it.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-19 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
2 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, page content.
01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
02 Page content
- The page shows few of the signs expected from a trustworthy operator.Page content
rule:PAGE_TRUST_QUALITY_LOW - The page content shows three or more warning signs that deceptive sites commonly use.Page content
rule:PAGE_RED_FLAGS_STRONG - The review of the page content rated it moderate risk.Page content
rule:PAGE_RISK_MED - The page has very little readable content.Page content
rule:PAGE_CONTENT_THIN - The page content shows at least one warning sign that deceptive sites commonly use.Page content
rule:PAGE_RED_FLAGS_SOME
Signals weighed against the site
- AbuseIPDB: 80 reports on hosting IP 64.29.17.131 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.
Identity verification
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |
- No on-site identity signals detected
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of sendusdt-2-psi.vercel.app.
- The request stayed on sendusdt-2-psi.vercel.app. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | Not available |
| Country | Not available |
| Server IP | 64.29.17.131 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Lookup incomplete |
| SSL issuer | WR1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-11-27 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not available |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 19 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 80 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about sendusdt-2-psi.vercel.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.